Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Israelis are understandably not thrilled with the Iran deal [View all]freshwest
(53,661 posts)232. Oberliner: Yes, Khomeini is a menace to his own people and others. I hope is this will usher in an
Iran that is more secular and less zealous. The fanaticism has done nothing but oppress their own people and compound tensions in the area.
Their fears are NOT unfounded. No one can ignore a neighbor who calls for one's death. Americans know what can happen.
Israel is not the only target of the religious extremists or demagogues of Iran, the Ayatollahs have blood on their hands since they took over. Much of that blood is Iranian.
Some of it is on our hands.
The terms of the framework Obama and others set on Iran are the harshest ever set for any nation. Anything that goes wrong, the agreement says, Iran will 'be default' be judged and then sanctioned - many even military action will be taken:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/110228400
Sorry for the swipe at Netanyahu if you supported him. I don't live there. But TOD and TPV have an analysis of the agreement and as Obama details it in the video at the link, it's harsh. He has also said precisely what I believe you are trying to convey here, that we don't trust Iran for precisely the reasons you give. I'm sure many who voted for Netanyaho voted for him out of a sense of self-defense and not hatred of Palestinians.
I hope that secularists in Israel will take some heart in that and not fall for those who would terrify them if there truly is a way out of the morass they have been for so long. This kind of rhetoric is a demonization of many peoples just before a strike is made.
Not all hearts in those nations agree with the extremists in either:
I've seen other videos of Israelis and Palestinians trying the one on one approach, main;y by those who have lost their family members to terror and bombings, etc. to get peace in the region. I guess they are in the ranks of the Israeli left.
Of course the MIC media that infects virtually every nation doesn't give their views air time. Instead, the propagandists monopolize media with fear and hatred. And I'm not even talking about the people who live in the war zones.
AFAIK, Israel has been in a constant state of war from agreements ending, made twenty years before as the Ottoman Empire collapsed, but Jews had been returning since 1881, but really, they sought to return since they were run out by the Romans:
Zionism and the British mandate
The first wave of modern Jewish migration to Ottoman-ruled Palestine, known as the First Aliyah, began in 1881, as Jews fled pogroms in Eastern Europe.[100] Although the Zionist movement already existed in practice, Austro-Hungarian journalist Theodor Herzl is credited with founding political Zionism,[101] a movement which sought to establish a Jewish state in the Land of Israel, by elevating the Jewish Question to the international plane.[102] In 1896, Herzl published Der Judenstaat (The State of the Jews), offering his vision of a future Jewish state; the following year he presided over the first World Zionist Congress.[103]
The Second Aliyah (190414), began after the Kishinev pogrom; some 40,000 Jews settled in Palestine, although nearly half of them left eventually.[100] Both the first and second waves of migrants were mainly Orthodox Jews,[104] although the Second Aliyah included socialist groups who established the kibbutz movement.[105] During World War I, British Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour sent the Balfour Declaration of 1917 to Baron Rothschild (Walter Rothschild, 2nd Baron Rothschild), a leader of the British Jewish community, that stated that Britain intended for the creation of a Jewish homeland within the Palestinian Mandate.[106][107]
The Jewish Legion, a group primarily of Zionist volunteers, assisted, in 1918, in the British conquest of Palestine.[108] Arab opposition to British rule and Jewish immigration led to the 1920 Palestine riots and the formation of a Jewish militia known as the Haganah (meaning "The Defense" in Hebrew), from which the Irgun and Lehi, or Stern Gang, paramilitary groups later split off.[109] In 1922, the League of Nations granted Britain a mandate over Palestine under terms similar to the Balfour Declaration.[110] The population of the area at this time was predominantly Arab and Muslim, with Jews accounting for about 11%,[111] Christians 9.5%.[112]
The Third (191923) and Fourth Aliyahs (192429) brought an additional 100,000 Jews to Palestine.[100]
Finally, the rise of Nazism and the increasing persecution of Jews in the 1930s led to the Fifth Aliyah, with an influx of a quarter of a million Jews. This was a major cause of the Arab revolt of 193639 in which the British killed 5,032 Arabs and wounded 14,760,[113] and resulting in over ten percent of the adult male Palestinian Arab population killed, wounded, imprisoned or exiled.[114] The British introduced restrictions on Jewish immigration to Palestine with the White Paper of 1939. With countries around the world turning away Jewish refugees fleeing the Holocaust, a clandestine movement known as Aliyah Bet was organized to bring Jews to Palestine.[100] By the end of World War II, the Jewish population of Palestine had increased to 33% of the total population.
