Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: A court case so secret, US Govt says it can't go on [View all]ieoeja
(9,748 posts)35. I think you just described what happened in this case.
One of the strategies pursued by United Against is a campaign to "name and shame" entities that trade with Iran.
The organization named Restis, who in turn sued United Against for falsely claiming his companies were "front men for the illicit activities of the Iranian regime."
Later in the article it explicitly states the government is protecting the source that provided the information on Restis to United Against Nuclear Iran. Since UA could not defend itself from the lawsuit without exposing an intelligence source working for the United States in Iran, the government asked the court to dismiss the trial.
"What do you do when a document the government classifies Top Secret is needed for your defense?"
You hope the government intervenes on your behalf in the case. And in this instance, they just did.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
39 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I'm concerned about an ugly turn of events by our increasingly secretive govt
riderinthestorm
Mar 2015
#17
Yes I did. And it's obviously NOT a bullshit claim since the case can't be tried
riderinthestorm
Mar 2015
#23
This tactic of smearing everyone who challenges the deep state is getting stale
riderinthestorm
Mar 2015
#13
An attorney who doesn't feel sorry for some billionaire Plaintiff, whose money
msanthrope
Mar 2015
#22