Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: 2024 [View all]

sad sally

(2,627 posts)
9. Throwing this thought out that I know I'll be blasted for:
Thu May 3, 2012, 11:56 PM
May 2012

The Enduring Strategic Partnership Agreement signed on May 2 (which by the way has the 2024 date in it) talks about "encouraging US private sector activity in Afghanistan," and the "desire" that the Afghan people be the beneficiaries of Afghanistan's mineral wealth. Hmm, remember this story in 2010?

The United States has discovered nearly $1 trillion in untapped mineral deposits in Afghanistan, far beyond any previously known reserves and enough to fundamentally alter the Afghan economy and perhaps the Afghan war itself, according to senior American government officials."

Wow! Talk about a game changer. The story goes on to outline Afghanistan's apparently vast underground resources, which include large copper and iron reserves as well as hitherto undiscovered reserves lithium and other rare minerals.

Read a little more carefully, though, and you realize that there's less to this scoop than meets the eye. For one thing, the findings on which the story was based are online and have been since 2007, courtesy of the U.S. Geological Survey. More information is available on the Afghan mining ministry's website, including a report by the British Geological Survey (and there's more here). You can also take a look at the USGS's documentation of the airborne part of the survey here, including the full set of aerial photographs.
-----
But I'm (a) skeptical of that $1 trillion figure; (b) skeptical of the timing of this story, given the bad news cycle, and (c) skeptical that Afghanistan can really figure out a way to develop these resources in a useful way. It's also worth noting, as Risen does, that it will take years to get any of this stuff out of the ground, not to mention enormous capital investment.


http://blog.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2010/06/14/say_what_afghanistan_has_1_trillion_in_untapped_mineral_resources

any correlation why the US says we have to stay until 2024?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

2024 [View all] MadHound May 2012 OP
Get them home now. BlueIris May 2012 #1
Good grief ProSense May 2012 #2
Because the pitch has been telegraphed early in the wind up MadHound May 2012 #3
While I'm ProSense May 2012 #4
I agree, that is no reason for continuing a war, MadHound May 2012 #5
If the ProSense May 2012 #7
That is the official justification, part of the public smokescreen, MadHound May 2012 #8
Seems, like ProSense May 2012 #10
Not dealing in rumors, but rather fact. MadHound May 2012 #12
It's only 2 short years. joshcryer May 2012 #13
Whether they have the U.S. flag on their uniform or not an occupation is an occupation. white_wolf May 2012 #16
I don't disagree. But the question is US troops. joshcryer May 2012 #17
Here's what's ProSense May 2012 #14
Gee, I guess you haven't seen my other threads, MadHound May 2012 #19
Yes, some certainly will believe anything. EOTE May 2012 #24
LOL, so you now are defending the 2024 date? Logical May 2012 #22
US involvement in WWII--12-7-1941 to 9-2-1945. Not 4 full years. nt Romulox May 2012 #6
And, we still have troops in both Germany and Japan. MineralMan May 2012 #27
Big difference MadHound May 2012 #28
Not my point, actually. MineralMan May 2012 #30
I know--all those horrific IED attacks in Germany and Japan! Romulox May 2012 #29
You misunderstand my reference. MineralMan May 2012 #31
Throwing this thought out that I know I'll be blasted for: sad sally May 2012 #9
Well, given that we're apparently now going to be there for years MadHound May 2012 #11
+1 I think the pipeling is why we invaded. Even if troops come home AnotherDreamWeaver May 2012 #15
China will be happy for the US to provide security for the oil and gas supplies. sad sally May 2012 #25
Not only in Afghanistan, MadHound May 2012 #26
Our so-called transparent of-the-people government will make sure we never know the truth. sad sally May 2012 #32
Plus unknown numbers of contractors, paid for by the US government, part of our new HiPointDem May 2012 #18
DURec KG May 2012 #20
We still have troops in Germany and Japan Motown_Johnny May 2012 #21
So that somehow makes it all okey-dokey? MadHound May 2012 #23
Every single hour we stay in Afghanistan is,.... bvar22 May 2012 #33
The Question Still Stands... WillyT May 2012 #34
American troops in Germany, Japan are not at war. bluestate10 May 2012 #35
In other news, free sweets tomorrow! malthaussen May 2012 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»2024»Reply #9