Israeli Independence:
In 1947, the British government announced it would withdraw from Mandatory Palestine, stating it was unable to arrive at a solution acceptable to both Arabs and Jews.
On 15 May 1947, the General Assembly of the newly formed United Nations resolved that a committee, United Nations Special Committee on Palestine (UNSCOP), be created "to prepare for consideration at the next regular session of the Assembly a report on the question of Palestine".[118] In the Report of the Committee dated 3 September 1947 to the UN General Assembly,[119] the majority of the Committee in Chapter VI proposed a plan to replace the British Mandate with "an independent Arab State, an independent Jewish State, and the City of Jerusalem ... the last to be under an International Trusteeship System".[120] On 29 November 1947, the General Assembly adopted a resolution recommending the adoption and implementation of the Plan of Partition with Economic Union as Resolution 181 (II).[121] The Plan attached to the resolution was essentially that proposed by the majority of the Committee in the Report of 3 September 1947.
The Jewish Agency, which was the recognized representative of the Jewish community, accepted the plan. The Arab League and Arab Higher Committee of Palestine rejected it, and indicated that they would reject any other plan of partition.
On the following day, the 1 December 1947, the Arab Higher Committee proclaimed a three-day strike, and Arab bands began attacking Jewish targets.[124] The Jews were initially on the defensive as civil war broke out, but gradually moved onto the offensive.[125] The Palestinian Arab economy collapsed and 250,000 Palestinian Arabs fled or were expelled.[126]
On 14 May 1948, the day before the expiration of the British Mandate, David Ben-Gurion, the head of the Jewish Agency, declared "the establishment of a Jewish state in Eretz-Israel, to be known as the State of Israel".[127][128] The only reference in the text of the Declaration to the borders of the new state is the use of the term, Eretz-Israel...[129]
The following day, the armies of four Arab countriesEgypt, Syria, Transjordan and Iraqentered what had been British Mandatory Palestine, launching the 1948 ArabIsraeli War;[131][132] Contingents from Yemen, Morocco, Saudi Arabia and Sudan joined the war.[133][134] The apparent purpose of the invasion was to prevent the establishment of the Jewish state at inception, and some Arab leaders talked about driving the Jews into the sea.[135][136][137] According to Benny Morris, Jews felt that the invading Arab armies aimed to slaughter the Jews.[138] The Arab league stated that the invasion was to restore law and order and to prevent further bloodshed.[139]
After a year of fighting, a ceasefire was declared and temporary borders, known as the Green Line, were established.[140] Jordan annexed what became known as the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and Egypt took control of the Gaza Strip. The United Nations estimated that more than 700,000 Palestinians were expelled by or fled from advancing Israeli forces during the conflictwhat would became known in Arabic as the Nakba ("catastrophe" ...[141]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel
Of course, none of this is news to you, I'm just posting it for reference. Researching this from a secular view, I came to the conclusion that the creation of Israel as it now exists was not just imperialism on the side of the British, but what happened as great empires rise and fall. I'm not sure of the adjective great in application to any empire, but it's rather foolish to deny the centuries of caliphates which were empires in the area.
I suspect Israelis live and breathe the reality of empires that once existed there, and those trying to restore themselves such as the Daesh are doing now. Jews are a minority in that part of the world. When I say they have been a constant state of war, it is not as slander on either side. But a statement of fact. They have never really been accepted, just a look at the Wikipedia entries, which are most likely the weakest as they can be edited, show everything is disputed.
There is fear on all sides and unjust ideologies and religious extremism at work in the region. And Iran's wild statements - which I will emphasize again are from religious RWNJs that drone on constantly and hopefully not held by thinking people in general - give a distorted view. IMO.
Israel has adopted, rightly or wrongly, a fortress mentality because of this. And Netanyahu was reelected from the fears of Israelis combined with horrific experiences, both there and elsewhere. The pain keeps building.
I really want this deal to suceed, and I believe that it will help to liberalize Iranian thinking. It will not be all that pleasant as the voices of hate are very strong and well-practiced.
Thanks for posting this thread. I don't have time to read the other posts, these are merely my thoughts to you, oberliner. I wish the people of the region wisdom to find a better path.
Their fears are NOT unfounded. No one can ignore a neighbor who calls for one's death. Americans know what can happen.
Israel is not the only target of the religious extremists or demagogues of Iran, the Ayatollahs have blood on their hands since they took over. Much of that blood is Iranian.
