Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Faryn Balyncd

(5,125 posts)
Wed Apr 1, 2015, 07:22 PM Apr 2015

Washington Post: "TPP will help neither workers nor consumers" [View all]







Trans-Pacific Partnership treaty will help neither workers nor consumers



By Katrina vanden Heuvel, in The Washington Post





. . . With tariffs already low, current trade treaties are focused less on tariffs and trade than on “harmonizing regulations” for investors. But these regulations concern worker rights, consumer and environmental protections, economic policies that are the expression of our democracy. Too often, “harmonization” is simply an excuse for corporations to institute a race to the bottom. . . . . . .U.S. negotiators forcefully demand other countries pay a price for greater access to the U.S. market. But that price generally involves one or another corporate lobby, not the interests of the American people. So our drug companies get protections against the introduction of generic drugs, driving up prices abroad. Our agribusiness gets protection for its genetically altered foodstuffs. Wall Street gets rules making the sale of arcane derivatives easier.

The TPP is a classic expression of the way the rules are fixed to benefit the few and not the many. It has been negotiated in secret, but 500 corporations and banks sit on advisory committees with access to various chapters. The lead negotiator, Michael Froman, was a protege of former Treasury secretary Robert Rubin, and followed him from Treasury to Citibank, the bank whose excesses helped blow up the economy before it had to be bailed out. Although corporations are wired in, the American people are locked out of the TPP negotiations. And, as Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) said, “Members of Congress and their staff have an easier time accessing national security documents than proposed trade deals, but if I were negotiating this deal I suppose I wouldn’t want people to see it either.”

The brutal negotiations of the TPP haven’t been about tariffs but about protections and regulations. Last week, the draft chapter concerning the “Investor-State Dispute Settlement” mechanism was leaked to Wikileaks and the New York Times. Essentially, the chapter allows a company to sue for taxpayer damages if a government (federal, state or local) passes laws or take actions that the company alleges will impinge on future expected profits. The “tribunal” is a panel of lawyers, drawn from a small group of accredited international lawyers who serve both as judges and advocates. If successful the companies can collect millions in damages from governments. The provisions are so shocking that the TPP mandates that the chapter not be declassified until four years after the TPP goes into force or fails to pass. . . . . The administration says we shouldn’t worry about this, because the United States has never lost a case and that the dispute mechanism is basically designed to be used on countries with weak or corrupted legal systems. But as Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) has noted, Philip Morris has already sued Uruguay because of its new anti-smoking regulations that have been lauded globally. A French company sued Egypt for raising the minimum wage; a Swedish company sued Germany for phasing out nuclear power.

How do trade treaties that undermine workers, cost jobs and create a private, corporate global arbitration system get through Congress? The answer, of course, is the corporate lobby that writes the rules mobilizes big money and armies of lobbyists to drive them through. Most Democrats oppose the treaties, but the Wall Street wing of the party tends to support them. Conservatives would naturally oppose secretive global panels that can force taxpayers to pay damages to companies, but the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Business Roundtable round up votes to get the treaty passed. . . . . So remember, when the president argues that it is vital that “we” write the rules, “we” means not the American people, but corporate and financial interests. . . . . President Obama has dramatically called inequality the defining challenge of our time. But the reason the 1 percent capture virtually all of the income growth in this society, the reason working families are struggling simply to stay afloat, is that the rules are rigged by the powerful to favor themselves. Our trade policies are clear examples of that. America’s middle class will continue to sink until “we” means the American people, not Wall Street and the corporate lobby. . . . .



http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/trans-pacific-partnership-treaty-will-help-neither-workers-nor-consumers/2015/03/31/145e98ba-d727-11e4-ba28-f2a685dc7f89_story.html



















