Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)How to Kill a Profession [View all]
From The Superintendent's Chair:
How to kill a profession
So you want to kill a profession.
It's easy.
First you demonize the profession. To do this you will need a well-organized, broad-based public relations campaign that casts everyone associated with the profession as incompetent and doing harm. As an example, a well-orchestrated public relations campaign could get the front cover of a historically influential magazine to invoke an image that those associated with the profession are "rotten apples."
Then you remove revenue control from the budget responsibilities of those at the local level. Then you tell the organization to run like a business which they clearly cannot do because they no longer have control of the revenue. As an example, you could create a system that places the control for revenue in the hands of the state legislature instead of with the local school board or local community.
Then you provide revenue that gives a local agency two choices: Give raises and go into deficit or don't give raises so that you can maintain a fund balance but in the process demoralize employees. As an example, in Michigan there are school districts that have little to no fund balance who have continued to give raises to employees and you have school districts that have relatively healthy fund balances that have not given employees raises for several years.
Then have the state tell the local agency that it must tighten its belt to balance revenue and expenses. The underlying, unspoken assumption being that the employees will take up the slack and pay for needed supplies out of their own pockets.
Additionally , introduce "independent" charters so that "competition" and "market-forces" will "drive" the industry. However, many of these charters, when examined, give the illusion of a better environment but when examined show no improvement in service. The charters also offer no comprehensive benefits or significantly fewer benefits for employees. So the charters offer no better quality for "customers" and no security for employees but they ravage the local environment.
I don't think the article made clear that when a child moves to a charter school, public money goes with them. That money goes to schools whose finances are unregulated and often held unaccountable.
The money that made it possible for America to have a system of free public education for everyone is now all too often going to private companies.
The public schools and teachers have no resources to run ads to defend themselves against the corporate raiders who can get their agenda on the front of magazines like Time.

133 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
TIME and CNN once were not total tools of Wall Street and religious bias mixed with opinion.
Fred Sanders
Mar 2015
#1
no; we were just more trusting. but cnn *was* better, i think, in the turner era.
ND-Dem
Mar 2015
#121
TIME was founded by one of the most conservative men in US history, Henry Luce
alcibiades_mystery
Mar 2015
#9
time used to be (maybe still is, though it's increasingly irrelevant) a CIA outpost.
ND-Dem
Mar 2015
#119
Funny how it worked for many decades until the profiteers decided they wanted more.
Enthusiast
Mar 2015
#60
Perhaps it is fair to say that all professions have their profiteers and exploiters
elias7
Mar 2015
#111
They also hide their conflicts of interest so they can intentionally provide false legal advice
Baitball Blogger
Mar 2015
#122
Yep, Dustlawyer - likening lawyers to unions, even so - without either, we'd be in deeper doo doo
raven mad
Mar 2015
#56
Because unless something glaringly egregious occurs, their crimes are covered up. You
ND-Dem
Mar 2015
#120
"Bad teacher" is a talking point with no facts behind it. What are they defining as "bad"?
DesertDiamond
Mar 2015
#12
Recall Rhee in DC before I knew much about the buy-partisan corpo attack on teachers & schools.
appalachiablue
Mar 2015
#49
Yea, true. Her credentials are non existent...how she was ever in such a position of authority
Jefferson23
Mar 2015
#51
Isn't she pretty much over, though? Turns out her much-touted reforms were a crock of
ND-Dem
Mar 2015
#126
I think you're right, but the damage continues and I am not sure they'll find
Jefferson23
Mar 2015
#127
I'm waiting for the cover of "Rotten Apples: How to Fix America's Banks".
appalachiablue
Mar 2015
#33
I was a victim of bad teachers too, but they were non-union teachers and nuns at a parochial school.
smokey nj
Mar 2015
#92
I was too, and I went to public schools in SC where unions were and are rare as a black swan. nt
raccoon
Mar 2015
#116
See if you can spot the Cross in the poster for Waiting for Superman. (Hint: Look to the heavens.)
blkmusclmachine
Mar 2015
#76
I've heard several of my younger relatives blame the teacher when they don't do well.
greymattermom
Mar 2015
#86
I would just like to call attention to Mike Pence- who deliberately subverted the will
silvershadow
Mar 2015
#95
