General Discussion

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)

43. You did not address any of my refutations of your so called point. Your verbiage is insulting.

Sat Apr 4, 2015, 12:20 PM

Apr 2015

Your response the classic dismissal of the privileged white straight man. You claimed LGBT equality is not costing anyone any money, when the lack of equality cost us dearly and the creation of equality will in fact cost business and government a great deal of money. What you claimed was bullshit and it still lies there stinking up the place and drawing flies.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

54 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Ok... I'm Doubling Down... No Poll... Can We Just Admit That Bi-Partisanship Is Dead And Gone ??? [View all] WillyT Apr 2015 OP

IMO bi-partisanship is wishful thinking anymore. The republicans just keep hardening more and RKP5637 Apr 2015 #1

Agree about GOP. Have never seen Dems. so inactive. To me this country seems extremely appalachiablue Apr 2015 #12

I don't know, they might agree on congressional raises still_one Apr 2015 #2

And protecting Wall Street! Dustlawyer Apr 2015 #18

You've got to be kidding. woo me with science Apr 2015 #3

This message was self-deleted by its author Scrabbleddie Apr 2015 #4

I Agree woo... Have You Seen This: WillyT Apr 2015 #6

Thank you. woo me with science Apr 2015 #39

Wow. Wolf-pac is a bipartisan group, it favors the term 'cross partisan' heavily and uses lots of Bluenorthwest Apr 2015 #45

Yeah... At The State Level... There Is Bi-Partisan Agreement On The Corruption At The Federal Level WillyT Apr 2015 #49

Wow, what a list, deserving it's own OP imho corkhead Apr 2015 #8

Thank you. 840high Apr 2015 #10

Damn straight. F4lconF16 Apr 2015 #13

Yeah really. They agree on a lot of stuff. Cheese Sandwich Apr 2015 #14

The serious differences are always the things that money does not care about. zeemike Apr 2015 #25

On the contrary: there is a ton of money in that. F4lconF16 Apr 2015 #29

Points well made zeemike Apr 2015 #32

Outstanding post. woo me with science Apr 2015 #38

�if the American people knew what we have done, they would string us up from the lamp posts.� Dont call me Shirley Apr 2015 #54

How is it that spousal benefits can be extended to millions of LGBT people by government and by Bluenorthwest Apr 2015 #33

People on this site tend to view things from a very white, straight, middle class perspective. F4lconF16 Apr 2015 #35

They are self damaging. Bluenorthwest Apr 2015 #44

Well I think you missed the point altogether. zeemike Apr 2015 #36

You did not address any of my refutations of your so called point. Your verbiage is insulting. Bluenorthwest Apr 2015 #43

Well I find your all out assault on me insulting too zeemike Apr 2015 #47

The 14 Defining Characteristics Of Fascism (http://www.rense.com/general37/fascism.htm): blkmusclmachine Apr 2015 #20

^^This!^^ BrotherIvan Apr 2015 #28

We are there. It's way past time to stop using euphemisms woo me with science Apr 2015 #40

DU Rec RiverLover Apr 2015 #31

Exactly. K&R 99Forever Apr 2015 #37

oh come on; d's & r's quickly got together to save the banksters from their own folly. ND-Dem Apr 2015 #5

Eliminating earmarks really fucked the system up. PeteSelman Apr 2015 #7

Yep. Earmarks were the grease that kept things moving. jeff47 Apr 2015 #42

There isn't any now - LiberalElite Apr 2015 #9

Buy-Partisan where there's $. When it comes to people, the environment & the US, not so much. appalachiablue Apr 2015 #11

Yes it's dead, but it's more complicated. We now live in a country where the two parties rhett o rick Apr 2015 #15

Yep. The two wings of The Money Party. nt hifiguy Apr 2015 #48

K & R Thespian2 Apr 2015 #16

"Bi-partisanship" is just the cover Democrats use to explain why they "HAVE" to go Right. blkmusclmachine Apr 2015 #17

+1 liberal_at_heart Apr 2015 #22

No. It is but we can't admit it. Chan790 Apr 2015 #19

We do not negotiate with terrorists. JEB Apr 2015 #21

Good! Man from Pickens Apr 2015 #23

No it is more like tri-partisanship. zeemike Apr 2015 #24

The Beltway's idea of "bipartisan" was when Liebermann stood with McCain.... Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2015 #26

Bi-Partisianship is dead on social issues Joe Turner Apr 2015 #27

Everyone knows the Gov runs better RandiFan1290 Apr 2015 #30

There shouldn't be, but there will be. stillwaiting Apr 2015 #34

I've noticed this...the 3rd way and progressives cant' get together anymore HereSince1628 Apr 2015 #41

Yah, well, here's the problem with what you're saying. MineralMan Apr 2015 #46

You got that right. Blue_In_AK Apr 2015 #50

Agree... malokvale77 Apr 2015 #51

You Are Quite Welcome !!! WillyT Apr 2015 #52

You are one of a handfull... malokvale77 Apr 2015 #53