Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DebJ

(7,699 posts)
37. There is no such thing as a good year to lose the Presidency, or the Senate, or the House.
Sun Mar 29, 2015, 02:07 AM
Mar 2015

Not ever. Never a good thing to let the party of Sociopaths control anything.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

scotus is primary all other concerns are secondary Romeo.lima333 Mar 2015 #1
+ 1 million MBS Mar 2015 #96
I do, too deutsey Mar 2015 #100
Yes get the red out Mar 2015 #103
Um, that would be NO. Losing it in 2016 would be awful. CaliforniaPeggy Mar 2015 #2
Winning is better than losing. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #3
Yup. Agschmid Mar 2015 #4
Loosing? Warren DeMontague Mar 2015 #73
They do it in New Hampshire TheCowsCameHome Mar 2015 #77
. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #91
Sorry, pet peeve. Warren DeMontague Mar 2015 #94
No Kalidurga Mar 2015 #5
It would be interesting to see if the OP is a member of any of those groups... DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #23
+100 n/t JustAnotherGen Mar 2015 #102
THAT is a dumb question. I don't know of one babylonsister Mar 2015 #6
Forget about viability Renew Deal Mar 2015 #8
OK. Horribe idea imo. Still. nt babylonsister Mar 2015 #26
We, the people, cannot afford to lose in 2016!!! Major Hogwash Mar 2015 #45
Definitly, it was the "lost decade" and all these years later we're still working on RKP5637 Mar 2015 #65
assuming what you say is true 2016 would probably be more important than 2020 JI7 Mar 2015 #7
This... Renew Deal Mar 2015 #9
What kind of dumb ass question is that bigdarryl Mar 2015 #10
Would Floyd Mayweather be better off losing to Manny Pacquiao or vice versa?/NT DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #11
I think Floyd would be better off losing Cali_Democrat Mar 2015 #13
Floyd thinks he's better than Muhammad Ali or Sugar Ray Robinson because they lost... DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #17
He's undefeated brush Mar 2015 #63
I don't want to turn this into a boxing thread DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #72
Not even close to the same Renew Deal Mar 2015 #14
"Tanked" DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #19
And none of their best candidates ran. Renew Deal Mar 2015 #21
Fox News and the righties were convinced that Romney would be the winner Gothmog Mar 2015 #85
Kind of exactly but I think most Foxies knew better while some believed their own bullshit. DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #88
"We likely can't hold it for 2020" based on what? arcane1 Mar 2015 #12
When was the last time a party held the presidency for 16 years? Renew Deal Mar 2015 #15
Irrelevant. arcane1 Mar 2015 #18
When was the last time there was this kind of babylonsister Mar 2015 #28
When was the last time there was a great demographic shift? joshcryer Mar 2015 #55
In presidential elections with an incumbent on the ballot, the incumbent has won bornskeptic Mar 2015 #95
When was the last time you rotated your tires and lost a lug nut snooper2 Mar 2015 #104
Unless the GOP change their position on immigration, the Hispanic vote will be even stronger in 2020 Gothmog Mar 2015 #86
....... steve2470 Mar 2015 #16
Hey steve! Cha Mar 2015 #25
hey Cha! :) steve2470 Mar 2015 #27
Bush was a nightmare think Mar 2015 #20
This would be worse and have more lasting consequences still_one Mar 2015 #33
Worst Nightmare. Scott Walker. Walker would really mess things up. /nt think Mar 2015 #34
Not at all jmowreader Mar 2015 #22
WTF Cha Mar 2015 #24
When the GOP are rounding up clown like Cruz to run, it is nover a time to lose an election. Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #29
No. We can't afford to lose in 2016. TDale313 Mar 2015 #30
