Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Can the Iranian deal be done even if the rethugs, won't go for it? I really hope so, because both [View all]Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)39. I think that Republicans hope to deny Obama a big win in his legacy.
This is as big as Nixon's Visit to China and its recognition. Like the ACA, it will be a part of Obama's legacy. Because there are six other nations tha are very close allies, the next president can not just withdraw wtihout pianful repricussions to our international clout.
It also is a monumental loss for Republicans in Congress who have gone historic lenghts to stop it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Can the Iranian deal be done even if the rethugs, won't go for it? I really hope so, because both [View all]
still_one
Apr 2015
OP
Your fears are valid. I will be looking for an answer as to your question.
misterhighwasted
Apr 2015
#1
I really hope it can be, and I also hope the MSM will not give free reign to republican propaganda
still_one
Apr 2015
#5
An Executive Angreement also can be modified/terminated at will by any successor President. nt
kelly1mm
Apr 2015
#4
From my understanding, the President can enter into executive agreements with other nations
kelly1mm
Apr 2015
#3
That spells it out. I only hope that Collins and a few other republicans will put country before
still_one
Apr 2015
#7
I do not think a successor can simply opt out of this once it becomes International Law. It would be
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#11
That is the theory that the President is going to try and use. However, the US has no problem
kelly1mm
Apr 2015
#19
The US can and does have unilateral sanctions against countries without UN approval. See Cuba. nt
kelly1mm
Apr 2015
#33
The US GDP is 16% of the global total, so much more important economically than our popultion
kelly1mm
Apr 2015
#37
good, though the rethugs, could isolate us from the rest of the world if God forbid they win the WH
still_one
Apr 2015
#13
Yes, because this is an International Agreement, involving five other nations. Congress has no
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#10
As pointed out, they can undo the U.S. participation in it, after President Obama's term by the next
still_one
Apr 2015
#12
It doesn't matter who is in the WH, this will be almost written in stone, unless Iran violates
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#15
As Cotton pointed out, "Tehran, the capital of Iran, might be controlled by anyone other than Iran".
still_one
Apr 2015
#21
They have no credibility. And as I said, even if they succeeded in pressuring the Western nations
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#23
They will have to get past five powerful nations, AND Iran to try to undo this.
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#24
The US can and does have unilateral sanctions against countries without UN approval. See Cuba. nt
kelly1mm
Apr 2015
#34
TeaParTY people are dumb, immature, children. That they have some power here is absolutely
NoJusticeNoPeace
Apr 2015
#26
Republicans know their grandchildren will be going to Barack Obama High School
Renew Deal
Apr 2015
#40