Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)

37. I still think it will be....the Federation for the Blind

Reply to yeoman6987 (Reply #27)

Sat Apr 4, 2015, 07:04 PM

Apr 2015

doesn't back down easily....

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

37 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

9th Circuit Court rules Netflix isn�t subject to disability law [View all] n2doc Apr 2015 OP

I think I would have ruled differently. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Apr 2015 #1

I can't believe something can't be worked out yeoman6987 Apr 2015 #3

Not possible. former9thward Apr 2015 #26

Oh wow. Thanks! yeoman6987 Apr 2015 #28

Partially correect SickOfTheOnePct Apr 2015 #29

Agree 100% n/t SickOfTheOnePct Apr 2015 #8

I'm with you. Ms. Toad Apr 2015 #14

Actually SoCalNative Apr 2015 #31

Should everything sold/rented by a company be usable by the disabled? n/t SickOfTheOnePct Apr 2015 #32

No SoCalNative Apr 2015 #35

Choice v. mandate SickOfTheOnePct Apr 2015 #36

Yep. That's the way I see it too. hifiguy Apr 2015 #23

Doesn't Netflix caption its original content? ananda Apr 2015 #30

This will be overturned... VanillaRhapsody Apr 2015 #2

By the Supreme Court? yeoman6987 Apr 2015 #4

You don't think it deserves that much effort? VanillaRhapsody Apr 2015 #9

Answering for myself SickOfTheOnePct Apr 2015 #24

I was just surprised you thought it would be turned over at the SC that's all. yeoman6987 Apr 2015 #27

I still think it will be....the Federation for the Blind VanillaRhapsody Apr 2015 #37

How far should this be taken? NutmegYankee Apr 2015 #5

Section 508 applies to federal government websites SickOfTheOnePct Apr 2015 #7

No it doesn't sorry there is precedence... VanillaRhapsody Apr 2015 #11

Sorry, but you're wrong SickOfTheOnePct Apr 2015 #12

then why would Target be sued and settle? VanillaRhapsody Apr 2015 #13

I never said websites are immune SickOfTheOnePct Apr 2015 #15

WTF? VanillaRhapsody Apr 2015 #16

I highly recommend that you do some research rather than continuing to promulgate misinformation SickOfTheOnePct Apr 2015 #17

I understand what YOU are saying....but I said Precedence.. VanillaRhapsody Apr 2015 #18

Since you "do" Section 508 SickOfTheOnePct Apr 2015 #21

Netflix=video store. geek tragedy Apr 2015 #20

Exactly n/t SickOfTheOnePct Apr 2015 #22

This is really ridiculous. It's a subscription movie/show site. NutmegYankee Apr 2015 #6

I agree, the lawsuit is ridiculous n/t SickOfTheOnePct Apr 2015 #10

Take it up with the content creators. nt geek tragedy Apr 2015 #19

I agree with the outcome though not with the reason given SickOfTheOnePct Apr 2015 #25

Stupid lawsuit FLPanhandle Apr 2015 #33

Agree 100% n/t SickOfTheOnePct Apr 2015 #34