Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

mick063

(2,424 posts)
114. More about DTPA
Thu May 3, 2012, 11:38 PM
May 2012

From the link in my previous post:


Facts About DTPA

What is DTPA?

DTPA is a kind of medicine called a chelating agent. Chelating agents work by binding and holding on to radioactive materials or poisons that get into the body. Once bound to a radioactive material or poison, the chelating agent is then passed from the body in the urine. Chelating agents help decrease the amount of time it takes to get a poison out of the body. This fact sheet from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) gives you some basic information about DTPA.

What does DTPA do?

When radioactive materials get into the body through breathing, eating, drinking, or through open wounds, we say that “internal contamination” has occurred. Over the past 50 years, almost all cases of internal contamination have happened in people who use radioactive materials in their work. Since the 1960s, doctors have used DTPA as a chelating agent to treat internal contamination from radioactive materials such as americium, plutonium, californium, curium, and berkelium. Currently, DTPA is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for chelation of only three radioactive materials: plutonium, americium, and curium.

What DTPA cannot do

Knowing what DTPA cannot do is also important. DTPA cannot bind all of the radioactive materials that might get into a person’s body after a radiological or nuclear event, such as a terrorist attack with a “dirty bomb.” This medicine cannot prevent radioactive materials from entering the body. DTPA cannot reverse the health effects caused by radioactive materials once these materials have entered the body.

How does DTPA work?

DTPA comes in two forms: calcium (Ca-DTPA) and zinc (Zn-DTPA). Both forms work by tightly chelating (holding on to) plutonium, americium, and curium. These radioactive materials (bound to DTPA) are then passed from the body in the urine. When given within the first day after internal contamination has occurred, Ca-DTPA is about 10 times more effective than Zn-DTPA at chelating plutonium, americium, and curium. After 24 hours have passed, Ca-DTPA and Zn-DTPA are equally effective in chelating these radioactive materials.

How well does DTPA work?

Chelating agents work best when given shortly after radioactive materials or poisons have entered the body. The more quickly a radioactive material or poison is removed from the body, the fewer and less serious the health effects will be. After 24 hours, plutonium, americium, and curium are harder to chelate. However, DTPA can still work to remove these radioactive materials from the body several days or even weeks after a person has been internally contaminated.y.

Who should get DTPA?

Many people could be internally contaminated after a radiological or nuclear terrorist event. People contaminated with small amounts of radioactive materials might not need treatment with DTPA. Doctors and public health authorities will work together to decide who will likely benefit from DTPA treatment.
•Infants (including breastfed infants) and children <12 years of age
Either Ca-DTPA or Zn-DTPA may be given to infants and children. The dosage of DTPA to be given should be based on the child ’s size and weight.

•Young adults and adults
Young adults and adults internally contaminated with plutonium, americium, or curium should receive Ca-DTPA if treated within the first 24 hours after contamination. After 24 hours, if additional treatment is needed, adults should receive Zn-DTPA. If Zn-DTPA is not available, patients may receive Ca-DTPA together with a vitamin and mineral supplement that contains zinc.
•Pregnant women
Unless a pregnant woman has very high levels of internal contamination with plutonium, americium, or curium, treatment should begin and continue with Zn-DTPA. Ca-DTPA should be used in pregnant women only to treat very high levels of internal radioactive contamination. In this case, doctors and public health authorities may prescribe a single dose of Ca-DTPA, together with a vitamin and mineral supplement that contains zinc, as the first treatment. However, after the first dose of Ca-DTPA, treatment should continue 24 hours later with a daily dose of Zn-DTPA, as needed.
•Breastfeeding women
Radioactive materials can—and do—get into breast milk. For this reason, CDC recommends that women with internal contamination stop breastfeeding and feed the child baby formula or other food if it is available. If breast milk is the only food available for an infant, nursing should continue. Breastfeeding women who are internally contaminated with plutonium, americium, or curium should be treated with DTPA.

How should DTPA be given?

Currently, DTPA is only available by injection and is not available in an oral (by mouth) form. DTPA may be injected directly into a vein in the arm or dripped into a vein from a bag (intravenously [IV]). Injection and IV drip are good ways of treating people a) who might have been internally contaminated by eating, drinking, or inhaling radioactive materials or b) who have contaminated wounds.

Adults who have inhaled plutonium, americium, or curium can be treated with DTPA mist or spray that is breathed into the lungs. Inhaling DTPA might cause some people, especially those with asthma, to cough or wheeze. The safety and effectiveness of inhaled DTPA has not been shown in children.

How often will I need to get DTPA?

DTPA should be taken only as long as your doctor has determined you need it. In the past, most people who have needed treatment with DTPA have only needed one dose. However, internal contamination with very high levels of plutonium, americium, or curium may require treatment with DTPA every day for weeks or months. The length of treatment with DTPA will depend on a) the amount of radioactive material in your body and b) how well your body gets rid of the radioactive material. Doctors might collect samples of blood, urine, and feces during your treatment with DTPA. These samples can tell the doctors how much radioactivity you are passing and how much remains in your body.

