Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
232. Oberliner: Yes, Khomeini is a menace to his own people and others. I hope is this will usher in an
Sat Apr 4, 2015, 04:39 AM
Apr 2015
Iran that is more secular and less zealous. The fanaticism has done nothing but oppress their own people and compound tensions in the area.

Their fears are NOT unfounded. No one can ignore a neighbor who calls for one's death. Americans know what can happen.


Israel is not the only target of the religious extremists or demagogues of Iran, the Ayatollahs have blood on their hands since they took over. Much of that blood is Iranian.

Some of it is on our hands.

The terms of the framework Obama and others set on Iran are the harshest ever set for any nation. Anything that goes wrong, the agreement says, Iran will 'be default' be judged and then sanctioned - many even military action will be taken:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/110228400

Sorry for the swipe at Netanyahu if you supported him. I don't live there. But TOD and TPV have an analysis of the agreement and as Obama details it in the video at the link, it's harsh. He has also said precisely what I believe you are trying to convey here, that we don't trust Iran for precisely the reasons you give. I'm sure many who voted for Netanyaho voted for him out of a sense of self-defense and not hatred of Palestinians.

I hope that secularists in Israel will take some heart in that and not fall for those who would terrify them if there truly is a way out of the morass they have been for so long. This kind of rhetoric is a demonization of many peoples just before a strike is made.

Not all hearts in those nations agree with the extremists in either:



I've seen other videos of Israelis and Palestinians trying the one on one approach, main;y by those who have lost their family members to terror and bombings, etc. to get peace in the region. I guess they are in the ranks of the Israeli left.

Of course the MIC media that infects virtually every nation doesn't give their views air time. Instead, the propagandists monopolize media with fear and hatred. And I'm not even talking about the people who live in the war zones.

AFAIK, Israel has been in a constant state of war from agreements ending, made twenty years before as the Ottoman Empire collapsed, but Jews had been returning since 1881, but really, they sought to return since they were run out by the Romans:

Zionism and the British mandate

The first wave of modern Jewish migration to Ottoman-ruled Palestine, known as the First Aliyah, began in 1881, as Jews fled pogroms in Eastern Europe.[100] Although the Zionist movement already existed in practice, Austro-Hungarian journalist Theodor Herzl is credited with founding political Zionism,[101] a movement which sought to establish a Jewish state in the Land of Israel, by elevating the Jewish Question to the international plane.[102] In 1896, Herzl published Der Judenstaat (The State of the Jews), offering his vision of a future Jewish state; the following year he presided over the first World Zionist Congress.[103]

The Second Aliyah (1904–14), began after the Kishinev pogrom; some 40,000 Jews settled in Palestine, although nearly half of them left eventually.[100] Both the first and second waves of migrants were mainly Orthodox Jews,[104] although the Second Aliyah included socialist groups who established the kibbutz movement.[105] During World War I, British Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour sent the Balfour Declaration of 1917 to Baron Rothschild (Walter Rothschild, 2nd Baron Rothschild), a leader of the British Jewish community, that stated that Britain intended for the creation of a Jewish homeland within the Palestinian Mandate.[106][107]

The Jewish Legion, a group primarily of Zionist volunteers, assisted, in 1918, in the British conquest of Palestine.[108] Arab opposition to British rule and Jewish immigration led to the 1920 Palestine riots and the formation of a Jewish militia known as the Haganah (meaning "The Defense" in Hebrew), from which the Irgun and Lehi, or Stern Gang, paramilitary groups later split off.[109] In 1922, the League of Nations granted Britain a mandate over Palestine under terms similar to the Balfour Declaration.[110] The population of the area at this time was predominantly Arab and Muslim, with Jews accounting for about 11%,[111] Christians 9.5%.[112]

The Third (1919–23) and Fourth Aliyahs (1924–29) brought an additional 100,000 Jews to Palestine.[100]

Finally, the rise of Nazism and the increasing persecution of Jews in the 1930s led to the Fifth Aliyah, with an influx of a quarter of a million Jews. This was a major cause of the Arab revolt of 1936–39 in which the British killed 5,032 Arabs and wounded 14,760,[113] and resulting in over ten percent of the adult male Palestinian Arab population killed, wounded, imprisoned or exiled.[114] The British introduced restrictions on Jewish immigration to Palestine with the White Paper of 1939. With countries around the world turning away Jewish refugees fleeing the Holocaust, a clandestine movement known as Aliyah Bet was organized to bring Jews to Palestine.[100] By the end of World War II, the Jewish population of Palestine had increased to 33% of the total population.