Some of it is on our hands.
The terms of the framework Obama and others set on Iran are the harshest ever set for any nation. Anything that goes wrong, the agreement says, Iran will 'be default' be judged and then sanctioned - many even military action will be taken:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/110228400
Sorry for the swipe at Netanyahu if you supported him. I don't live there. But TOD and TPV have an analysis of the agreement and as Obama details it in the video at the link, it's harsh. He has also said precisely what I believe you are trying to convey here, that we don't trust Iran for precisely the reasons you give. I'm sure many who voted for Netanyaho voted for him out of a sense of self-defense and not hatred of Palestinians.
I hope that secularists in Israel will take some heart in that and not fall for those who would terrify them if there truly is a way out of the morass they have been for so long. This kind of rhetoric is a demonization of many peoples just before a strike is made.
Not all hearts in those nations agree with the extremists in either:
I've seen other videos of Israelis and Palestinians trying the one on one approach, main;y by those who have lost their family members to terror and bombings, etc. to get peace in the region. I guess they are in the ranks of the Israeli left.
Of course the MIC media that infects virtually every nation doesn't give their views air time. Instead, the propagandists monopolize media with fear and hatred. And I'm not even talking about the people who live in the war zones.
AFAIK, Israel has been in a constant state of war from agreements ending, made twenty years before as the Ottoman Empire collapsed, but Jews had been returning since 1881, but really, they sought to return since they were run out by the Romans:
Zionism and the British mandate
The first wave of modern Jewish migration to Ottoman-ruled Palestine, known as the First Aliyah, began in 1881, as Jews fled pogroms in Eastern Europe.[100] Although the Zionist movement already existed in practice, Austro-Hungarian journalist Theodor Herzl is credited with founding political Zionism,[101] a movement which sought to establish a Jewish state in the Land of Israel, by elevating the Jewish Question to the international plane.[102] In 1896, Herzl published Der Judenstaat (The State of the Jews), offering his vision of a future Jewish state; the following year he presided over the first World Zionist Congress.[103]
The Second Aliyah (190414), began after the Kishinev pogrom; some 40,000 Jews settled in Palestine, although nearly half of them left eventually.[100] Both the first and second waves of migrants were mainly Orthodox Jews,[104] although the Second Aliyah included socialist groups who established the kibbutz movement.[105] During World War I, British Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour sent the Balfour Declaration of 1917 to Baron Rothschild (Walter Rothschild, 2nd Baron Rothschild), a leader of the British Jewish community, that stated that Britain intended for the creation of a Jewish homeland within the Palestinian Mandate.[106][107]
The Jewish Legion, a group primarily of Zionist volunteers, assisted, in 1918, in the British conquest of Palestine.[108] Arab opposition to British rule and Jewish immigration led to the 1920 Palestine riots and the formation of a Jewish militia known as the Haganah (meaning "The Defense" in Hebrew), from which the Irgun and Lehi, or Stern Gang, paramilitary groups later split off.[109] In 1922, the League of Nations granted Britain a mandate over Palestine under terms similar to the Balfour Declaration.[110] The population of the area at this time was predominantly Arab and Muslim, with Jews accounting for about 11%,[111] Christians 9.5%.[112]
The Third (191923) and Fourth Aliyahs (192429) brought an additional 100,000 Jews to Palestine.[100]
Finally, the rise of Nazism and the increasing persecution of Jews in the 1930s led to the Fifth Aliyah, with an influx of a quarter of a million Jews. This was a major cause of the Arab revolt of 193639 in which the British killed 5,032 Arabs and wounded 14,760,[113] and resulting in over ten percent of the adult male Palestinian Arab population killed, wounded, imprisoned or exiled.[114] The British introduced restrictions on Jewish immigration to Palestine with the White Paper of 1939. With countries around the world turning away Jewish refugees fleeing the Holocaust, a clandestine movement known as Aliyah Bet was organized to bring Jews to Palestine.[100] By the end of World War II, the Jewish population of Palestine had increased to 33% of the total population.
Israeli Independence:
In 1947, the British government announced it would withdraw from Mandatory Palestine, stating it was unable to arrive at a solution acceptable to both Arabs and Jews.