Medical conditions that might make it harmful to receive DTPA

There are no medical reasons why a person who is internally contaminated with plutonium, americium, or curium should not be treated with Ca-DTPA or Zn-DTPA. However, keep the following guidelines in mind:
•Because radioactive materials chelated to DTPA are passed out of the body in the urine, DTPA must be used carefully in people whose kidneys do not function properly.
•Ca-DTPA should be used carefully in people who have a disease called “hemochromatosis.” (Hemochromatosis is a genetic disease that causes the body to absorb too much iron from foods and other sources, such as vitamins containing iron.)
•Breathing treatments using DTPA may not be safe for some people with asthma. If a person with asthma requires treatment with DTPA, the drug should be injected.
•DTPA should not be used to treat people who are internally contaminated with the radioactive materials uranium or neptunium.

What are the possible risks and side effects of DTPA?

DTPA does not build up in the body or cause long-term health effects. People who are given repeat doses of Ca-DTPA within a short period of time may have nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, chills, fever, itching, and muscle cramps. Other side effects may include headache, lightheadedness, chest pain, and a metallic taste in the mouth.

Ca-DTPA (and Zn-DTPA) can chelate certain important minerals that the body needs (zinc, magnesium, and manganese). For example, the body needs zinc to make red blood cells, white blood cells, and platelets. Therefore, DTPA treatment may interfere with the normal production of blood cells. As a precaution, patients receiving long-term treatment with DTPA should be given a vitamin and mineral supplement that contains zinc.

Where can I get DTPA?

CDC has included both Ca-DTPA and Zn-DTPA in the Strategic National Stockpile, a collection of medicines and medical supplies that CDC maintains for emergencies. During an emergency, these medicines and medical supplies are given to doctors and hospitals for treatment of patients.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

