Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Aerows

(39,961 posts)

25. For someone that is trying to be vague

Reply to geek tragedy (Reply #18)

Fri Apr 3, 2015, 04:07 PM

Apr 2015

but has presented vociferous opposition to the deal but won't elucidate why, while pretending otherwise in this thread, it's kind of interesting, these posts.

If Dreamer Tatum would discuss this honestly and state the objections he or she has, then we can have a real dialogue instead of this foggy, disgruntled and plainly unsettled conversation he or she seems to be having with everyone that is applauding this development.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

36 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Losers. [View all] geek tragedy Apr 2015 OP

May they keep losing and losing. villager Apr 2015 #1

PLUS ONE, a huge bunch! Enthusiast Apr 2015 #36

I would add weapons merchants in general. kairos12 Apr 2015 #2

Except that Iran's gains will touch off, oh, an arms race in the ME. nt Dreamer Tatum Apr 2015 #6

as opposed to the war that the people who oppose the negotaitions favor nt geek tragedy Apr 2015 #9

Somehow I missed the inevitability of war with Iran. In my world, Obama is President Dreamer Tatum Apr 2015 #11

Obama has said the alternative to his is the path towards war geek tragedy Apr 2015 #13

Whoa there. Iran said it didn't HAVE a nuclear program. It was for power generation. Dreamer Tatum Apr 2015 #14

nice dodge. geek tragedy Apr 2015 #16

Dodge? We were told their "research" was for peaceful nuclear power. Dreamer Tatum Apr 2015 #17

very telling that you have to resort to attacking strawmen in order geek tragedy Apr 2015 #18

Netanyahu is in power in Israel. Cheney is retired. Dreamer Tatum Apr 2015 #19

Not really Aerows Apr 2015 #24

If Iran lives up to the deal as outlined so far, then it's a good deal. Dreamer Tatum Apr 2015 #26

I'm puzzled. Aerows Apr 2015 #28

For someone that is trying to be vague Aerows Apr 2015 #25

They'll be fine. There's always someone needing killin'. [nt] Jester Messiah Apr 2015 #34

If Saudi starts babbling on about the 6 Nation, UN and World sanctioned Deal....stop refuelling their fighter jets. Fred Sanders Apr 2015 #3

it's interesting, there seems to be tacit alliance developing geek tragedy Apr 2015 #4

... napkinz Apr 2015 #5

Mogherini has been a real improvement. nt bemildred Apr 2015 #7

only woman amongst the major figures there, correct? nt geek tragedy Apr 2015 #8

She stands out. bemildred Apr 2015 #12

I see one other woman in this onem is that LaGarde? bemildred Apr 2015 #20

looks like her, she would be there for sanctions mechanics, right? nt geek tragedy Apr 2015 #22

Yep. nt bemildred Apr 2015 #23

If they talk like losers and act like losers...they are losers. randome Apr 2015 #10

kick nt arely staircase Apr 2015 #15

So long losers, the boogeyman bullshit that Iran was the next great Satan has been squashed. Jefferson23 Apr 2015 #21

We shouldn't count our chickens before they hatch. JDPriestly Apr 2015 #27

Meanwhile, that idiot Netanyahu Warpy Apr 2015 #29

don't trust Iran but..... PatrynXX Apr 2015 #30

Saudi Arabia and Iran CanonRay Apr 2015 #31

The House of Saud is a big winner. former9thward Apr 2015 #32

I look forward to the day when we need not identify "the woman" in the lineup by her red libdem4life Apr 2015 #33

I agree with that.. "My favorite set of losers since Romney and Ryan." Cha Apr 2015 #35