Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(71 posts)

5. It's a setback that not one juror saw what you see?

Fri Mar 27, 2015, 05:28 PM

Mar 2015

I would assume they saw more evidence from both sides than we did.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Ellen Pao Loses Lawsuit Against Silicon Valley On All Counts [View all] RandySF Mar 2015 OP

That is too bad. n/t CaliforniaPeggy Mar 2015 #1

Why? Nt dariomax Mar 2015 #3

Because it's a setback for women in her position. You didn't see that? CaliforniaPeggy Mar 2015 #4

It's a setback that not one juror saw what you see? dariomax Mar 2015 #5

As far as I'm concerned, it's a setback for women in her position. CaliforniaPeggy Mar 2015 #6

I saw a few discrimination cases of this sort when clerking hifiguy Mar 2015 #2