What in Hell have we been fooling with? KansDem May 2012 #1
Don't worry, we run out of people after 2 or 3 rods Motown_Johnny May 2012 #11
Just like the nuclear missles we stockpiled for years and years dixiegrrrrl May 2012 #29
"How about a nice game of chess?" FiveGoodMen May 2012 #31
Strange game, the only way to win is not to play. Motown_Johnny May 2012 #37
YES! Delphinus May 2012 #82
Yes, if you carefully grind up each fuel rod an dispense a little tiny bit jeff47 May 2012 #13
Explosions RobertEarl May 2012 #21
So we're all already dead, right? jeff47 May 2012 #23
Did you eat some? RobertEarl May 2012 #28
Hey now, this is your story not mine jeff47 May 2012 #56
Members of my family have spent the last 30 years moving NUCLEAR waste around and... Tikki May 2012 #43
I've been to Hanford appal_jack May 2012 #77
You're posting false information. TheWraith May 2012 #44
You are wrong RobertEarl May 2012 #47
I dunno, where's your iodine bottles? Zalatix May 2012 #62
The European plutonium is probably from a European source Art_from_Ark May 2012 #65
Your credibility on this matter has been shown to be zero. When you're in a hole, quit digging. apocalypsehow May 2012 #105
Nuclear shit we made is a bit different from water, duh. Peace Patriot May 2012 #66
"Tell that to a plant, how dangerous carbon dioxide is" paulk May 2012 #76
I don't think it's a stupid analogy at all. EOTE May 2012 #90
more fear mongering paulk May 2012 #95
Funny, I don't see a single mention of fuel rods killing billions of people in that article. EOTE May 2012 #97
if that thing goes all the "fear mongering" in the world paulk May 2012 #99
And people wonder why this can't get decent coverage. EOTE May 2012 #104
don't worry, be happy paulk May 2012 #107
Yeah, that's right. It's either "everything's dandy!" or "Everyone's gonna die!!!!" EOTE May 2012 #108
and calling someone "simple minded" paulk May 2012 #109
Knowing simple minded thought when one sees it? EOTE May 2012 #110
I was thinking more along the lines of "asshole" paulk May 2012 #111
It's far better to come to this site as an anonymous asshole EOTE May 2012 #112
But don't worry. It's really clean and safe and so much better than coal. Cleita May 2012 #36
We'll have to put the Turbineguy May 2012 #2
... TBF May 2012 #10
The article doesn't mention how the US is in "huge trouble." JDPriestly May 2012 #3
Wyden lives in Oregon lovuian May 2012 #5
I live in LA. It's really frightening. JDPriestly May 2012 #100
NaturalNews with irresponsible scare tactics Lawlbringer May 2012 #6
There are other sources lovuian May 2012 #8
Radiation plume alfredo May 2012 #19
*blink* Arbitrary Units? jeff47 May 2012 #24
I compared this graphic to others that showed a similar profile, not to show amount, alfredo May 2012 #52
Except that the amount is the entire point. jeff47 May 2012 #57
Not just US, America...because it is far worst and not being reported as such mother earth May 2012 #7
Actually, if you go by what's been online thus far jeff47 May 2012 #12
I didn't quote any article and am going by memory, and how I interpreted what I read, not a mother earth May 2012 #74
My point is there's an awful lot of hysterical doom-n-gloom jeff47 May 2012 #81
Post removed Post removed May 2012 #86
Thanks for proving my point so well! jeff47 May 2012 #89
Terrible news Politicalboi May 2012 #4
WSJ source lovuian May 2012 #9
There are 4.5 to 5.0 quakes off the Honshu coast. Three just yesterday. alfredo May 2012 #22
So, despite the title is it more accurate to say the entire world Rex May 2012 #14
Yep lovuian May 2012 #16
Huffington Post article lovuian May 2012 #15
From satellites and the Space Station we can make radiation maps Downwinder May 2012 #17
They've already been made jeff47 May 2012 #27
Bullcrap RobertEarl May 2012 #30
Google "fukushima radiation plume", then narrow to "images" bhikkhu May 2012 #40
oK, THANKS RobertEarl May 2012 #42
You mean like the "Arbitrary Units" one above? jeff47 May 2012 #58
Same as eating three bananas a day...right, Jeffie? PCIntern May 2012 #48
jeff the banana guy Generic Other May 2012 #51
Might wanna get that memory checked jeff47 May 2012 #61
My apologies Generic Other May 2012 #63
LOL !! alittlelark May 2012 #98
You're free to show any, you know, data. jeff47 May 2012 #59
Angst. Ghost Dog May 2012 #18
It's slightly shocking how little discussion that letter is generating. nt redqueen May 2012 #20
NOW is the time to address these potential problems. felix_numinous May 2012 #25
We can't address huge problems even when they destroy our economy kenny blankenship May 2012 #26
Kick - exposure DearAbby May 2012 #32
K&R. Horrific indeed. n/t DLevine May 2012 #33
Sounds like there's no reason to get in a snit over this tularetom May 2012 #34
Not so Tularetom RobertEarl May 2012 #50
K&R SunSeeker May 2012 #35
Oh, no. All our resources go to war and tax breaks for the wealthy. valerief May 2012 #38
Both governments seem awfully unconcerned, frankly. marble falls May 2012 #39
I shit that stuff after going out for Mexican! L0oniX May 2012 #41
And everything that comes directly from Sen Wyden, take seriously. "Christina Consolo"? not so much. Warren DeMontague May 2012 #45
the 1565 fuel rod claim and the number of people claim are both coming from Natural News Occulus May 2012 #46
Ok this is a repeat but there are more sources lovuian May 2012 #53
naturalnews. LOL...nt SidDithers May 2012 #49
what about Senator Wydens page lovuian May 2012 #54
If you had "reliable" sources... SidDithers May 2012 #55
ugh spanone May 2012 #60
Jeez, how could you not listen to Consolo? EX500rider May 2012 #64
The chances of the "unsinkable Titanic" going down were also improbable. Peace Patriot May 2012 #69
Self-sustaining chain reactions at the site are now unlikely... EX500rider May 2012 #91
What do you need more to GET IT West Coast "Lethal Risk" lovuian May 2012 #71
Where does Wyden say anything about "lethal risk" to the West coast? EX500rider May 2012 #96
SOuth America here I come ErikJ May 2012 #67
The "naysayer shills" on this thread are incredibly ignorant. BeHereNow May 2012 #68
I have to admit lovuian May 2012 #70
It's not exactly helpful to mix talk of prophecies redqueen May 2012 #72
And it is extreme ignorance and bigotry to refer to other cultural beliefs as "Woo-Woo." BeHereNow May 2012 #92
Prophecies are nonsense. That is my opinion. redqueen May 2012 #93
Oh hell, would you take the time to watch a documentary and open your mind for an hour? BeHereNow May 2012 #94
As hopeless as it all seems... EmeraldCityGrl May 2012 #103
Yes, if the Kogi and Hopi prophecies are the same, it is just coincidence... SidDithers May 2012 #75
In the past 60 years, we've already vaporized and distributed many pounds of plutonium into the air NickB79 May 2012 #73
Yep RobertEarl May 2012 #78
If the OP's math were correct, we'd all be dead by now NickB79 May 2012 #101
The warnings continue but no one pays attention. nt ladjf May 2012 #79
The title of the thread says the warning is from a nuclear expert MattBaggins May 2012 #80
I am a nuclear chemical operator mick063 May 2012 #83
Thanks, mick RobertEarl May 2012 #84
thanks for the post, mick bigtree May 2012 #85
you're a big shot here, bigtree RobertEarl May 2012 #88
"I am a nuclear chemical operator" - LOL. Fancy that! I'm an astronaunt working on warp drive for apocalypsehow May 2012 #106
Absolute truth mick063 May 2012 #113
More about DTPA mick063 May 2012 #114
Uh-huh. n/t. apocalypsehow May 2012 #115
Every now and then someone has an epiphany raouldukelives May 2012 #87
Already Rec'd and now it's time for a KICK! BeHereNow May 2012 #102
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»America in 'huge trouble,...»Reply #114