Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LiberalArkie

(19,756 posts)
23. Just posted on Arkansas Times a little bit ago...
Tue Mar 31, 2015, 03:51 PM
Mar 2015

Gov. Asa Hutchinson has vetoed SB 79, a bill that was intended to "protect the names, voices, signatures, photographs, and likenesses of the citizens of the state from exploitation and unauthorized commercial use without the citizen’s consent."

After reviewing the bill, Hutchinson apparently agreed that the bill was too broadly written. In a statement, he said:

“In its current form, the bill unnecessarily restricts free expression and thus could have a chilling effect on freedom of speech and freedom of the press. In addition, SB79 exempts certain types of noncommercial speech while failing to exempt other forms of noncommercial speech. The absence of these exemptions could result in unnecessary litigation and suppress Arkansans who engage in artistic expression.”

The bill was authored by Sen. Jon Woods (R-Springdale) and Rep. Greg Leding (D-Fayetteville). Leding said earlier in the session that it was prompted by the family of Frank Broyles, concerned about the potential use of his likeness for commercial purposes.


http://www.arktimes.com/ArkansasBlog/archives/2015/03/31/bill-that-may-have-hindered-public-photography-vetoed-by-hutchinson


Note: In all the talk about the bill it was always people stealing the likness of Arkansas people without their permission. I believe there was another motive behind it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Is the actual agenda to make it illegal for citizens to film police? phantom power Mar 2015 #1
Yes. libdem4life Mar 2015 #3
That was my first thought Frances Mar 2015 #4
And to prohibit filming city council meetings, prohibit filming occupy protests LiberalArkie Mar 2015 #6
how does one enforce that? salin Mar 2015 #7
the gestapo has a lot of influence in government nt msongs Mar 2015 #11
When are the RED States seceding? Politicalboi Mar 2015 #2
I would think the state fish-wraps would be up in arms about this. sdfernando Mar 2015 #5
The stupidity is deep on this packman Mar 2015 #8
Let's see, now I get to add Arkansas to the list of never-visit states, Dont call me Shirley Mar 2015 #9
I think I could be happy yuiyoshida Mar 2015 #15
CA is good traveling! Dont call me Shirley Mar 2015 #19
I cannot imagine how this will be constitutional. hifiguy Mar 2015 #10
It's not at all..... snooper2 Mar 2015 #18
Really, they just don't want any photos of police brutality. nt kelliekat44 Mar 2015 #12
no google maps of Arkansas! d_r Mar 2015 #13
Yeh... yuiyoshida Mar 2015 #17
Carry a gun? No problem. Carry a camera? You're under arrest! n/t Binkie The Clown Mar 2015 #14
This will help law enforcement out, but not in a good way toward citizens. Rex Mar 2015 #16
Apparently none of the responders to this OP bothered to read the link or check further on ChisolmTrailDem Mar 2015 #20
Just posted on Arkansas Times a little bit ago... LiberalArkie Mar 2015 #23
we are ready! Baclava Mar 2015 #21
wow Liberal_in_LA Mar 2015 #22
In other Arkansas News LiberalArkie Mar 2015 #24
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Arkansas Senate Passes Bi...»Reply #23