On 15 May 1947, the General Assembly of the newly formed United Nations resolved that a committee, United Nations Special Committee on Palestine (UNSCOP), be created "to prepare for consideration at the next regular session of the Assembly a report on the question of Palestine".[118] In the Report of the Committee dated 3 September 1947 to the UN General Assembly,[119] the majority of the Committee in Chapter VI proposed a plan to replace the British Mandate with "an independent Arab State, an independent Jewish State, and the City of Jerusalem ... the last to be under an International Trusteeship System".[120] On 29 November 1947, the General Assembly adopted a resolution recommending the adoption and implementation of the Plan of Partition with Economic Union as Resolution 181 (II).[121] The Plan attached to the resolution was essentially that proposed by the majority of the Committee in the Report of 3 September 1947.
The Jewish Agency, which was the recognized representative of the Jewish community, accepted the plan. The Arab League and Arab Higher Committee of Palestine rejected it, and indicated that they would reject any other plan of partition.
On the following day, the 1 December 1947, the Arab Higher Committee proclaimed a three-day strike, and Arab bands began attacking Jewish targets.[124] The Jews were initially on the defensive as civil war broke out, but gradually moved onto the offensive.[125] The Palestinian Arab economy collapsed and 250,000 Palestinian Arabs fled or were expelled.[126]
On 14 May 1948, the day before the expiration of the British Mandate, David Ben-Gurion, the head of the Jewish Agency, declared "the establishment of a Jewish state in Eretz-Israel, to be known as the State of Israel".[127][128] The only reference in the text of the Declaration to the borders of the new state is the use of the term, Eretz-Israel...[129]
The following day, the armies of four Arab countriesEgypt, Syria, Transjordan and Iraqentered what had been British Mandatory Palestine, launching the 1948 ArabIsraeli War;[131][132] Contingents from Yemen, Morocco, Saudi Arabia and Sudan joined the war.[133][134] The apparent purpose of the invasion was to prevent the establishment of the Jewish state at inception, and some Arab leaders talked about driving the Jews into the sea.[135][136][137] According to Benny Morris, Jews felt that the invading Arab armies aimed to slaughter the Jews.[138] The Arab league stated that the invasion was to restore law and order and to prevent further bloodshed.[139]
After a year of fighting, a ceasefire was declared and temporary borders, known as the Green Line, were established.[140] Jordan annexed what became known as the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and Egypt took control of the Gaza Strip. The United Nations estimated that more than 700,000 Palestinians were expelled by or fled from advancing Israeli forces during the conflictwhat would became known in Arabic as the Nakba ("catastrophe" ...[141]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel
Of course, none of this is news to you, I'm just posting it for reference. Researching this from a secular view, I came to the conclusion that the creation of Israel as it now exists was not just imperialism on the side of the British, but what happened as great empires rise and fall. I'm not sure of the adjective great in application to any empire, but it's rather foolish to deny the centuries of caliphates which were empires in the area.
I suspect Israelis live and breathe the reality of empires that once existed there, and those trying to restore themselves such as the Daesh are doing now. Jews are a minority in that part of the world. When I say they have been a constant state of war, it is not as slander on either side. But a statement of fact. They have never really been accepted, just a look at the Wikipedia entries, which are most likely the weakest as they can be edited, show everything is disputed.
There is fear on all sides and unjust ideologies and religious extremism at work in the region. And Iran's wild statements - which I will emphasize again are from religious RWNJs that drone on constantly and hopefully not held by thinking people in general - give a distorted view. IMO.
Israel has adopted, rightly or wrongly, a fortress mentality because of this. And Netanyahu was reelected from the fears of Israelis combined with horrific experiences, both there and elsewhere. The pain keeps building.
I really want this deal to suceed, and I believe that it will help to liberalize Iranian thinking. It will not be all that pleasant as the voices of hate are very strong and well-practiced.
Thanks for posting this thread. I don't have time to read the other posts, these are merely my thoughts to you, oberliner. I wish the people of the region wisdom to find a better path.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
291 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You do realize there was another not clipped statement...NOT a year ago, just 2 weeks ago..here ya go:
Fred Sanders
Apr 2015
#1
What is your plan to keep Iran from getting nuclear weapons, has Israel ever thought about
Thinkingabout
Apr 2015
#2
Let's see how successful you are in accomplishing this. Another reason to see the details
Thinkingabout
Apr 2015
#275
LOL.. Yeah, they're real Grumpy and calling out the President for being ..wait for it.. the horrors
Cha
Apr 2015
#226
When the Israelis come up with an alernative other than WAR WAR WAR then I will have
geek tragedy
Apr 2015
#7
No, the Iranian government is not trustworthy. Which is why the deal calls for intrusive
geek tragedy
Apr 2015
#10
Funny - we were assured for years that Iran had a Kumbaya Program, not a nuclear one.