Israeli Independence:

In 1947, the British government announced it would withdraw from Mandatory Palestine, stating it was unable to arrive at a solution acceptable to both Arabs and Jews.

On 15 May 1947, the General Assembly of the newly formed United Nations resolved that a committee, United Nations Special Committee on Palestine (UNSCOP), be created "to prepare for consideration at the next regular session of the Assembly a report on the question of Palestine".[118] In the Report of the Committee dated 3 September 1947 to the UN General Assembly,[119] the majority of the Committee in Chapter VI proposed a plan to replace the British Mandate with "an independent Arab State, an independent Jewish State, and the City of Jerusalem ... the last to be under an International Trusteeship System".[120] On 29 November 1947, the General Assembly adopted a resolution recommending the adoption and implementation of the Plan of Partition with Economic Union as Resolution 181 (II).[121] The Plan attached to the resolution was essentially that proposed by the majority of the Committee in the Report of 3 September 1947.

The Jewish Agency, which was the recognized representative of the Jewish community, accepted the plan. The Arab League and Arab Higher Committee of Palestine rejected it, and indicated that they would reject any other plan of partition.

On the following day, the 1 December 1947, the Arab Higher Committee proclaimed a three-day strike, and Arab bands began attacking Jewish targets.[124] The Jews were initially on the defensive as civil war broke out, but gradually moved onto the offensive.[125] The Palestinian Arab economy collapsed and 250,000 Palestinian Arabs fled or were expelled.[126]

On 14 May 1948, the day before the expiration of the British Mandate, David Ben-Gurion, the head of the Jewish Agency, declared "the establishment of a Jewish state in Eretz-Israel, to be known as the State of Israel".[127][128] The only reference in the text of the Declaration to the borders of the new state is the use of the term, Eretz-Israel...[129]

The following day, the armies of four Arab countries—Egypt, Syria, Transjordan and Iraq—entered what had been British Mandatory Palestine, launching the 1948 Arab–Israeli War;[131][132] Contingents from Yemen, Morocco, Saudi Arabia and Sudan joined the war.[133][134] The apparent purpose of the invasion was to prevent the establishment of the Jewish state at inception, and some Arab leaders talked about driving the Jews into the sea.[135][136][137] According to Benny Morris, Jews felt that the invading Arab armies aimed to slaughter the Jews.[138] The Arab league stated that the invasion was to restore law and order and to prevent further bloodshed.[139]

After a year of fighting, a ceasefire was declared and temporary borders, known as the Green Line, were established.[140] Jordan annexed what became known as the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and Egypt took control of the Gaza Strip. The United Nations estimated that more than 700,000 Palestinians were expelled by or fled from advancing Israeli forces during the conflict—what would became known in Arabic as the Nakba ("catastrophe&quot ...[141]


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel

Of course, none of this is news to you, I'm just posting it for reference. Researching this from a secular view, I came to the conclusion that the creation of Israel as it now exists was not just imperialism on the side of the British, but what happened as great empires rise and fall. I'm not sure of the adjective great in application to any empire, but it's rather foolish to deny the centuries of caliphates which were empires in the area.

I suspect Israelis live and breathe the reality of empires that once existed there, and those trying to restore themselves such as the Daesh are doing now. Jews are a minority in that part of the world. When I say they have been a constant state of war, it is not as slander on either side. But a statement of fact. They have never really been accepted, just a look at the Wikipedia entries, which are most likely the weakest as they can be edited, show everything is disputed.

There is fear on all sides and unjust ideologies and religious extremism at work in the region. And Iran's wild statements - which I will emphasize again are from religious RWNJs that drone on constantly and hopefully not held by thinking people in general - give a distorted view. IMO.

Israel has adopted, rightly or wrongly, a fortress mentality because of this. And Netanyahu was reelected from the fears of Israelis combined with horrific experiences, both there and elsewhere. The pain keeps building.

