Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Can We Have An Open Honest Discussion About Progressives, Civil Rights, And Income Inequality ??? [View all]1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)12. I agree ...
I, typically, use the phrase "Income Inequity"; but, "economic justice" works, too.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
132 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Can We Have An Open Honest Discussion About Progressives, Civil Rights, And Income Inequality ??? [View all]
WillyT
Mar 2015
OP
I sometimes wonder if you think blocking economic justice will increase social justice
Fumesucker
Mar 2015
#7
I've spent time in both worlds, the one with heavy duty connections and the one without
Fumesucker
Mar 2015
#13
As you move up society your responsibility becomes less and less, you can get away with more
Fumesucker
Mar 2015
#86
+100000 Which illustrates how cynical and empty and manipulative the Third Way exhortations
woo me with science
Mar 2015
#62
That alert should be alerted on. It is an abuse of the Jury system and violates
sabrina 1
Mar 2015
#110
Excellent jury. I agree with juror #2 that the alerter should be suspended for calling a longtime
sabrina 1
Mar 2015
#109
The Third Way claim of caring most about women and minorities is a cynical, vicious lie.
woo me with science
Mar 2015
#14
Two plus two equals five! A predictable Orwellian, avoidant, disingenuous response.
woo me with science
Mar 2015
#31
More on the ACTUAL aftermath of neoliberal policies on women, children, and minorities.
woo me with science
Mar 2015
#46
I don't know what's worse. The OP using a rich, old white man to somehow "dispute" the validity
Number23
Mar 2015
#85
The thing about this thread: you've got posters of color, women and gay posters flat out
Number23
Mar 2015
#106
On top of the condescending bullshit is the most laughable suggestion of all-
bettyellen
Apr 2015
#129
This is the guy who told me 'rights don't matter if you need a job, can't eat your rights'
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2015
#52
No, I'm talking to you. Every time, you are circling the wagons for the upper crust and poo pooing
TheKentuckian
Mar 2015
#101
Yes, and Hillary did NOTHING for Walmart's women employees whilst on their BoD
closeupready
Mar 2015
#59
Equity in poverty and lack of opportunity is a sales pitch to sand off a few rough edges while
TheKentuckian
Mar 2015
#93
I season my greens with spices not with swine and my little girl isn't born yet but she is
TheKentuckian
Mar 2015
#96
+1. The whole point of triangulation is "how little can I offer you and still get your vote?"
winter is coming
Mar 2015
#34
+100000 It's a vicious, disingenuous scam, the neoliberal claim to care about civil rights
woo me with science
Mar 2015
#50
Can you explain to me how the legal discrimination in employment in 29 States against LGBT
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2015
#23
You notice not one of the people making these assertions is able to discuss specific points raised.
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2015
#45
As we're seeing in Indiana right now, economic rights ARE civil rights. [n/t]
Maedhros
Mar 2015
#108
Carlin was a rich white guy, worth millions and he was very aware that his counterparts who were
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2015
#42
Did you read what I wrote? Carlin does not say what the OP claims. Carlin did not shit on others
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2015
#48
And where's the part where he says those who are disenfranchised compared to George should not
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2015
#60
I don't think anyone is suggesting that Carlin "others wanting to have equal treatment was wrong"
FLPanhandle
Mar 2015
#63
But the OP is the one dividing people to serve rich politicians. Sorry. He exploited George to
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2015
#70
You never bothered to answer my first question to you in this thread. WTF indeed.
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2015
#111
Being held as an equal human being entitled to the same considerations and protections
MerryBlooms
Mar 2015
#57
For progressives it's not civil rights OR economic rights. It's AND. Neither should be ignored.
pampango
Mar 2015
#61
Please See Post #71... And... The Point I Was Making Was About The ThirdWay Theory...
WillyT
Mar 2015
#74
'Give THEM the rights that costs us no money'? Are you serious, straight man?
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2015
#112
I... Value Them Equally... It's The Roadblocks That Politicians (Republicans) Put Up...
WillyT
Mar 2015
#116
What good compassionate progressive does not like being called a racist and mysoginist?
WillTwain
Mar 2015
#103
I think that identity politics has largely been designed to distract us from economic populism.
lumberjack_jeff
Mar 2015
#115