Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: arkansas passes anti gay law like indiana [View all]herding cats
(20,047 posts)10. The governor is talking about a compromise
Could a compromise be brewing on HB 1228, the so-called "religious conscience" bill that opponents argue would offer additional legal protection for discrimination against gay people? The following is what we can report based on multiple sources at the Capitol speaking on background:
Gov. Asa Hutchinson appears to be looking for a way out of the current controversy. Particularly with the increasing volume of media coverage and corporate backlash around the similar law in Indiana, the governor has real concerns about the law's impact on economic development, sources say.
In separate meetings this morning, the governor and his chief of staff, Michael Lamoureux, met with two backers of the bill Sen. Bart Hester and Rep. Bob Ballinger and two opponents of the bill Rep. Warwick Sabin and Sen. Joyce Elliott.
The governor is potentially interested in the concept, also floated by Gov. Mike Pence in Indiana, of adding a "clarification" amendment to the bill that would expressly state that the law does not authorize discrimination or make it lawful to discriminate. The amendment would expressly list various categories race, religion, old age, etc. and would include sexual orientation and gender identity.
Given that Ballinger and the bill's proponents have said over and over that the bill is not intended to protect discrimination indeed, he claims it's only about preventing discrimination this would appear to be a change in line with their stated purpose, but sources say they are still resistant to such an amendment (Ballinger rejected the idea yesterday in committee and thus far today has given every indication that he plans to proceed with the bill as is). Hutchinson is reportedly making the pitch around the effort to recruit business to the state, but it's unclear at this stage whether the governor's muscle can push a compromise through.
http://www.arktimes.com/ArkansasBlog/archives/2015/03/31/governor-exploring-possibility-of-compromise-on-hb1228
Gov. Asa Hutchinson appears to be looking for a way out of the current controversy. Particularly with the increasing volume of media coverage and corporate backlash around the similar law in Indiana, the governor has real concerns about the law's impact on economic development, sources say.
In separate meetings this morning, the governor and his chief of staff, Michael Lamoureux, met with two backers of the bill Sen. Bart Hester and Rep. Bob Ballinger and two opponents of the bill Rep. Warwick Sabin and Sen. Joyce Elliott.
The governor is potentially interested in the concept, also floated by Gov. Mike Pence in Indiana, of adding a "clarification" amendment to the bill that would expressly state that the law does not authorize discrimination or make it lawful to discriminate. The amendment would expressly list various categories race, religion, old age, etc. and would include sexual orientation and gender identity.
Given that Ballinger and the bill's proponents have said over and over that the bill is not intended to protect discrimination indeed, he claims it's only about preventing discrimination this would appear to be a change in line with their stated purpose, but sources say they are still resistant to such an amendment (Ballinger rejected the idea yesterday in committee and thus far today has given every indication that he plans to proceed with the bill as is). Hutchinson is reportedly making the pitch around the effort to recruit business to the state, but it's unclear at this stage whether the governor's muscle can push a compromise through.
http://www.arktimes.com/ArkansasBlog/archives/2015/03/31/governor-exploring-possibility-of-compromise-on-hb1228
***UPDATE: One note that might be buried in the liveblog: it's possible that the lawmakers may still try to cut a deal with the governor around anti-discrimination provisions even if HB 1228 passes today. If so, they would do it via a separate bill rather than an amendment. Of course, that means getting a bunch of GOPs to vote for legislation codifying anti-discrimination rules, including for LGBT folks. So
we'll see.
http://www.arktimes.com/ArkansasBlog/archives/2015/03/31/hb-1228-on-house-agenda-this-afternoon
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
37 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
we can hope... but those with the strategy of pushing this legislation (ala THIS wording)
salin
Mar 2015
#33
that is something... am glad that the backlash up here (and the now very public proposed
salin
Mar 2015
#13
Time to find out what the "big guys" think about this, now that the disavowal has taken on a life of
libdem4life
Mar 2015
#9
bet its Alec or the dude from Kansas who wrote the self-deportation immigration laws for
salin
Mar 2015
#14
chip chip chip. first take away business rights....consult 1933 history for details nt
msongs
Mar 2015
#23
If any of you think this is bad, imagine the next SC appointment being made by a con.
NoJusticeNoPeace
Mar 2015
#26