I really want this deal to suceed, and I believe that it will help to liberalize Iranian thinking. It will not be all that pleasant as the voices of hate are very strong and well-practiced.

Thanks for posting this thread. I don't have time to read the other posts, these are merely my thoughts to you, oberliner. I wish the people of the region wisdom to find a better path.

You do realize there was another not clipped statement...NOT a year ago, just 2 weeks ago..here ya go: Fred Sanders Apr 2015 #1
What is your plan to keep Iran from getting nuclear weapons, has Israel ever thought about Thinkingabout Apr 2015 #2
Israel should just be moved. There, problem solved. InAbLuEsTaTe Apr 2015 #253
Let's see how successful you are in accomplishing this. Another reason to see the details Thinkingabout Apr 2015 #275
Yes, as the saying goes..."The devil is in the details." InAbLuEsTaTe Apr 2015 #276
The prospect of getting nuked back isn't a deterrent for Iran? gratuitous Apr 2015 #3
Of course it is. Warren Stupidity Apr 2015 #65
+1 very astute.. n/t jaysunb Apr 2015 #203
Asinine Comments by Leaders... n2doc Apr 2015 #247
Kewl story bro! Rex Apr 2015 #4
... awoke_in_2003 Apr 2015 #200
Hey Rex.. Cha Apr 2015 #222
LOL! Rex Apr 2015 #223
LOL.. Yeah, they're real Grumpy and calling out the President for being ..wait for it.. the horrors Cha Apr 2015 #226
Oh but the parties are the same doncha know!? Rex Apr 2015 #228
"Bomb Bomb Bomb, Bomb Bomb Iran" that is a direct quote from John McCain. JaneyVee Apr 2015 #238
Tough shit, Nutenyahu can take a hike dissentient Apr 2015 #5
Just stupid flase flag shit. Take it elesewhere. HERVEPA Apr 2015 #106
Too fucking bad Capt. Obvious Apr 2015 #6
+1000! Puglover Apr 2015 #239
When the Israelis come up with an alernative other than WAR WAR WAR then I will have geek tragedy Apr 2015 #7
Sorry, but night is now day and water is now dry. Dreamer Tatum Apr 2015 #8
No, the Iranian government is not trustworthy. Which is why the deal calls for intrusive geek tragedy Apr 2015 #10
Funny - we were assured for years that Iran had a Kumbaya Program, not a nuclear one. Dreamer Tatum Apr 2015 #17
Bibi wants the US to go to war with Iran, just like he pushed for us to invade geek tragedy Apr 2015 #27
Tehran's goal is the annihilation of Israel. Dreamer Tatum Apr 2015 #31
So will I. I stand 840high Apr 2015 #205
Like my goal is to date Robert Redford eridani Apr 2015 #207
And Israels goal is the annihilation of the Palestinian people AgingAmerican Apr 2015 #255
This is total BS oberliner Apr 2015 #34
He didn't? bravenak Apr 2015 #45
These are sad attempts that only backfire, which is funny to watch. Rex Apr 2015 #48
It's like the op forgot we have google. bravenak Apr 2015 #53
LOL! Rex Apr 2015 #57
Okay.. just showing off here.. I did the OP's Google Search for him.. Cha Apr 2015 #227
Thanks for doing their homework for them! Rex Apr 2015 #229
No problem.. I said it was "a time waster.." to the OP.. but actually it was worth it to me Cha Apr 2015 #231
Israel warned us against Iraq invasion, US official says Mosby Apr 2015 #254
The hasbara crowd rivals only the Kremlin trolls in their denial of the obvious nt geek tragedy Apr 2015 #51
I'm always shocked when they totally re-write history. bravenak Apr 2015 #59
And they believe that hasbara means something pure. R. Daneel Olivaw Apr 2015 #242
No -- Dick Cheney lied us into war Yupster Apr 2015 #215
Bibi was GLAD to assist him. More than happy. bravenak Apr 2015 #216
Hey, Aloha bravenak.. I did the OP's Google search for him. Thought I would share it.. Cha Apr 2015 #225
Thank you. Sorry you had to do his work for him. bravenak Apr 2015 #260
It was just so the opposite of true..I had to. Cha Apr 2015 #290
'If you take out Saddam, Saddam’s regime, I guarantee you that it will have enormous positive geek tragedy Apr 2015 #49
Oh I get it now! We are ONLY supposed to diss the RWing leaders in ONE country Rex Apr 2015 #55
