Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: 8.1% [View all]

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
15. Krugman:
Fri May 4, 2012, 09:39 AM
May 2012
Notice that I said “government in America,” not “the federal government.” The federal government has been pursuing what amount to contractionary policies as the last vestiges of the Obama stimulus fade out, but the big cuts have come at the state and local level...We’re talking big numbers here. If government employment under Mr. Obama had grown at Reagan-era rates, 1.3 million more Americans would be working as schoolteachers, firefighters, police officers, etc., than are currently employed in such jobs.

And once you take the effects of public spending on private employment into account, a rough estimate is that the unemployment rate would be 1.5 percentage points lower than it is, or below 7 percent — significantly better than the Reagan economy at this stage.


More: http://sync.democraticunderground.com/1002385152

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8.1% [View all] bigtree May 2012 OP
Great news malaise May 2012 #1
After 2 weeks of being unemployed safeinOhio May 2012 #2
yes! bigtree May 2012 #4
Congrats! BumRushDaShow May 2012 #5
Such good news RockaFowler May 2012 #8
K&R... SidDithers May 2012 #3
meh, people just stopped... Schema Thing May 2012 #9
Pop Pop Pop!!! Hater heads exploding again. JoePhilly May 2012 #6
and romney whines....fug the thugs spanone May 2012 #7
"Things would be getting better... Proud Liberal Dem May 2012 #17
Bad news pinqy May 2012 #10
Break out the Champagne! slackmaster May 2012 #11
were employment numbers under Bush criticized this much? GusFring May 2012 #12
Yes, Bush took heat though the numbers were lower. Much criticism was aimed at their accuracy. slackmaster May 2012 #18
In '08 It Didn't Matter... KharmaTrain May 2012 #20
I am curious what the unemployment numbers would be if doc03 May 2012 #13
Krugman: ProSense May 2012 #15
I wonder how better things would be if Repubs in Congress weren't trying to topple the gov from within GusFring May 2012 #16
BLS: ProSense May 2012 #14
I helped with that number.. Fumesucker May 2012 #19
NYTimes: Rate dropped because more workers dropped out of labor force brentspeak May 2012 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»8.1%»Reply #15