General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Women only: Regarding the use of the term 'girls' to describe women. [View all]Mc Mike
(9,245 posts)Last edited Sat May 5, 2012, 04:40 AM - Edit history (1)
I agree with your 'minority view' assessment. The opposite side seems to be ape-ing repug tactics, here. A small vocal minority that's wrong, about everything, at the top of their lungs. If the OP was such a non-issue idea that was beneath contempt, why bother to look at it, or come in here? There are thousands of other OP fishes, in the DU sea.
On edit, due to uneccesary seeming snakiness on my part, added:
I told D a bunch of places where I agreed with him, so if he's 'wrong about everything', that makes me a hypocrite or liar. I agreed with him about the wrongness of what he perceived as attacks from DU Women's issues posters. Red and sea provided links and info that disproved his perceptions, so I was really agreeing with his hypothetical list of possible wrong things that someone could say. I just don't agree with his perceptions of reality.
He probably doesn't want me to anyway, since he later assessed me as 'nuts', and who wants a crazy person to confirm their perceptions? That would be bad for his self-esteem, mental health-wise.