One is allowed to criticize other rightwing leaders as long as one geek tragedy Apr 2015 #99
Oh that is a good point! Rex Apr 2015 #102
Poor peace-loving George W Bush oberliner Apr 2015 #58
Is that your way of admitting that you were completely wrong? geek tragedy Apr 2015 #62
You have literally not a clue what you are talking about oberliner Apr 2015 #68
I said he pushed for us to invade. Which is undeniably true. geek tragedy Apr 2015 #72
And a lot of Israeli military and government people were saying the exact opposite Mosby Apr 2015 #256
Manipulated by Bibi, anyhow. Not the sharpest tool in the shed in the first placd. bravenak Apr 2015 #64
Do you even realize what you just did there? AgingAmerican Apr 2015 #261
Really? 2naSalit Apr 2015 #93
You are partially right as it was Sharon that pushed the Iraqi invasion/debacle. See link below. Purveyor Apr 2015 #155
You are absolutely right on that one. The U.S. invaded Iraq twice without anyones encouragement, still_one Apr 2015 #178
It is NOT BS At All. It's true. what a time waster to google for members of DU.. who get it So Cha Apr 2015 #224
YEP. And the Bibi apologists are sad to watch, but totally predictable. Rex Apr 2015 #43
You do realize in 1953 we overthrew the Democratically elected government in Iran and still_one Apr 2015 #176
Tonnes of blowback. R. Daneel Olivaw Apr 2015 #243
I do wonder how long 840high Apr 2015 #210
Didn't we try that already? Regime change in Iran? calimary Apr 2015 #288
. Rex Apr 2015 #14
LOL Cali_Democrat Apr 2015 #111
I got a nasty PM from a "DUer" in timeout land. Rex Apr 2015 #113
does this poster have the word "left" in their title perchance? nt geek tragedy Apr 2015 #119
OH MY! Rex Apr 2015 #121
well, no, but I was in the thread where they flamed out by bashing Obama with links geek tragedy Apr 2015 #132
Thanks for this post oberliner Apr 2015 #36
who here is ascribing the very best of intentions to Iran's government? nt geek tragedy Apr 2015 #78
No one here has said that the Iranian government is good - as to Netanyahu I take him at his word karynnj Apr 2015 #116
That is because Palestinians are not citizens of Israel Ageless Democrat Apr 2015 #267
But Israel maintains an occupation and control of the borders and waterways of Palestine. bravenak Apr 2015 #274
Except you are wrong. Ageless Democrat Apr 2015 #281
They have settlements all throught the land formerly known as palestine. bravenak Apr 2015 #283
I concur that some settlements are illegal Ageless Democrat Apr 2015 #287
One not so small difference - Who really controls the area they live in? karynnj Apr 2015 #278
West Bank is a legal occupation per UN Ageless Democrat Apr 2015 #285
Building settlements in the legal occupied territories was illegal per the same UN karynnj Apr 2015 #289
I'll trust Israel over Iran anyday. 840high Apr 2015 #211
I don't trust either of them n/t Aerows Apr 2015 #218
How many nukes does Iran have? How many does Israel have? Which one is being inspected? Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2015 #115
Sorry, Dreamer, but your scenario omitted the elephant in the room. truebluegreen Apr 2015 #147
I don't think Iran considers any nation a threat. As for the US being a "threat" to Iran... Dreamer Tatum Apr 2015 #149
Dude. Learn some history. Really. truebluegreen Apr 2015 #154
I can give you a list they regularly threaten to annihilate, but you already know it by heart. nt Dreamer Tatum Apr 2015 #158
"threaten" nt truebluegreen Apr 2015 #162
"Regularly." "Often." "If we did it, I bet you'd shit." nt Dreamer Tatum Apr 2015 #163
Threaten? Iran has fighters RIGHT NOW in Syria, Lebanan, Iraq and Gaza Mosby Apr 2015 #257
"they held Americans hostage for over a year and we did nothing. Some threat" AgingAmerican Apr 2015 #263
This deal actually PREVENTS Iran from developing nuclear weapons. world wide wally Apr 2015 #9
Then why are people calling this a way for Iran to meet Israel's "threat?" nt Dreamer Tatum Apr 2015 #11
In reality, it is because it will improve Iran's economic stature. world wide wally Apr 2015 #15
