Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
6. Well, if even progressives want to give every shithead criminal 20 years for pretty much anything
Sat Apr 4, 2015, 05:33 PM
Apr 2015

You're going to need more jails. This is a nice sentiment, but to operationalize it, we have to start seeing 5 years or less as a pretty good punishment for MOST offenses. We have to start thinking about alternative sentences and restorative justice. There's no getting around that. Right now, we're at "20 years!" "30 years!" "Life without parole!!!" for a remarkable number of offenders, even on a putatively liberal board. Look at pretty much any thread here that discusses crime. You can't untangle "victims rights" discourse from "private prison" policy and "more jails policy." They are all of a piece.

But I know what I am. I am a bleeding heart liberal and in the minority. I don't think an 18 year old poor kid armed robber should get 20 years in state prison. That's crazy to me. But that's the general drift of the matter, even on a liberal board. Hell, half the people who support Sanders will froth at a crime story and demand the maximum punishment imaginable.

People want to believe it's just "non-violent drug offenders" being railroaded, etc.. These people are fucking stupid and wrong. You have to give up punishment fetish for a wide range of offenders (including violent offenders) if you want to effect prison reform. But that starts first in your head and heart, not "out there."

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bernie Sanders: We shoul...»Reply #6