Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
12. Actually, I do care about the whole story.
Fri May 4, 2012, 06:09 PM
May 2012

But I am also smart enough to separate individual data points, and trends.

Let me explain it this way.

When I was laid off a few years back. That hurt me and my family. And, it contributed a data point to a larger graph of employment trends. When I got a new job, that helped my family, and also contributed a new data point to the trend analysis.

And so ... each data point is its own story. The people you mention are their own story. And a trend line which pulls in many data points is an aggregate, and as such it can never "tell the whole story".

If one can not comprehend the difference between a data point, versus the aggregate of data points that a trend represents, then the country is screwed because in that situation, the only data point that matters is mine.

And I know you are thinking "YES" ... if I am out of work, my data point is the only data point that matters. But what if the people with jobs also take that position ... "only my data point matters". Then we are all screwed long term. Those who have jobs don't worry about those without.

The trends matter regardless of whether your personal data point is currently in the plus or the minus column. And if we forget that, those who happen to be in the "minus" column at a given moment will tend to stay there. Because those in the plus column will only worry about their own data point.

I'd love to see the economy move forward faster. To see it do so, you have to look at trends.

Also ... for the group of people you mention who are about to lose their jobs ... will Obama or Romney be more likely to help get them jobs in the future? Which policies might help them or hurt them?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Suck on it, GOPers. The Velveteen Ocelot May 2012 #1
K & R. n/t FSogol May 2012 #2
Now if we could only recover the missing Living Wage pay that is missing from those recovered jobs. RC May 2012 #3
If its never discussed, how do you know its "missing"? JoePhilly May 2012 #4
I agree with you. We should be happy that we have lots of min wage jobs rhett o rick May 2012 #5
Except I did not say that. JoePhilly May 2012 #7
But of course not. You just ask questions. Harder to pin you down. Oh yes, you also use rhett o rick May 2012 #10
Actually, I do care about the whole story. JoePhilly May 2012 #12
Just because Pres Obama is a better choice doesnt mean we should only look at rhett o rick May 2012 #13
If your friend's house burned to the ground ... they'd end up living somewhere else until it was ... JoePhilly May 2012 #16
My argument isnt with the accuracy of the graph. And of course Obama is the only rhett o rick May 2012 #21
I know it is missing because of the lack of mention in stories about "Just Jobs" RC May 2012 #6
Sure ... and we might also ask why ... JoePhilly May 2012 #8
K&R and bookmarked to bash the whiners jpak May 2012 #9
Still serious losses of governmental jobs and teaching jobs JPZenger May 2012 #11
Um... that's 4.4 million short. cthulu2016 May 2012 #14
Actually, ProSense May 2012 #15
Oh, FFS cthulu2016 May 2012 #18
Wow, ProSense May 2012 #19
Wow. I thought employment was dead. DevonRex May 2012 #17
Yup, now it's time to dig into the Bush losses. FarLeftFist May 2012 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»CHART: Economy Has Recove...»Reply #12