There are a lot of people walking around claiming that this deal negates Israel's nuclear threat. Dreamer Tatum Apr 2015 #21
Not Israel... Just Netenyahu and his Republican cohorts. world wide wally Apr 2015 #25
Thank you. 840high Apr 2015 #206
Because Israel has been threatening them? AgingAmerican Apr 2015 #266
Who says the Israelis are not? The OP has no idea and seems upset about the deal. Rex Apr 2015 #12
That is what I keep asking myself world wide wally Apr 2015 #18
Not me Rex Apr 2015 #19
You have no idea what you are talking about oberliner Apr 2015 #32
Riiigggghhhttt, you seem very upset that Obama brokered a deal with Iran. Rex Apr 2015 #38
LOL.... haikugal Apr 2015 #221
TY for pointing out the dishonesty of the poster. R. Daneel Olivaw Apr 2015 #248
Personal attacks are lame dude. Mosby Apr 2015 #258
That's not what he did at all. However you are welcome to whatever delusion you choose. Rex Apr 2015 #259
I'm sorry that you can't relate to other posters without engaging in persoanl attacks Mosby Apr 2015 #264
You think it's great just like Bibi never encouraged the US to invade Iraq. nt geek tragedy Apr 2015 #60
Only if Iran sticks to the agreement. 840high Apr 2015 #212
Mossad has also repudiated Netanyahu’s political manipulation of the Iran threat. sinkingfeeling Apr 2015 #13
Hey WARMONGERS, 99Forever Apr 2015 #16
But but but...Iran and peace! Waaahhhh!!! Rex Apr 2015 #22
Agreed Mr Dixon Apr 2015 #24
Not talking about Bibi or his thug friends oberliner Apr 2015 #30
Just carrying the hateful asshole's water, are you? 99Forever Apr 2015 #42
The average Israeli on the street just voted R. Daneel Olivaw Apr 2015 #244
62 million Americans voted for George W Bush and Dick Cheney oberliner Apr 2015 #250
So the average Israeli on the street AgingAmerican Apr 2015 #269
+1000. closeupready Apr 2015 #79
People make too much of blathering rhetoric AgingAmerican Apr 2015 #20
Would YOU be ??!!!nt clarice Apr 2015 #23
I wonder if the deal will limit the "Death to America" chants to just a couple a week. Dreamer Tatum Apr 2015 #26
Keep dreamin Tater. nt clarice Apr 2015 #28
The same proscription that will apply to "Bomb Bomb Bomb Iran" songs geek tragedy Apr 2015 #29
Really? I missed where our government leads those chants on television. Dreamer Tatum Apr 2015 #39
You might want to go back and read what some of the Bush neocons 'chanted' and then put into ACTION sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #50
Your post is either false or fable. Dreamer Tatum Apr 2015 #66
My post is FACT. Are you denying the now infamous threats from neocons like Michael Ledeen? sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #82
Funny the majority of US and Isreali scholars think the deal is a good one. Rex Apr 2015 #95
You seem very bitter that you are not getting your war nt geek tragedy Apr 2015 #54
I'm bitter at realizing the pervasiveness of binary thinking on DU. Dreamer Tatum Apr 2015 #69
No, your schtick is that people who favor negotiations over war must be naive geek tragedy Apr 2015 #76
The facts are on the side of those who don't trust Iran. Dreamer Tatum Apr 2015 #84
The split is not between people who trust the ayatollahs and those who don't. geek tragedy Apr 2015 #87
Funny the majority of US and Isreali scholars think the deal is a good one. Rex Apr 2015 #94
Amazing how they can say (1) this is a bad deal and (2) no of course I don't geek tragedy Apr 2015 #96
IKR!? Rex Apr 2015 #100
Well, I'm not terribly pro-Israel these days, but I do favor the right of everyone geek tragedy Apr 2015 #103
If only that was the goal of the leaders of both countries. nt Rex Apr 2015 #110
I don't trust anyone, actually, but I trust least THOSE WHO TELEVISE DEATH TO AMERICA AND ISRAEL. Dreamer Tatum Apr 2015 #129
I have to question the mental competency of any Democrat... Chan790 Apr 2015 #138
I trust Bibi equally as much as anyone in power in Iran. Dreamer Tatum Apr 2015 #145
