Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PufPuf23

(9,733 posts)
36. Thank you paulk
Fri May 4, 2012, 01:09 PM
May 2012

From http://www.readersupportednews.org/opinion2/303-211/10896-fate-of-japan-and-the-whole-world-depends-on-no-4-reactor


I asked top spent-fuel pools expert Mr. Robert Alvarez, former Senior Policy Adviser to the Secretary and Deputy Assistant Secretary for National Security and the Environment at the U.S. Department of Energy, for an explanation of the potential impact of the 11,421 rods.

I received an astounding response from Mr. Alvarez [updated 4/5/12]:


In recent times, more information about the spent fuel situation at the Fukushima-Dai-Ichi site has become known. It is my understanding that of the 1,532 spent fuel assemblies in reactor No. 304 assemblies are fresh and unirradiated. This then leaves 1,231 irradiated spent fuel rods in pool No. 4, which contain roughly 37 million curies (~1.4E+18 Becquerel) of long-lived radioactivity. The No. 4 pool is about 100 feet above ground, is structurally damaged and is exposed to the open elements. If an earthquake or other event were to cause this pool to drain this could result in a catastrophic radiological fire involving nearly 10 times the amount of Cs-137 released by the Chernobyl accident.

The infrastructure to safely remove this material was destroyed as it was at the other three reactors. Spent reactor fuel cannot be simply lifted into the air by a crane as if it were routine cargo. In order to prevent severe radiation exposures, fires and possible explosions, it must be transferred at all times in water and heavily shielded structures into dry casks.. As this has never been done before, the removal of the spent fuel from the pools at the damaged Fukushima-Dai-Ichi reactors will require a major and time-consuming re-construction effort and will be charting in unknown waters. Despite the enormous destruction cased at the Da-Ichi site, dry casks holding a smaller amount of spent fuel appear to be unscathed.

Based on U.S. Energy Department data, assuming a total of 11,138 spent fuel assemblies are being stored at the Dai-Ichi site, nearly all, which is in pools. They contain roughly 336 million curies (~1.2 E+19 Bq) of long-lived radioactivity. About 134 million curies is Cesium-137 - roughly 85 times the amount of Cs-137 released at the Chernobyl accident as estimated by the U.S. National Council on Radiation Protection (NCRP). The total spent reactor fuel inventory at the Fukushima-Daichi site contains nearly half of the total amount of Cs-137 estimated by the NCRP to have been released by all atmospheric nuclear weapons testing, Chernobyl, and world-wide reprocessing plants (~270 million curies or ~9.9 E+18 Becquerel

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Well, start working on that evacuation plan now. aquart May 2012 #1
The contests islands (with the Russians) may be on their short list of places to go to. nt CK_John May 2012 #2
What and where is this? murielm99 May 2012 #3
What? murielm99 May 2012 #3
He's referring to the Kuriles, which have been disputed since the end of the war. (nt) Posteritatis May 2012 #6
The war is not over... sorcrow May 2012 #33
I believe the moon is made of cheese. nt Bonobo May 2012 #5
Specifically, Wensleydale. Robb May 2012 #10
Like the reactor didn't melt down???? CK_John May 2012 #11
That's my name... Wensleydale. nt Bonobo May 2012 #12
Sorry. We're fresh out of Wensleydale. MineralMan May 2012 #16
ROFL alcibiades_mystery May 2012 #31
Hysteria can be hysterical. (nt) Posteritatis May 2012 #7
Post the facts behind your claim!!! Logical May 2012 #8
As I stated, it is my belief that this will need to take place. nt CK_John May 2012 #9
What is the basis for your belief? bighart May 2012 #13
maybe this? paulk May 2012 #14
Thank you paulk PufPuf23 May 2012 #36
2 events in the last week or so. An announcement of plans last week of moving CK_John May 2012 #17
Japan Has No Plan to Halt U.S. Beef Imports on Mad-Cow Case Javaman May 2012 #22
yes and based on your explanation, that belief seems to be an act of faith CreekDog May 2012 #43
Shouldn't this be in the "creative spectulation" forum? Javaman May 2012 #15
I think it is very, very real and will unsettle world affairs for some time. nt CK_John May 2012 #18
While the situation in Japan has yet to fully play out Javaman May 2012 #19
So what, this not LBN. nt CK_John May 2012 #20
Correct, it's not, but you are also speculating on nothing other than your opinion. Javaman May 2012 #21
Asahi TV: “Unbelievable” If Unit 4 pool gets a crack from quake and leaks, it would be end for Tokyo flamingdem May 2012 #23
As I stated above... Javaman May 2012 #26
Moving 30,000 Marines (Japanese goal for 60 yrs) is not spectulation. Just CK_John May 2012 #24
I guess you ignored my post at #22. Javaman May 2012 #27
Missed it while I was wondering if C# is better than Java and who will end up owning Jave, CK_John May 2012 #28
ahh the old use of the non-sequitur. Javaman May 2012 #29
its not 'creative spec' that Japan is in a whole heap of big trouble Whisp May 2012 #30
I have no attitude... Javaman May 2012 #32
the attitude is because of gradiose predictions without any reasoning why CreekDog May 2012 #44
I think that I remember hearing that Chernobyl contaminated Autumn May 2012 #25
What can be done to contain the damage at Fukushima? Bake May 2012 #34
I believe in Santa Claus! n/t zappaman May 2012 #35
I saw the title of your OP and was interested in reading the explanation CreekDog May 2012 #37
Took a while for my least favorite cyber staker to show up, what you do with any info CK_John May 2012 #38
the grander the prediction, the more evidence one expects to see to support it CreekDog May 2012 #39
Just because you never seem to have an opinion but think I'm making grand predictions that are CK_John May 2012 #41
you wrote two sentences and i wrote two sentences back CreekDog May 2012 #42
I think you are wrong. The basis for my opinion can be found below. NCTraveler May 2012 #40
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I believe Japan will be f...»Reply #36