Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: In Case You Missed This... 'NAFTA, TPP & The Clinton Global Initiative's "Free Trade" Activism' [View all]marym625
(17,997 posts)5. When it comes to supporting
A secret, corporate written, fast tracked, agreement, why ANYONE would do ANYTHING but want to put the kibosh on it until it is fully known, is absolutely beyond me.
Better yet, why support it considering what we do know?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
82 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
In Case You Missed This... 'NAFTA, TPP & The Clinton Global Initiative's "Free Trade" Activism' [View all]
WillyT
Mar 2015
OP
An oversimplified but probably fairly correct correlation seems to be
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Mar 2015
#1
Yep... Remember... NAFTA Had Import/Export/Labor Fairness/And Environmental Codes Included...
WillyT
Mar 2015
#2
They mocked the crap out of Ross Perot for saying there would be a giant sucking sound of
GoneFishin
Mar 2015
#3
It's like they really have no idea how these policies are creating economic
Baitball Blogger
Mar 2015
#4
the clintons are out for themselves. bubbles have nothing to do with it; they're not
ND-Dem
Mar 2015
#32
Thanks for posting WillyT! Grayson: "We are creating tens of millions of jobs in other countries...
RiverLover
Mar 2015
#7
It's not a matter of pragmatism, it is a mental illness so it is not a rational behavior.
GoneFishin
Mar 2015
#42
"Pro-NAFTA companies...moved existing jobs abroad almost as soon as it was signed."
cheapdate
Mar 2015
#15
I don't deny many poor, mentally ill, and those with skills no longer in demand were forgotten..
Hoyt
Mar 2015
#24
Anything that pays less than the equivalent of $15/hou or is involuntarily part timer n/t
eridani
Mar 2015
#35
You don't believe jobs were going overseas before NAFTA, people weren't buying foreign cars or
Hoyt
Mar 2015
#46
Ypu obviously haven't read any of the agreements. They include standards for worker rights.
Hoyt
Mar 2015
#49
Mexico is better off now, although not as they should be. Otherwise, Mx wouldn't have begged for TPP
Hoyt
Mar 2015
#69
I think your experience is a bit limited. Economies are much larger than you or me.
Hoyt
Mar 2015
#73
Unless you were one of the 330K+ people in Ohio who lost a good manufacturing job.
pa28
Mar 2015
#59
It's not Pete Peterson alone, it's the Clinton Global Initiative that's working in concert.
hedda_foil
Mar 2015
#29
It's only been in effect 2 years, some of the provisions won't go into affect for a few more years.
Hoyt
Mar 2015
#54
Do you think the absence of trade agreements would help the vast majority of workers
Hoyt
Mar 2015
#57