General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: How utterly @#$%ed up is it that two-thirds [View all]JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)You assume that BMW pays $28 and hour with good benefits based on trade agreements.
We could just as well assume that BMW is paying well because it is selling its cars in the US and it makes sense, therefore, to make the cars in the US.
Saves on transportation costs, and BMW enjoys the loyalty of Americans who recognize that BMW makes the cars they buy in the US with American labor. And that BMW contributes to our tax base.
If we accept my assumptions then we do not need free trade agreements. BMW can invest in the US and produce products in the US without the TPP or any trade agreement. BMW can obey our laws, respect our democracy and remain a popular company with popular products in the US.
We do not need the TPP in order to encourage foreign investment in the US. In fact, the TPP will encourage more outflow of investment money than inflow. Just as NAFTA did.
Please stop using false logic. Please stop relying on false assumptions.
We do not need the TPP in order to encourage foreign investment in the US.