Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SickOfTheOnePct

(8,710 posts)
24. And again, you avoid the question
Sat Mar 28, 2015, 03:07 PM
Mar 2015

But if it bolsters your ego to call people names when you have no facts to back you up, have at it. I guess that's better than admitting that you've painted yourself into a corner regarding abortion and privacy rights.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This should be done across the country. How is it that being selected for jury duty is mandatory but BlueCaliDem Mar 2015 #1
Because it's not right to force people to exercise a right n/t SickOfTheOnePct Mar 2015 #3
Then change the wording. Make it a civil DUTY. You know? Just like being forced to sit on a jury. nt BlueCaliDem Mar 2015 #7
Change the wording of the Constitution? SickOfTheOnePct Mar 2015 #9
Where in the Constitution does it mandate jury duty? That's right. It doesn't. Yet the moment you BlueCaliDem Mar 2015 #10
Addendum... BlueCaliDem Mar 2015 #11
Voting is a Constitutional right SickOfTheOnePct Mar 2015 #13
Can you point out to me where in the Constitution it states that voting is a Constitutional Right? BlueCaliDem Mar 2015 #14
I don't think you want to go down the road of only acknowledging enumerated rights SickOfTheOnePct Mar 2015 #15
This may surprise you, but there is no right to vote enshrined in the U.S. Constitution. BlueCaliDem Mar 2015 #16
OK, playing your game, are you saying that unless a right is written in the Constitution SickOfTheOnePct Mar 2015 #17
The U.S. Supreme Court is a "wannabe internet Constitional lawyer"? Um, no. BlueCaliDem Mar 2015 #18
Sorry, I think you're wrong SickOfTheOnePct Mar 2015 #21
Nope. But you are. BlueCaliDem Mar 2015 #22
And again, you avoid the question SickOfTheOnePct Mar 2015 #24
I've presented the facts. You haven't. And I didn't know it was a requirement that we answer BlueCaliDem Mar 2015 #25
You're right, you don't have to answer any questions SickOfTheOnePct Mar 2015 #28
I've never said such a thing. That's what YOU make of it, and that's why I've ignored your BlueCaliDem Mar 2015 #31
automatically registering people to vote is an awesome idea and not unconstitutional CreekDog Mar 2015 #19
According to SOTOP, it's totally unconstitional. He knows he's wrong. He's BlueCaliDem Mar 2015 #26
It's not unconstitutional to force someone to register SickOfTheOnePct Mar 2015 #29
Yeah. I know. You didn't appear to know, judging from your response to my BlueCaliDem Mar 2015 #32
2014 midterms, CA turnout 42%. Oregon turnout 69.3% and we thought that was low.... Bluenorthwest Mar 2015 #2
Oregon Old Codger Mar 2015 #4
That high? It was less than 30% in my county Retrograde Mar 2015 #8
You still have to get them to the polls angryvet Mar 2015 #5
Knock Down One Obstacle At A Time... WillyT Mar 2015 #6
California *does* have permanent vote by mail in every county, but not exclusively so. It's still BlueCaliDem Mar 2015 #12
California does have vote by mail CreekDog Mar 2015 #20
Me, too. eom BlueCaliDem Mar 2015 #27
Vote by mail is available to all California voters Retrograde Mar 2015 #23
I don't see this as being a big help ripcord Mar 2015 #30
Ifd they were truly serious about adding more voters they would Bandit Mar 2015 #33
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How California Could Boos...»Reply #24