Dreamer Tatum
Apr 2015
#17
Bibi wants the US to go to war with Iran, just like he pushed for us to invade
geek tragedy
Apr 2015
#27
No problem.. I said it was "a time waster.." to the OP.. but actually it was worth it to me
Cha
Apr 2015
#231
The hasbara crowd rivals only the Kremlin trolls in their denial of the obvious nt
geek tragedy
Apr 2015
#51
Hey, Aloha bravenak.. I did the OP's Google search for him. Thought I would share it..
Cha
Apr 2015
#225
'If you take out Saddam, Saddam’s regime, I guarantee you that it will have enormous positive
geek tragedy
Apr 2015
#49
And a lot of Israeli military and government people were saying the exact opposite
Mosby
Apr 2015
#256
Manipulated by Bibi, anyhow. Not the sharpest tool in the shed in the first placd.
bravenak
Apr 2015
#64
You are partially right as it was Sharon that pushed the Iraqi invasion/debacle. See link below.
Purveyor
Apr 2015
#155
You are absolutely right on that one. The U.S. invaded Iraq twice without anyones encouragement,
still_one
Apr 2015
#178
It is NOT BS At All. It's true. what a time waster to google for members of DU.. who get it So
Cha
Apr 2015
#224
You do realize in 1953 we overthrew the Democratically elected government in Iran and
still_one
Apr 2015
#176
well, no, but I was in the thread where they flamed out by bashing Obama with links
geek tragedy
Apr 2015
#132
who here is ascribing the very best of intentions to Iran's government? nt
geek tragedy
Apr 2015
#78
No one here has said that the Iranian government is good - as to Netanyahu I take him at his word
karynnj
Apr 2015
#116
But Israel maintains an occupation and control of the borders and waterways of Palestine.
bravenak
Apr 2015
#274
Building settlements in the legal occupied territories was illegal per the same UN
karynnj
Apr 2015
#289
How many nukes does Iran have? How many does Israel have? Which one is being inspected?
Tierra_y_Libertad
Apr 2015
#115
I don't think Iran considers any nation a threat. As for the US being a "threat" to Iran...
Dreamer Tatum
Apr 2015
#149
I can give you a list they regularly threaten to annihilate, but you already know it by heart. nt
Dreamer Tatum
Apr 2015
#158
"they held Americans hostage for over a year and we did nothing. Some threat"
AgingAmerican
Apr 2015
#263
Then why are people calling this a way for Iran to meet Israel's "threat?" nt
Dreamer Tatum
Apr 2015
#11
There are a lot of people walking around claiming that this deal negates Israel's nuclear threat.
Dreamer Tatum
Apr 2015
#21
That's not what he did at all. However you are welcome to whatever delusion you choose.
Rex
Apr 2015
#259
I'm sorry that you can't relate to other posters without engaging in persoanl attacks
Mosby
Apr 2015
#264
You think it's great just like Bibi never encouraged the US to invade Iraq. nt
geek tragedy
Apr 2015
#60
Mossad has also repudiated Netanyahu’s political manipulation of the Iran threat.
sinkingfeeling
Apr 2015
#13
I wonder if the deal will limit the "Death to America" chants to just a couple a week.
Dreamer Tatum
Apr 2015
#26
You might want to go back and read what some of the Bush neocons 'chanted' and then put into ACTION
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#50
My post is FACT. Are you denying the now infamous threats from neocons like Michael Ledeen?
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#82
No, your schtick is that people who favor negotiations over war must be naive
geek tragedy
Apr 2015
#76
The split is not between people who trust the ayatollahs and those who don't.
geek tragedy
Apr 2015
#87
Amazing how they can say (1) this is a bad deal and (2) no of course I don't
geek tragedy
Apr 2015
#96
Well, I'm not terribly pro-Israel these days, but I do favor the right of everyone
geek tragedy
Apr 2015
#103
I don't trust anyone, actually, but I trust least THOSE WHO TELEVISE DEATH TO AMERICA AND ISRAEL.
Dreamer Tatum
Apr 2015
#129
Look, I get it. To make the deal the life-altering thing you claim it is...
Dreamer Tatum
Apr 2015
#159
You offer nothing else. We now have intrusive inspections to make sure they don't get nukes. What
neverforget
Apr 2015
#219
McCain did that chant on tv. He also said selling Iran cigarettes is ok because it kills them.
arcane1
Apr 2015
#134
Please link to McCain leading a throng with specifically that chant. I will wait. Forever. nt
Dreamer Tatum
Apr 2015
#146
Well, the Iranian leader did, you see. And McCain is a grumpy old bastard with no power.
