Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Washington Post: "TPP will help neither workers nor consumers" [View all]
Trans-Pacific Partnership treaty will help neither workers nor consumers
By Katrina vanden Heuvel, in The Washington Post

. . . With tariffs already low, current trade treaties are focused less on tariffs and trade than on harmonizing regulations for investors. But these regulations concern worker rights, consumer and environmental protections, economic policies that are the expression of our democracy. Too often, harmonization is simply an excuse for corporations to institute a race to the bottom. . . . . . .U.S. negotiators forcefully demand other countries pay a price for greater access to the U.S. market. But that price generally involves one or another corporate lobby, not the interests of the American people. So our drug companies get protections against the introduction of generic drugs, driving up prices abroad. Our agribusiness gets protection for its genetically altered foodstuffs. Wall Street gets rules making the sale of arcane derivatives easier.
The TPP is a classic expression of the way the rules are fixed to benefit the few and not the many. It has been negotiated in secret, but 500 corporations and banks sit on advisory committees with access to various chapters. The lead negotiator, Michael Froman, was a protege of former Treasury secretary Robert Rubin, and followed him from Treasury to Citibank, the bank whose excesses helped blow up the economy before it had to be bailed out. Although corporations are wired in, the American people are locked out of the TPP negotiations. And, as Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) said, Members of Congress and their staff have an easier time accessing national security documents than proposed trade deals, but if I were negotiating this deal I suppose I wouldnt want people to see it either.
The brutal negotiations of the TPP havent been about tariffs but about protections and regulations. Last week, the draft chapter concerning the Investor-State Dispute Settlement mechanism was leaked to Wikileaks and the New York Times. Essentially, the chapter allows a company to sue for taxpayer damages if a government (federal, state or local) passes laws or take actions that the company alleges will impinge on future expected profits. The tribunal is a panel of lawyers, drawn from a small group of accredited international lawyers who serve both as judges and advocates. If successful the companies can collect millions in damages from governments. The provisions are so shocking that the TPP mandates that the chapter not be declassified until four years after the TPP goes into force or fails to pass. . . . . The administration says we shouldnt worry about this, because the United States has never lost a case and that the dispute mechanism is basically designed to be used on countries with weak or corrupted legal systems. But as Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) has noted, Philip Morris has already sued Uruguay because of its new anti-smoking regulations that have been lauded globally. A French company sued Egypt for raising the minimum wage; a Swedish company sued Germany for phasing out nuclear power.
How do trade treaties that undermine workers, cost jobs and create a private, corporate global arbitration system get through Congress? The answer, of course, is the corporate lobby that writes the rules mobilizes big money and armies of lobbyists to drive them through. Most Democrats oppose the treaties, but the Wall Street wing of the party tends to support them. Conservatives would naturally oppose secretive global panels that can force taxpayers to pay damages to companies, but the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Business Roundtable round up votes to get the treaty passed. . . . . So remember, when the president argues that it is vital that we write the rules, we means not the American people, but corporate and financial interests. . . . . President Obama has dramatically called inequality the defining challenge of our time. But the reason the 1 percent capture virtually all of the income growth in this society, the reason working families are struggling simply to stay afloat, is that the rules are rigged by the powerful to favor themselves. Our trade policies are clear examples of that. Americas middle class will continue to sink until we means the American people, not Wall Street and the corporate lobby. . . . .
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/trans-pacific-partnership-treaty-will-help-neither-workers-nor-consumers/2015/03/31/145e98ba-d727-11e4-ba28-f2a685dc7f89_story.html
59 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
That depends on whether the article is favorable or unfavorable to topics like the TPP,
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#27
A French company sued Egypt for raising the minimum wage; a Swedish company sued Germany for phasing
djean111
Apr 2015
#6
Holy Gini Coefficient Batman! vanden Heuevel got a piece in the Bezos Gazette?
Fumesucker
Apr 2015
#10
Waiting for the email from The Heritage Foundation with the latest talking points? (nm)
Elwood P Dowd
Apr 2015
#16
They've been slow to respond today. The Arctic Drilling will take a while to 'explain'
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#28
"The provisions are so shocking that the TPP mandates that the chapter not be declassified until..."
salib
Apr 2015
#19
To be fair, it's the negotiating document that is supposed to he classified, but obviously isn't.
Hoyt
Apr 2015
#29
Or so you keep saying, repeat a lie enough times and it becomes true to those listening
Dragonfli
Apr 2015
#51
Thems the facts. Look it up yourself, quit relying on people trying to boost member/readership.
Hoyt
Apr 2015
#55
What a delicate flower you must be, do you have any idea how rediculous you sound to actual victims
Dragonfli
Apr 2015
#53
Thing is, it will be ratified. Republicans certainly aren't going to oppose it.
merrily
Apr 2015
#46