59 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Be ready to get attacked based on the source. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Apr 2015 #1
Except in THIS case, the author is Editor & Publisher of The Nation 99th_Monkey Apr 2015 #4
Probably so, Fuddnik Apr 2015 #7
Why do you say her credentials are impeccable? ND-Dem Apr 2015 #23
That depends on whether the article is favorable or unfavorable to topics like the TPP, sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #27
K&R! marym625 Apr 2015 #2
K&R bvar22 Apr 2015 #3
K&R nt 99th_Monkey Apr 2015 #5
A French company sued Egypt for raising the minimum wage; a Swedish company sued Germany for phasing djean111 Apr 2015 #6
K/R Jack Rabbit Apr 2015 #8
If the TPP had been in affect during FDR's fasttense Apr 2015 #9
Holy Gini Coefficient Batman! vanden Heuevel got a piece in the Bezos Gazette? Fumesucker Apr 2015 #10
Yes. So never mind the content 99th_Monkey Apr 2015 #11
so where are the Third Wayers? nt antigop Apr 2015 #12
Likely trying to dig up dirt on Katrina vanden Heuvel /nt Dragonfli Apr 2015 #13
conspicuously absent. nt antigop Apr 2015 #14
Waiting for the email from The Heritage Foundation with the latest talking points? (nm) Elwood P Dowd Apr 2015 #16
They've been slow to respond today. The Arctic Drilling will take a while to 'explain' sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #28
K/R x100 840high Apr 2015 #15
K & R Thespian2 Apr 2015 #17
K&FuckinR. nt Guy Whitey Corngood Apr 2015 #18
"The provisions are so shocking that the TPP mandates that the chapter not be declassified until..." salib Apr 2015 #19
To be fair, it's the negotiating document that is supposed to he classified, but obviously isn't. Hoyt Apr 2015 #29
Or so you keep saying, repeat a lie enough times and it becomes true to those listening Dragonfli Apr 2015 #51
Thems the facts. Look it up yourself, quit relying on people trying to boost member/readership. Hoyt Apr 2015 #55
Good! Repeated again, keep up the excellent work /nt Dragonfli Apr 2015 #56
Hillary's Business Legacy at State Dept (leading part in drafting TPP) antigop Apr 2015 #20
Kicking a million times. (WIsh I could.) JDPriestly Apr 2015 #21
Just as we've been saying all along Oilwellian Apr 2015 #22
Many of us do. Too bad for us. merrily Apr 2015 #45
The Third Wayers Art_from_Ark Apr 2015 #48
It's geopolitical. joshcryer Apr 2015 #24
LOL! merrily Apr 2015 #32
Oh, my late night mockery commences. joshcryer Apr 2015 #33
You seem to want it be ongoing, or you would not have replied. merrily Apr 2015 #34
This is not your OP. joshcryer Apr 2015 #36
Thanks for proving my point, yet again. merrily Apr 2015 #37
Since when was "LOL!" a legit response? joshcryer Apr 2015 #38
It appears very simple to me, Merrily merely finds you amusing Dragonfli Apr 2015 #52
merrily admits literally to continual mockery. joshcryer Apr 2015 #39
What a delicate flower you must be, do you have any idea how rediculous you sound to actual victims Dragonfli Apr 2015 #53
Where did I say that? joshcryer Apr 2015 #59
"...on what anyone informed on the matter already knows" Erich Bloodaxe BSN Apr 2015 #40
Not really. joshcryer Apr 2015 #41
If that was the case, it wouldn't exist. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Apr 2015 #42
Few US politicians want to talk about basic income. joshcryer Apr 2015 #43
+1 an entire shit load. Enthusiast Apr 2015 #44
Why would it? It's not designed to help either group. hughee99 Apr 2015 #25
Of course not. That's why we elect Democratic politicians. Oh, wait..... merrily Apr 2015 #31
It will be wonderful for Clinton Foundation donors Man from Pickens Apr 2015 #26
"TPP will help neither workers nor consumers" merrily Apr 2015 #30
Some people here try to claim that that is not the case Art_from_Ark Apr 2015 #35
Thing is, it will be ratified. Republicans certainly aren't going to oppose it. merrily Apr 2015 #46
The TPP (and TTIP) is the equivalent of ALEC writing the laws for the whole world, not just djean111 Apr 2015 #47
And yet... 99Forever Apr 2015 #49
Kick! Autumn Apr 2015 #50
K and R! hifiguy Apr 2015 #54
The Biggest Bitter Pill/Back Stab From Obama colsohlibgal Apr 2015 #57
K & R !!! WillyT Apr 2015 #58
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Washington Post: "TP...