Kuh-wazy. A-Schwarzenegger Mar 2015 #31
No! Contrary to some views there are major differences between still_one Mar 2015 #32
Losing is not good, or better. Mz Pip Mar 2015 #35
Don't forget they control the lion's share of the governorships and state legislatures too.../NT DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #76
NO!!!!! We lose the presidency, we lose SCOTUS. Period. Initech Mar 2015 #36
There is no such thing as a good year to lose the Presidency, or the Senate, or the House. DebJ Mar 2015 #37
WTF Hekate Mar 2015 #38
A short-term Democratic loss... Binkie The Clown Mar 2015 #39
this is fantasy. Any republican term in the WH is dangerous and affects millions of individuals bigtree Mar 2015 #41
well done Willem Mar 2015 #42
The White House is not a rook. RandySF Mar 2015 #44
That was the theory Nader promoted in the 2000 election. And we saw how well that worked out. pnwmom Mar 2015 #47
People said this shit in 2000. RandySF Mar 2015 #50
The Nader strategy. joshcryer Mar 2015 #56
well Willem Mar 2015 #40
Is America better off? RandySF Mar 2015 #43
NO. NO. NO. NO. NO. A thousand times NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! pnwmom Mar 2015 #46
Only if you want a right wing Supreme Court for the next two decades DFW Mar 2015 #48
If they win in 2016 octoberlib Mar 2015 #49
It depends if a corporate Dem is the nominee yes we would be better off losing anotojefiremnesuka Mar 2015 #51
"Accept Doom" email campaigns, posts like this.... woo me with science Mar 2015 #52
Oh yes, "corporate messaging" is behind "anti-GWB 2.0." joshcryer Mar 2015 #54
Just fascinating to watch the attempts at spin. woo me with science Mar 2015 #57
The OP is objectively against "GWB 2.0." joshcryer Mar 2015 #60
Surreal... woo me with science Mar 2015 #61
^This^ should be a pinned OP. RiverLover Mar 2015 #62
Ask GWB. Or alternatively *. joshcryer Mar 2015 #53
If the Republicans run a tea-party type candidate Revanchist Mar 2015 #58
If the GOP Selects a TeaHadist to run for POTUS the Democrats will select a Corporate Dem anotojefiremnesuka Mar 2015 #59
never Doctor_J Mar 2015 #64
If we lose in 2016 we may never get it back. DCBob Mar 2015 #66
It is NEVER desirable to lose ANYTHING. RBInMaine Mar 2015 #67
If Ted Cruz is the Republican nominee, 2016 = Democrat win. Yorktown Mar 2015 #68
I heard exactly the same nonsense in 1980 thucythucy Mar 2015 #79
LOL Reagan had popular appeal, Cruz has God-nut appeal Yorktown Mar 2015 #92
The American people thucythucy Mar 2015 #98
I guess it depends on how much you like Social Security and Medicare. Vinca Mar 2015 #69
Of course not . . . Geez louise DrDan Mar 2015 #70
No! It is imperative that the Democrats keep avebury Mar 2015 #71
And giving up the US Supreme Court for two more generations? hlthe2b Mar 2015 #74
I'd say losing the senate & the presidency is the worst case HereSince1628 Mar 2015 #75
Just plain dumb idea HERVEPA Mar 2015 #78
No Proud Liberal Dem Mar 2015 #80
NO. DinahMoeHum Mar 2015 #81
That's a question that can only really be answered 'after the fact', Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2015 #82
Depends on who the Democratic nominee is. n/t 99Forever Mar 2015 #83
Losing in 2016 is a horrible concept Gothmog Mar 2015 #84
You have to be honest about probably losing Roe but once you betterdemsonly Mar 2015 #87
If we lose in 2016... yuiyoshida Mar 2015 #89
Why wouldn't we hold it in 2020? MineralMan Mar 2015 #90
No. HuckleB Mar 2015 #93
And lose how many SCOTUS seats? gollygee Mar 2015 #97
we have to win in 2016 because i really don't want to go through all the hassle of Takket Mar 2015 #99
No Liberalynn Mar 2015 #101
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Are Democrats better off ...»Reply #37