General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Hillary's taste for covering everything untransparent should really get Dems ask themselves. ... [View all]stone space
(6,498 posts)AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
Mail Message
On Sun Mar 29, 2015, 11:27 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
Hillary, Hillary, Hillary; Is there a problem?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6431999
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Most of this post is ok, but the third paragraph gives my pause as a standard rightwing talking point about Bill's past and telling us how feminists "should" react. Hide for rw crap, even if you agree with most of the post or not.
"Can feminists explain why they would want a woman in the White House who stands by her man while he continually disrespects her by screwing any woman who will stand still long enough for him to get the job done?"
JURY RESULTS
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sun Mar 29, 2015, 11:34 AM, and the Jury voted 5-2 to HIDE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: It's entirely a fair question.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Obvious Troll is obvious. I agree that it's right-wing crap.
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.