One of the things that keeps me from backing HRC - not her being corporate or being a hawk

[AtomicKitten]

24. I see you've doubled down on your baseless accusation of misquoting an article I posted.

I thought I'd give you some time to rethink your ridiculous accusation in light of the fact that you clearly and embarrassingly did not read the article I posted upthread entitled "The 13 Words You Cannot Write About Hillary Clinton Anymore" from http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2015/03/26/the-13-words-you-cant-write-about-hillary-clinton-anymore/

Not only are the 13 words listed in a series of tweets referenced by the article, but an entire paragraph of their very own:

So these words are now off the table: "polarizing," "calculating," "disingenuous," "insincere," "ambitious," "inevitable," "entitled," "over-confident," "secretive," "will do anything to win," "represents the past," and "out of touch."

The rest of your snotty response is crap just as your declarative OPs in which you issue blanket dismissal of fact (e.g., Sidney Blumenthal's spy network working with then SOS Clinton) in an effort to smooth over Hillary Clinton's bumpy ride at State.

Be warned that Hillary Clinton's record and in particular her record at State will be discussed and dissected and mulled over in this vetting process. You can huff and puff and try to blow those discussions down with complaints of Hillary being put upon in some way, but the conversation will be had regardless.