Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)In Case You Missed This... 'NAFTA, TPP & The Clinton Global Initiative's "Free Trade" Activism' [View all]
NAFTA, TPP & The Clinton Global Initiative's "Free Trade" ActivismBy Gaius Publius - Crooks & Liars
1/21/15 11:36am

<snip>
Let's start with NAFTA, which everyone now knows was a jobs and trade-deficit disaster, and a billionaire pot of gold. It's likely though that you may not know the details, including the details of how it was sold. So a quick look back.
This is from a recent Huffington Post piece by Michele Swenson. She opens by looking at the 1990s and tying together President Bill Clinton, NAFTA-loving billionaire Pete Peterson (the one who hates Social Security), and the "prediction" before it was passed that NAFTA would create a million American jobs.
Pay attention also to the predicted shrinking trade deficit. That piece the trade-deficit piece is often lost. From the article (my emphasis throughout):
NAFTA promoters in the '90s promised increased U.S. exports and jobs, with shrinking trade deficits. Senior Fellows of the Peterson Institute for International Economics (PIIE), projected a NAFTA-induced trade surplus with Mexico, in turn, creating 170,000 new U.S. jobs by 1995. Within two years of NAFTA's passage, PIIE prognosticators readjusted their projection of new NAFTA-created jobs downward to "zero." The same group, created by billionaire corporate cheerleader Pete Peterson, is again forecasting increased exports and jobs if the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) is passed.
Referencing 19 serious pre-NAFTA economic studies projecting zero net job loss if NAFTA were to pass, President Bill Clinton estimated the creation of 200,000 U.S. jobs within two years, and 1 million within five years, based on a projected export boom to Mexico. Twenty years after Clinton signed NAFTA into law, Global Trade Watch reports a 450 percent increase in the U.S. trade deficit, resulting in the export of almost one million jobs, and downward pressure on wages.
In fact, the average annual U.S. agricultural trade deficit with Mexico and Canada ballooned to almost three times the pre-NAFTA level, to $975 million within two decades of NAFTA's passage, eliminating an estimated one million net U.S. jobs by 2004, reports the Economic Policy Institute. As U.S. food processors moved to Mexico to take advantage of low wages, U.S. food imports soared. Public Citizen has tallied in a comprehensive report the promises by U.S. corporations to create specific numbers of jobs if NAFTA passed, and the consequent record of many of the same firms who relocated jobs to Mexico and Canada.
Referencing 19 serious pre-NAFTA economic studies projecting zero net job loss if NAFTA were to pass, President Bill Clinton estimated the creation of 200,000 U.S. jobs within two years, and 1 million within five years, based on a projected export boom to Mexico. Twenty years after Clinton signed NAFTA into law, Global Trade Watch reports a 450 percent increase in the U.S. trade deficit, resulting in the export of almost one million jobs, and downward pressure on wages.
In fact, the average annual U.S. agricultural trade deficit with Mexico and Canada ballooned to almost three times the pre-NAFTA level, to $975 million within two decades of NAFTA's passage, eliminating an estimated one million net U.S. jobs by 2004, reports the Economic Policy Institute. As U.S. food processors moved to Mexico to take advantage of low wages, U.S. food imports soared. Public Citizen has tallied in a comprehensive report the promises by U.S. corporations to create specific numbers of jobs if NAFTA passed, and the consequent record of many of the same firms who relocated jobs to Mexico and Canada.
So let's fix three pieces in our brains:
▪ Before NAFTA passed, Bill Clinton, Pete Peterson and a raft of "pre-NAFTA economic studies" predicted one million new jobs, increased exports, and a lower trade deficit.
▪ After NAFTA passed, we lost one million jobs, increased imports, and increased the trade deficit by a factor of almost 5.
▪ Pro-NAFTA companies, who promised to create new jobs here, moved existing jobs abroad almost as soon as it was signed.
The third piece counts. Clinton claims to have been mistaken on free-trade policy...
<snip>
Much More: http://crooksandliars.com/2015/01/nafta-tpp-clinton-global-initiatives-free
82 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In Case You Missed This... 'NAFTA, TPP & The Clinton Global Initiative's "Free Trade" Activism' [View all]
WillyT
Mar 2015
OP
An oversimplified but probably fairly correct correlation seems to be
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Mar 2015
#1
Yep... Remember... NAFTA Had Import/Export/Labor Fairness/And Environmental Codes Included...
WillyT
Mar 2015
#2
They mocked the crap out of Ross Perot for saying there would be a giant sucking sound of
GoneFishin
Mar 2015
#3
It's like they really have no idea how these policies are creating economic
Baitball Blogger
Mar 2015
#4
the clintons are out for themselves. bubbles have nothing to do with it; they're not
ND-Dem
Mar 2015
#32
Thanks for posting WillyT! Grayson: "We are creating tens of millions of jobs in other countries...
RiverLover
Mar 2015
#7
It's not a matter of pragmatism, it is a mental illness so it is not a rational behavior.
GoneFishin
Mar 2015
#42
"Pro-NAFTA companies...moved existing jobs abroad almost as soon as it was signed."
cheapdate
Mar 2015
#15
I don't deny many poor, mentally ill, and those with skills no longer in demand were forgotten..
Hoyt
Mar 2015
#24
Anything that pays less than the equivalent of $15/hou or is involuntarily part timer n/t
eridani
Mar 2015
#35
You don't believe jobs were going overseas before NAFTA, people weren't buying foreign cars or
Hoyt
Mar 2015
#46
Ypu obviously haven't read any of the agreements. They include standards for worker rights.
Hoyt
Mar 2015
#49
Mexico is better off now, although not as they should be. Otherwise, Mx wouldn't have begged for TPP
Hoyt
Mar 2015
#69
I think your experience is a bit limited. Economies are much larger than you or me.
Hoyt
Mar 2015
#73
Unless you were one of the 330K+ people in Ohio who lost a good manufacturing job.
pa28
Mar 2015
#59
It's not Pete Peterson alone, it's the Clinton Global Initiative that's working in concert.
hedda_foil
Mar 2015
#29
It's only been in effect 2 years, some of the provisions won't go into affect for a few more years.
Hoyt
Mar 2015
#54
Do you think the absence of trade agreements would help the vast majority of workers
Hoyt
Mar 2015
#57