Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Can the Iranian deal be done even if the rethugs, won't go for it? I really hope so, because both [View all]kelly1mm
(5,756 posts)33. The US can and does have unilateral sanctions against countries without UN approval. See Cuba. nt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Can the Iranian deal be done even if the rethugs, won't go for it? I really hope so, because both [View all]
still_one
Apr 2015
OP
Your fears are valid. I will be looking for an answer as to your question.
misterhighwasted
Apr 2015
#1
I really hope it can be, and I also hope the MSM will not give free reign to republican propaganda
still_one
Apr 2015
#5
An Executive Angreement also can be modified/terminated at will by any successor President. nt
kelly1mm
Apr 2015
#4
From my understanding, the President can enter into executive agreements with other nations
kelly1mm
Apr 2015
#3
That spells it out. I only hope that Collins and a few other republicans will put country before
still_one
Apr 2015
#7
I do not think a successor can simply opt out of this once it becomes International Law. It would be
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#11
That is the theory that the President is going to try and use. However, the US has no problem
kelly1mm
Apr 2015
#19
The US can and does have unilateral sanctions against countries without UN approval. See Cuba. nt
kelly1mm
Apr 2015
#33
The US GDP is 16% of the global total, so much more important economically than our popultion
kelly1mm
Apr 2015
#37
good, though the rethugs, could isolate us from the rest of the world if God forbid they win the WH
still_one
Apr 2015
#13
Yes, because this is an International Agreement, involving five other nations. Congress has no
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#10
As pointed out, they can undo the U.S. participation in it, after President Obama's term by the next
still_one
Apr 2015
#12
It doesn't matter who is in the WH, this will be almost written in stone, unless Iran violates
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#15
As Cotton pointed out, "Tehran, the capital of Iran, might be controlled by anyone other than Iran".
still_one
Apr 2015
#21
They have no credibility. And as I said, even if they succeeded in pressuring the Western nations
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#23
They will have to get past five powerful nations, AND Iran to try to undo this.
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#24
The US can and does have unilateral sanctions against countries without UN approval. See Cuba. nt
kelly1mm
Apr 2015
#34
TeaParTY people are dumb, immature, children. That they have some power here is absolutely
NoJusticeNoPeace
Apr 2015
#26
Republicans know their grandchildren will be going to Barack Obama High School
Renew Deal
Apr 2015
#40