Well, Dreamer... Chan790 Apr 2015 #157
Look, I get it. To make the deal the life-altering thing you claim it is... Dreamer Tatum Apr 2015 #159
Exactly Aerows Apr 2015 #220
Bingo! Aerows Apr 2015 #177
... 2naSalit Apr 2015 #135
You offer nothing else. We now have intrusive inspections to make sure they don't get nukes. What neverforget Apr 2015 #219
McCain did that chant on tv. He also said selling Iran cigarettes is ok because it kills them. arcane1 Apr 2015 #134
Please link to McCain leading a throng with specifically that chant. I will wait. Forever. nt Dreamer Tatum Apr 2015 #146
I said McCain did that chant on tv arcane1 Apr 2015 #148
Well, the Iranian leader did, you see. And McCain is a grumpy old bastard with no power. Dreamer Tatum Apr 2015 #150
You're right. McCain was just a senator running for president at the time arcane1 Apr 2015 #152
McCain Chairs the Armed Services Committee AgingAmerican Apr 2015 #268
In a way, yeah it kinda will tkmorris Apr 2015 #46
Yeah, finally wartorn Iran can begin to rebuild. Dreamer Tatum Apr 2015 #52
You are being deliberately obtuse tkmorris Apr 2015 #90
Your posts, as usual, are nonsense. ronnie624 Apr 2015 #107
Quit digging. n/t Comrade Grumpy Apr 2015 #128
Interesting that your historical memory seems to start in 1979... truebluegreen Apr 2015 #153
Well then we ought to be even-stevens by now. Yet they still howl for your death and mine on TV. nt Dreamer Tatum Apr 2015 #156
And hold candlelight vigils in the streets of Tehran after the US was attacked truebluegreen Apr 2015 #161
Part of your demonization of me requires that you assume I disregard the Iranian people. Dreamer Tatum Apr 2015 #165
You must think a lot of yourself. truebluegreen Apr 2015 #217
and we say nothing bad about them, no sir. truebluegreen Apr 2015 #164
Organized chanting, on state TV? No, we don't. Next question. nt Dreamer Tatum Apr 2015 #166
Ah, how soon we forget: KingCharlemagne Apr 2015 #208
I thought that was a national holiday in Iran… not a daily occurrence world wide wally Apr 2015 #168
You want we should go to war for chants?..I think not. whathehell Apr 2015 #233
If Iran wanted ann--- Apr 2015 #33
How could Iran annihilate Israel? DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2015 #44
They can't - that was my point ann--- Apr 2015 #101
Because the Arab coalition would have crumbled once the Israelis were Involved... DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2015 #108
Exactly.. sendero Apr 2015 #175
Some times there are no perfect solutions or even good ones... DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2015 #35
I acknowledge that it might not be just that Israelis wanted to start a war against Iran - 47 GOP leveymg Apr 2015 #37
Maybe those are reactions to the constant threats from ISRAEL to use TACTICAL NUKES sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #40
When did Israel threaten to use tactical nuclear weapons? DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2015 #56
You don't remember that throughout the Bush years? But we don't even have to go back sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #117
The Republicants threatened to use nukes on Iran not the Israelis... DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2015 #123
Wrong, the Israelis threatened to use Tactical Nukes during the Bush years. Of course Republicans sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #140
I'm going to need a citation that the Israelis threatened to use nuclear weapons ... DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2015 #169
"Israel plans nuclear strike on Iran" sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #187
You are conflating threats with plans DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2015 #190
Back pedaling now? You did not believe that Israel threatened AND worse, PLANNED to use tactical sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #195
