General Discussion

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)

9. Poor billionaire and money launderer sues, loses, and I'm supposed to care?

Reply to Ichingcarpenter (Original post)

Mon Mar 30, 2015, 12:19 PM

Mar 2015

Not for anything, but before you start feeling sorry for the Plaintiff, Google him....he filed a bullshit lawsuit, and it was dismissed, properly.

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=victor.restis.iran&source=web&cd=24&ved=0CGYQFjAX&url=http%3A%2F%2Fpdfserver.amlaw.com%2Fnlj%2Firan_secrets_20150323.pdf&ei=1HQZVfDdEMinNqTlgegN&usg=AFQjCNEzEUyOLFTgP71hKzlUB6L5bLmIMg&sig2=gtCjxNHm-f3pvkDNqipiPQ

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

39 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

A court case so secret, US Govt says it can't go on [View all] Ichingcarpenter Mar 2015 OP

Well I'm not worried. Savannahmann Mar 2015 #1

The depth of corruption we face woo me with science Mar 2015 #2

What part of the Constitution covers Secret Trials? Octafish Mar 2015 #3

Considering I found the trial docs on google, I wonder how msanthrope Mar 2015 #11

So what? Octafish Mar 2015 #33

You are entitled to that document if it contains exculpatory evidence msanthrope Mar 2015 #34

I think you just described what happened in this case. ieoeja Mar 2015 #35

I smell CIA/MIC astroturf hootinholler Mar 2015 #4

I read the ruling. I have to agree with the judge. nt msanthrope Mar 2015 #10

Quelle surprise... riderinthestorm Mar 2015 #12

The Plaintiff is a billionaire money launderer with a bullshit claim msanthrope Mar 2015 #14

I'm concerned about an ugly turn of events by our increasingly secretive govt riderinthestorm Mar 2015 #17

So you finally googled the Plaintiff? Look, he's smart....if I msanthrope Mar 2015 #19

Yes I did. And it's obviously NOT a bullshit claim since the case can't be tried riderinthestorm Mar 2015 #23

Why do you think it's the NGO and not the Kaplan discovery? msanthrope Mar 2015 #26

That's nice hootinholler Mar 2015 #25

Already did your googling for you.....see post #9. nt msanthrope Mar 2015 #27

K&R riderinthestorm Mar 2015 #5

I have no words Amishman Mar 2015 #6

Everything secret degenerates, even the administration of justice; Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2015 #7

I wonder if Obama is aware of this case Oilwellian Mar 2015 #8

Poor billionaire and money launderer sues, loses, and I'm supposed to care? msanthrope Mar 2015 #9

This tactic of smearing everyone who challenges the deep state is getting stale riderinthestorm Mar 2015 #13

Your concern for the billionaire money launderer who stole from the Greek msanthrope Mar 2015 #15

You never fail to amuse msanthrope (sic) riderinthestorm Mar 2015 #18

Yeah.....and next you'll tell me OJ is innocent. Have you finally read msanthrope Mar 2015 #20

Is that the best you can do msanthrope (sic)? riderinthestorm Mar 2015 #24

And coming from a supposed attorney Oilwellian Mar 2015 #16

An attorney who doesn't feel sorry for some billionaire Plaintiff, whose money msanthrope Mar 2015 #22

You do realize, you're siding with an entity that has... Oilwellian Mar 2015 #29

I'm siding with the intervenor, the DOJ. That's who won dismissal. nt msanthrope Mar 2015 #30

I can tell you why you should care in one word. Donald Ian Rankin Mar 2015 #37

Already done....Ellsberg, Zuckerbraun, and Doe. The opinion is worth msanthrope Mar 2015 #38

So........ DeSwiss Mar 2015 #21

LOL obviously the CIA said kill this in court. Rex Mar 2015 #28

But apparently the CIA didn't mind the information getting out. Savannahmann Mar 2015 #32

It's totally crazy right? Rex Mar 2015 #36

The first and last time I encountered this sort of thing I ran like hell in the opposite direction. hunter Mar 2015 #31

We gotta change the site so we can rec replies. Savannahmann Mar 2015 #39