Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hunter

(40,829 posts)
66. Half a century on now...
Wed Apr 1, 2015, 07:16 PM
Apr 2015

... I've never been able to convince deeply entrenched dingbats otherwise.




Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Considering FDA's severe limits on calling an existing product "improved," this stance seems weak. Buzz Clik Mar 2015 #1
No get the red out Mar 2015 #2
So, if someone dies using a homeopathic asthma treatment, that's ok? HuckleB Mar 2015 #5
Not my decision get the red out Mar 2015 #12
So you don't think regulation matters. HuckleB Mar 2015 #13
Not on non-toxic items get the red out Mar 2015 #18
Non-toxic doesn't mean safe. HuckleB Mar 2015 #20
Not strange get the red out Mar 2015 #21
And your disagreement indicates that you are ok with people being harmed by said products. HuckleB Mar 2015 #23
Should we ban everything get the red out Mar 2015 #28
Should we ban scams that can harm people's health? HuckleB Mar 2015 #59
Then the question becomes, who is scamming you? What if it's the FDA? SomethingFishy Apr 2015 #64
Yes, strange. NuclearDem Mar 2015 #24
It doesn't take anything get the red out Mar 2015 #25
Holy crap, that was impressive. NuclearDem Mar 2015 #32
People have freedoms get the red out Mar 2015 #33
Holy hell, you're on a roll. NuclearDem Mar 2015 #35
Please think critically about this. phil89 Mar 2015 #54
And harm comes from the FDA not approving natural remedies SomethingFishy Apr 2015 #65
How about a clear and readable warning that the product is useless? nt. Warren Stupidity Mar 2015 #27
Fine with me get the red out Mar 2015 #30
*woosh* NuclearDem Mar 2015 #34
Monday is pretty much the best day available... LanternWaste Mar 2015 #36
Uhm, so consumer protections against fraud shouldn't exist? Humanist_Activist Mar 2015 #46
no - the placebo effect works on some Romeo.lima333 Mar 2015 #3
The placebo effect only works on subjective symptoms. HuckleB Mar 2015 #4
of for fuck's sake, do you understand that asthma attacks kill people? Warren Stupidity Mar 2015 #29
Yes, they should. Homeopathy is junk. NuclearDem Mar 2015 #6
An emphatic YES etherealtruth Mar 2015 #7
I'd say that any claim or statement that a product is a treatment for petronius Mar 2015 #8
This Dorian Gray Mar 2015 #22
The Internet is starting to cause that to break down. jeff47 Mar 2015 #39
So then the pharmaceutical companies should have to prove their products are 100% safe! without Dont call me Shirley Apr 2015 #63
Why does that follow? Marr Apr 2015 #68
Hell yes! n/t PasadenaTrudy Mar 2015 #9
Yes. LuvNewcastle Mar 2015 #10
Only if they cause an oily discharge n/t Oilwellian Mar 2015 #11
Just leave the metaphysical healers alone ripcord Mar 2015 #14
I think anything that's sold as medicine should be regulated like medicine bhikkhu Mar 2015 #15
The FDA busted General Mills for claiming Cheerios can reduce cholesterol NickB79 Mar 2015 #16
+1,000,000 ... 000 HuckleB Mar 2015 #17
Yes. There is nothing in them. Thor_MN Mar 2015 #19
Yes, Homepath remmedies should require actual research to show they work. Agnosticsherbet Mar 2015 #26
The FDA should hold them down and burn them with a crack pipe. Quantess Mar 2015 #31
Yes. Homeopathy is proven quackery. backscatter712 Mar 2015 #37
The laws against fraud should apply. Kalidurga Mar 2015 #38
Nope. GliderGuider Mar 2015 #40
You have to be joking. HuckleB Mar 2015 #50
Nope. GliderGuider Mar 2015 #52
Duh. HuckleB Mar 2015 #60
The FDA monitors use of homeopathic products for adverse events. Avalux Mar 2015 #41
It's plenty feasible, but Big Supplement keeps it from happening. HuckleB Mar 2015 #43
No, they are grandfathered, and should be considered gras. nt bananas Mar 2015 #42
They are worthless scams. HuckleB Mar 2015 #49
It should have the same legal ramifications as a pharmacutical company that... Taitertots Mar 2015 #44
Well, that would include most supplements. HuckleB Mar 2015 #48
To my knowledge most supplements don't say they can cure specific illnesses Taitertots Mar 2015 #53
So you haven't been to a supplement seller's store or web page. HuckleB Mar 2015 #61
How many deaths have resulted from treatment foregone due to the use of homeopathics? GliderGuider Mar 2015 #45
So worthless scams are ok with you. HuckleB Mar 2015 #47
Did I say medicine was bad? GliderGuider Mar 2015 #51
Funny you're asking for evidence now. phil89 Mar 2015 #56
People have a right to try and sell whatever they want that's not illegal. GliderGuider Mar 2015 #57
You have to be kidding. HuckleB Mar 2015 #58
Thanks for the link. 437 people, eh? That's shocking! GliderGuider Mar 2015 #62
This really isn't different from lying bastard pols who promise to help you valerief Mar 2015 #55
Half a century on now... hunter Apr 2015 #66
The first question to ask is are they dangerous to society? Rex Apr 2015 #67
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Should the FDA crack down...»Reply #66