I never once pointed to Iranian rhetoric in this thread... DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2015 #196
This message was self-deleted by its author sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #185
The 1973 War was the first time Israel used nuclear blackmail against the US. leveymg Apr 2015 #186
Yes but they have never publicly threatened to use nuclear weapons, especially on Iran... DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2015 #188
Israel his issued almost daily threats implying use of nukes against Iran for more than decade. leveymg Apr 2015 #193
Retract what? DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2015 #194
Israel's nuclear "ambiguity" policy is to evade NPT sanctions. It has been very clear about threats leveymg Apr 2015 #251
Thank you! sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #201
+1,000,000 n/t cpwm17 Apr 2015 #197
Tough shit! They also didn't like who we voted for for president last time. bravenak Apr 2015 #41
Of course they don't have a say oberliner Apr 2015 #63
Enough voted for RIGHTWING parties to give him the victory. bravenak Apr 2015 #74
Psst.. Bibi's coalition hasn't been accepted yet Ageless Democrat Apr 2015 #271
Let's hope you are right. He still got the first bite at the apple. bravenak Apr 2015 #272
They Should Embrace It HassleCat Apr 2015 #47
the right wing war mongerers running the Israeli government are not "Israel". Warren Stupidity Apr 2015 #61
I'd be curious to see a poll of Israelis oberliner Apr 2015 #71
I believe there are more right wing Israelis than you think. m-lekktor Apr 2015 #183
I did not quantify that, so I have no idea how you Warren Stupidity Apr 2015 #199
Agreed oberliner Apr 2015 #237
Stalin was our close allie in WWII. Under Stalin about 20 were put to death. Agnosticsherbet Apr 2015 #67
I agree that the deal makes sense for the US oberliner Apr 2015 #73
I have relatives in Israel, so I do understand their perspective. Agnosticsherbet Apr 2015 #92
"It is a pity that neither nation has humanitarian leaders." THAT is the core of the problem imo. Rex Apr 2015 #105
maybe Bibi is crying because Israels position as king is ending Backwoodsrider Apr 2015 #70
So it's not Bibi who is the warmonger, it's Israel in general? oberliner Apr 2015 #77
Who put Bibi in his current position? LordGlenconner Apr 2015 #91
Actually, he was elected by about 25% of the Israeli population Oilwellian Apr 2015 #172
According to your op: yes. Warren Stupidity Apr 2015 #124
Anyone who says Iran is not worthy of serious watching, isn't paying attention. herding cats Apr 2015 #75
+1 n/t Adrahil Apr 2015 #81
If Israel wants to start a way, they are on their own, IMO. Adrahil Apr 2015 #80
What has Israel done to piss off Khamenei? B Calm Apr 2015 #83
Existing oberliner Apr 2015 #86
So. . Has he ever attacked Israel? B Calm Apr 2015 #88
Yes, repeatedly and consistently year after year oberliner Apr 2015 #118
So it must be the arms Reagan gave to Iran?. Looks like Israel fight is with the United States. B Calm Apr 2015 #126
Does that mean that America attacked Palestine, since we provide many of the bombs and vetos? bravenak Apr 2015 #127
Many Palestinians certainly see it that way oberliner Apr 2015 #144
Then I suppose the only way for the US to have much influence in the area is to break up with Israel bravenak Apr 2015 #262
Nobody puts Bibi in a corner! ` LordGlenconner Apr 2015 #85
Thats why having a deal and having it under control treestar Apr 2015 #89
Gee who to believe...a username on the WWW or US and Isreali scholars. Rex Apr 2015 #97
I agree that the deal is a good one oberliner Apr 2015 #120
Well it is insulting to make people out to be supporting Iran, because they Rex Apr 2015 #125
Mostly the stupid or deluded ones, I think. Orsino Apr 2015 #98
the deal keeps iran from developing nukes...... spanone Apr 2015 #104
They are fear mongering. They have bombs, Iran does not. Bibi has said inflammatory things Pisces Apr 2015 #109
Boo Hoo. Arugula Latte Apr 2015 #112
