General Discussion

cali

(114,904 posts)

35. You were claiming it's a lie and the same thing as in the OP. IT DAMN WELL IS NOT.

Reply to LittleGirl (Reply #34)

Sun Mar 29, 2015, 10:36 AM

Mar 2015

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

68 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

How can it be legal to force docs to give misleading or harmful info to patients? [View all] cali Mar 2015 OP

They need to be prosecuting these idiots avebury Mar 2015 #1

They aren't practicing medicine without a license cali Mar 2015 #3

You have elected officials dictating to avebury Mar 2015 #17

Death panels next father founding Mar 2015 #24

This message was self-deleted by its author Dont call me Shirley Mar 2015 #37

I can't think of any other medical procedure that requires, by law, that a physician provide Arkansas Granny Mar 2015 #2

First do no harm. Yeah, right. cali Mar 2015 #4

Forced malpractice Jeff Murdoch Mar 2015 #14

It IS insane! smirkymonkey Mar 2015 #58

"Government over-reach" by the loons who rail against such. BumRushDaShow Mar 2015 #5

kick. yeah, I know much of DU doesn't give a flying fuck about abortion. cali Mar 2015 #6

Unfortunately, we seem to have a sizable MRA contingent here. smirkymonkey Mar 2015 #59

it pains me to agree with you on that n/t cali Mar 2015 #65

So why doesn't this type of discriminatory garbage spark the outrage cali Mar 2015 #7

this is what I keep asking, all over the place. BlancheSplanchnik Mar 2015 #11

+1 laundry_queen Mar 2015 #19

I've noticed that too. smirkymonkey Mar 2015 #60

Women are greater than.. sendero Mar 2015 #8

Really? Are you male? cali Mar 2015 #9

There is a message in there.. sendero Mar 2015 #10

as it's men who are responsible for most of this shit and for cali Mar 2015 #12

Do all men agree with you and vote the same as you do? Why not? Fucking dumb shit post. n/t seaglass Mar 2015 #20

OK, so where is the celeb circuit, twitter universe, and boycotts now? ananda Mar 2015 #13

wait...wut? alphafemale Mar 2015 #15

because it's true. Every day, new restrictive, discriminatory laws are passed cali Mar 2015 #27

It is true, sadly. smirkymonkey Mar 2015 #61

and that is the question. And a fucking sad one it is. cali Mar 2015 #21

I don't know if this issue has been litigated yet dsc Mar 2015 #16

no, the issue is not quite new. Some of these laws have been on the books for years. cali Mar 2015 #23

I don't think any of the compelled speech laws have been litigated yet dsc Mar 2015 #25

that's a good question. But if not, why not? cali Mar 2015 #26

I am no expert dsc Mar 2015 #50

Because the Doctor can tell the patient jeff47 Mar 2015 #57

I suspect you are wrong. But regardless, these laws are atrocious and infringe cali Mar 2015 #66

you're blaming this on the entire male gender? Doctor_J Mar 2015 #18

No. I am not blaming all men. Way to misinterpret, dear. cali Mar 2015 #22

This excerpt from your OP must have me confused Doctor_J Mar 2015 #55

I think the point is that it's usually male politicians, with no medical smirkymonkey Mar 2015 #62

But has been pointed out, a woman sponsored this bill, many women politicians voted for it, Doctor_J Mar 2015 #63

Ever wonder why straight white males lean Republican? Cali_Democrat Mar 2015 #38

Stupid but as a thyroid patient LittleGirl Mar 2015 #28

uh. different as can be. Are doctors FORCED by law to lie about Synthroid? NO. cali Mar 2015 #29

I don't think your doctor was lying to you...but LittleGirl Mar 2015 #31

A misdiagnosis is not the same as a deliberate lie La Lioness Priyanka Mar 2015 #33

what? LittleGirl Mar 2015 #34

You were claiming it's a lie and the same thing as in the OP. IT DAMN WELL IS NOT. cali Mar 2015 #35

calm down LittleGirl Mar 2015 #36

I'll react as I wish. cali Mar 2015 #39

did you not see the OT portion of the comment? LittleGirl Mar 2015 #40

it's still not a lie though. they prescribed what the protocol says to prescribe, it didn't work La Lioness Priyanka Mar 2015 #67

What is the intention/purpose of this move? Dont call me Shirley Mar 2015 #30

to try and dissuade a woman from abortion- as are all the TRAP laws cali Mar 2015 #32

I suspect there is more to it than that. This bill is an absolute lie. There is no pharmaceutical Dont call me Shirley Mar 2015 #43

It's going to take the medical community to step in and fight this riderinthestorm Mar 2015 #41

I think, after decades of fighting, that a lot of us are tired. historylovr Mar 2015 #51

I've said it before and I will say it again. Stonepounder Mar 2015 #42

Except of course, a woman actually sponsored the bill. DirkGently Mar 2015 #44

Sorry, that still doesn't alter the fact that men have been in the forefront of cali Mar 2015 #47

So this woman's anti-abortion bill proves "MEN" are the problem? DirkGently Mar 2015 #49

No, and I didn't say that. I said that for decades men have been in the forefront of the cali Mar 2015 #53

Well a woman is in the "forefront" of this AZ bill you posted. DirkGently Mar 2015 #54

Yeah, that seems to have escaped the OP. Doctor_J Mar 2015 #56

one woman does not negate systematic misogyny. just like clarence thomas does not negate systemic La Lioness Priyanka Mar 2015 #68

If I were a doctor, what I�d be saying (if I were forced to say this crap) is: NYC Liberal Mar 2015 #45

Almost certainly a violation of the first amendment geek tragedy Mar 2015 #46

But it was Voted on and passed imthevicar Mar 2015 #48

K & R historylovr Mar 2015 #52

Let me put it this way, gentlemen: I'd like to see men as active in the pro-choice movement cali Mar 2015 #64