Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: In Case You Missed This... 'NAFTA, TPP & The Clinton Global Initiative's "Free Trade" Activism' [View all]hedda_foil
(16,999 posts)29. It's not Pete Peterson alone, it's the Clinton Global Initiative that's working in concert.
The OP references a HuffPo article from last year that brings it all full circle:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michele-swenson/nafta-the-transpacific-clinton_b_5523327.html
NAFTA, the Trans-Pacific Partnership and the Clinton Global Initiative
Free Trade" Advocates Convene at Clinton Global Initiative
Echoing promises of lowered trade barriers, improved labor conditions and environmental protections made by NAFTA advocates two decades earlier, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in Hanoi, Viet Nam in 2012 promoted the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the most far-reaching trade agreement ever, encompassing 12 Pacific Rim countries. Secretary Clinton stated support for free expression online, and pronounced, "Democracy and prosperity go hand-in-hand," even as the backroom dealings of hundreds of corporate lobbyists have engaged in writing the TPP to challenge everything from Net Neutrality to democratic process and state sovereignty. An amplification of NAFTA provisions, leaked segments of the secretive treaty reveal that wholesale powers granted by the TPP to corporations would permit them to sue governments for alleged lost profits in special international tribunals that bypass the U.S. court system, and to advocate overturn of regulatory laws intended to protect people and the environment.
As the Clinton Global Initiative convenes in Denver June 23-25, it brings together some of the same financial hard-hitters who cheerleaded NAFTA into being, and seek to do the same for the TPP. Among them, Robert Rubin, chief economic advisor to the Clinton White House, is listed as a participant in a panel discussion "Exploring what it will take for the U.S. to retain a position of global economic leadership in an increasingly complex world."
Noble Energy, engaged in worldwide oil and gas exploration and production, is co-funder with Anadarko Petroleum of whitewashed pro-fracking ads under the acronym "CRED" (Coloradans for Responsible Energy Development). At the CGI event, Noble's CEO is scheduled to host a discussion of "the ways in which the North American energy revolution is altering the geopolitical, economic, and energy policy landscapes," seeking reexamination of "the traditional social and regulatory frameworks in which energy is produced, consumed and exported," while touting the "low-carbon profile" of natural gas (no doubt minus consideration of externalities of hydrofracking -- the overall costs to taxpayers and the environment).
Another forum examines the United States' "changing relationship to its natural resources - "chiefly... vast oil and gas deposits that will enable the U.S. to be near energy independence within the next two decades." Still another -- the use of "public-private partnerships to improve education, modernize infrastructure, and advance environmentally-conscious energy production."
A CGI Breakout Session has a panel of CEOs considering "Behavioral Economics," how to use "behavioral modifications [to] yield significant impact" -- "ways that the public and private sectors can utilize behavioral psychology to create a healthier, greener, and more financially-secure America..." Highlighted are "successful nudge strategies that can be applied widely throughout the United States" that gently urge people toward a desired behavior. Promoting healthier foods (which can also be subjectively defined) is one thing. Extending this technique to the backroom dealings around a trade deal like the TPP, it is more ominous to regard corporate manipulation with the intent of overriding laws and regulations passed to protect people and the environment, in service of the corporate bottom line.
And much, much more. It's sickening, but it rings all too true.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
82 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
In Case You Missed This... 'NAFTA, TPP & The Clinton Global Initiative's "Free Trade" Activism' [View all]
WillyT
Mar 2015
OP
An oversimplified but probably fairly correct correlation seems to be
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Mar 2015
#1
Yep... Remember... NAFTA Had Import/Export/Labor Fairness/And Environmental Codes Included...
WillyT
Mar 2015
#2
They mocked the crap out of Ross Perot for saying there would be a giant sucking sound of
GoneFishin
Mar 2015
#3
It's like they really have no idea how these policies are creating economic
Baitball Blogger
Mar 2015
#4
the clintons are out for themselves. bubbles have nothing to do with it; they're not
ND-Dem
Mar 2015
#32
Thanks for posting WillyT! Grayson: "We are creating tens of millions of jobs in other countries...
RiverLover
Mar 2015
#7
It's not a matter of pragmatism, it is a mental illness so it is not a rational behavior.
GoneFishin
Mar 2015
#42
"Pro-NAFTA companies...moved existing jobs abroad almost as soon as it was signed."
cheapdate
Mar 2015
#15
I don't deny many poor, mentally ill, and those with skills no longer in demand were forgotten..
Hoyt
Mar 2015
#24
Anything that pays less than the equivalent of $15/hou or is involuntarily part timer n/t
eridani
Mar 2015
#35
You don't believe jobs were going overseas before NAFTA, people weren't buying foreign cars or
Hoyt
Mar 2015
#46
Ypu obviously haven't read any of the agreements. They include standards for worker rights.
Hoyt
Mar 2015
#49
Mexico is better off now, although not as they should be. Otherwise, Mx wouldn't have begged for TPP
Hoyt
Mar 2015
#69
I think your experience is a bit limited. Economies are much larger than you or me.
Hoyt
Mar 2015
#73
Unless you were one of the 330K+ people in Ohio who lost a good manufacturing job.
pa28
Mar 2015
#59
It's not Pete Peterson alone, it's the Clinton Global Initiative that's working in concert.
hedda_foil
Mar 2015
#29
It's only been in effect 2 years, some of the provisions won't go into affect for a few more years.
Hoyt
Mar 2015
#54
Do you think the absence of trade agreements would help the vast majority of workers
Hoyt
Mar 2015
#57