Don't worry, if we roll over and "except the inevitable", they will be obliterated soon enough! PassingFair Apr 2015 #114
+1 n/t Oilwellian Apr 2015 #174
By his deeds shall a man be known malaise Apr 2015 #122
Details, details... R. Daneel Olivaw Apr 2015 #252
Except for one thing. Ageless Democrat Apr 2015 #273
No, I don't find it understandable BainsBane Apr 2015 #130
"Iran is not run by a dictator. What the fuck are you even spewing?" oberliner Apr 2015 #131
Uninformed how? BainsBane Apr 2015 #133
I have always understood that Iran was inhibited by peaceful Persians. B Calm Apr 2015 #136
Lobbyists call the shots. Scrabbleddie Apr 2015 #137
A better deal than expected - an Israeli op-ed question everything Apr 2015 #139
If they are truly that concerned, what the hell is keeping them from attacking Iran? ... LannyDeVaney Apr 2015 #141
There are a host of reasons oberliner Apr 2015 #142
You mean like our invasion twice of Iraq? still_one Apr 2015 #180
If war is the thing that Israelis fear, then I fail to see why they would not celebrate. lumberjack_jeff Apr 2015 #143
Boo-fucking-hoo! Dismantle your 'apartheid state' and then perhaps a discussion can be had. eom Purveyor Apr 2015 #151
Who cares what ann--- Apr 2015 #160
Of course Depaysement Apr 2015 #167
in what possible sense is it "understandable" gcomeau Apr 2015 #170
And Bibi said there will never be a 2-state solution. randome Apr 2015 #171
Netanyahu has done more damage to Israel and its security, than its enemies. still_one Apr 2015 #179
I don't see how anyone could think otherwise. randome Apr 2015 #181
Hell, Israel needs someone like Rabin, but the radicals in his country assassinated him, just like still_one Apr 2015 #182
Netanyahu will go down as the man who did what Nasser, Saddam, the ayatollahs, geek tragedy Apr 2015 #184
Either that or turning Israel into another hifiguy Apr 2015 #192
Absitively and posolutely. hifiguy Apr 2015 #191
Um alcibiades_mystery Apr 2015 #173
Israel will be the first to strike RedstDem Apr 2015 #189
"Dehumanizing rhetoric" like "mowing the lawn"? randome Apr 2015 #198
Yet Israel gets to keep their nukes & a pat on the back by the good ole US? U4ikLefty Apr 2015 #202
Doesn't look like this thread went the way you were hoping, Oberliner Scootaloo Apr 2015 #204
Sorry, this reminds me of people who complained about Obama's idea for two free years Starry Messenger Apr 2015 #209
"Khamenei isn't the sole ruler of Iran." oberliner Apr 2015 #236
You're right, let's never deal diplomatically with them again. Starry Messenger Apr 2015 #245
It's funny; when Ahmadinejad was president, you barely heard people talk about Khameini. We Chathamization Apr 2015 #240
Bingo. Starry Messenger Apr 2015 #246
Bibi doen't like it? eridani Apr 2015 #213
... Cali_Democrat Apr 2015 #214
So I thought we all wanted peace in the Middle East? Or just another 'thanks Obama' moment? Rex Apr 2015 #230
Oberliner: Yes, Khomeini is a menace to his own people and others. I hope is this will usher in an freshwest Apr 2015 #232
Thanks for sharing your thoughts oberliner Apr 2015 #235
Tough. If they want a war, let them spend THEIR blood and treasure.. whathehell Apr 2015 #234
Does it chap yer backside that diplomacy wins today? R. Daneel Olivaw Apr 2015 #241
No I think the deal is great and I am very pleased that an agreement was reached oberliner Apr 2015 #249
So let's start a war because of some comments? DCBob Apr 2015 #265
if we used that logic that would lead the U.S. to do something like say invade Iraq....... still_one Apr 2015 #280
Yes, understandably rjsquirrel Apr 2015 #270
Oh Mah G-D! Aerows Apr 2015 #277
. bravenak Apr 2015 #279
I'm so sick of Aerows Apr 2015 #282
This thread is filled with circular logic and outright lying. bravenak Apr 2015 #286
OK, I see your point. qwlauren35 Apr 2015 #284
And the Israeli government doesn't have disdain for Iran? Blue_In_AK Apr 2015 #291
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Israelis are understandab...»Reply #232