Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(45,274 posts)

18. I'd maybe watch 3 minutes of the inevitable lowlights on YouTube.

Sun Mar 29, 2015, 06:10 PM

Mar 2015

Beyond that, I have to go get my fly rod ready for opening day.

And my wife has been nagging me about cleaning the basement.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

26 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Would you watch a very heavily moderated debate with RW wingnuts ? [View all] steve2470 Mar 2015 OP

Where's the entertainment value in that? Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2015 #1

it might be fun watching them sputter! nt steve2470 Mar 2015 #2

How dare you make me choose among kittens, weed and beer. TexasTowelie Mar 2015 #3

ha! nt steve2470 Mar 2015 #4

I always go with kittens first and beer second. House of Roberts Mar 2015 #26

I can't imagine a debate where right wingers stuck to facts. Arkansas Granny Mar 2015 #17

A debate with heavily MEDICATED rwingers, yes. HereSince1628 Mar 2015 #7

ha! nt steve2470 Mar 2015 #9

Rightwingers and facts are mutually exclusive. JaneyVee Mar 2015 #10

We need to know the crap between them. Expect SNL and others will feature Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #11

the past history of the participants ? nt steve2470 Mar 2015 #12

Hope the have some new lines except OOPS Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #15

good question! nt steve2470 Mar 2015 #14

Only if the Referee is allowed to pound the shit out of miscreants. leveymg Mar 2015 #16

I'd maybe watch 3 minutes of the inevitable lowlights on YouTube. Jackpine Radical Mar 2015 #18

Non sequitur - no Republican would ever agree to such a format. procon Mar 2015 #19

I think something along the lines of the proposed "prosecutorial" debate truebluegreen Mar 2015 #20

honestly DonCoquixote Mar 2015 #23

Except you can't make them stick to it, or none would agree to it JHB Mar 2015 #24

I say they use the 'trial by three shields' format Tyrs WolfDaemon Mar 2015 #25