Dreamer Tatum
Apr 2015
#150
Well then we ought to be even-stevens by now. Yet they still howl for your death and mine on TV. nt
Dreamer Tatum
Apr 2015
#156
And hold candlelight vigils in the streets of Tehran after the US was attacked
truebluegreen
Apr 2015
#161
Part of your demonization of me requires that you assume I disregard the Iranian people.
Dreamer Tatum
Apr 2015
#165
I thought that was a national holiday in Iran… not a daily occurrence
world wide wally
Apr 2015
#168
Because the Arab coalition would have crumbled once the Israelis were Involved...
DemocratSinceBirth
Apr 2015
#108
I acknowledge that it might not be just that Israelis wanted to start a war against Iran - 47 GOP
leveymg
Apr 2015
#37
Maybe those are reactions to the constant threats from ISRAEL to use TACTICAL NUKES
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#40
You don't remember that throughout the Bush years? But we don't even have to go back
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#117
The Republicants threatened to use nukes on Iran not the Israelis...
DemocratSinceBirth
Apr 2015
#123
Wrong, the Israelis threatened to use Tactical Nukes during the Bush years. Of course Republicans
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#140
I'm going to need a citation that the Israelis threatened to use nuclear weapons ...
DemocratSinceBirth
Apr 2015
#169
Back pedaling now? You did not believe that Israel threatened AND worse, PLANNED to use tactical
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#195
Yes but they have never publicly threatened to use nuclear weapons, especially on Iran...
DemocratSinceBirth
Apr 2015
#188
Israel his issued almost daily threats implying use of nukes against Iran for more than decade.
leveymg
Apr 2015
#193
Israel's nuclear "ambiguity" policy is to evade NPT sanctions. It has been very clear about threats
leveymg
Apr 2015
#251
the right wing war mongerers running the Israeli government are not "Israel".
Warren Stupidity
Apr 2015
#61
Stalin was our close allie in WWII. Under Stalin about 20 were put to death.
Agnosticsherbet
Apr 2015
#67
"It is a pity that neither nation has humanitarian leaders." THAT is the core of the problem imo.
Rex
Apr 2015
#105
Anyone who says Iran is not worthy of serious watching, isn't paying attention.
herding cats
Apr 2015
#75
So it must be the arms Reagan gave to Iran?. Looks like Israel fight is with the United States.
B Calm
Apr 2015
#126
Does that mean that America attacked Palestine, since we provide many of the bombs and vetos?
bravenak
Apr 2015
#127
Then I suppose the only way for the US to have much influence in the area is to break up with Israel
bravenak
Apr 2015
#262
They are fear mongering. They have bombs, Iran does not. Bibi has said inflammatory things
Pisces
Apr 2015
#109
Don't worry, if we roll over and "except the inevitable", they will be obliterated soon enough!
PassingFair
Apr 2015
#114
If they are truly that concerned, what the hell is keeping them from attacking Iran? ...
LannyDeVaney
Apr 2015
#141
If war is the thing that Israelis fear, then I fail to see why they would not celebrate.
lumberjack_jeff
Apr 2015
#143
Boo-fucking-hoo! Dismantle your 'apartheid state' and then perhaps a discussion can be had. eom
Purveyor
Apr 2015
#151
Netanyahu has done more damage to Israel and its security, than its enemies.
still_one
Apr 2015
#179
Hell, Israel needs someone like Rabin, but the radicals in his country assassinated him, just like
still_one
Apr 2015
#182
Netanyahu will go down as the man who did what Nasser, Saddam, the ayatollahs,
geek tragedy
Apr 2015
#184
Sorry, this reminds me of people who complained about Obama's idea for two free years
Starry Messenger
Apr 2015
#209
It's funny; when Ahmadinejad was president, you barely heard people talk about Khameini. We
Chathamization
Apr 2015
#240
So I thought we all wanted peace in the Middle East? Or just another 'thanks Obama' moment?
Rex
Apr 2015
#230
Oberliner: Yes, Khomeini is a menace to his own people and others. I hope is this will usher in an
freshwest
Apr 2015
#232
No I think the deal is great and I am very pleased that an agreement was reached
oberliner
Apr 2015
#249
if we used that logic that would lead the U.S. to do something like say invade Iraq.......
still_one
Apr 2015
#280