Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(6,199 posts)

4. So instead of size 0 models

Fri May 4, 2012, 08:42 PM

May 2012

they will be moving to size 2, and just photoshopping them down to size 0?

I'll believe this when I see it.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Vogue magazine's new policy bans skinny models [View all] Baitball Blogger May 2012 OP

BRAVO!!! Odin2005 May 2012 #1

So they just can't seem listless? LeftyMom May 2012 #2

"Healthy" in fashion terms = size 4 instead of size 0. Myrina May 2012 #3

Better for the kids, at least. DCKit May 2012 #6

So instead of size 0 models LadyHawkAZ May 2012 #4

.. abelenkpe May 2012 #8

Absolutely. JDPriestly May 2012 #12

Now you're talkin' guitar man May 2012 #10

Agreed !!! I'm a husky guy.... rppper May 2012 #13

I'm a thin guy guitar man May 2012 #14

what are they gonna do about the photoshopped ads? pansypoo53219 May 2012 #11

Praise the Lord! Number23 May 2012 #15

How about some realism? JNelson6563 May 2012 #16

There are technical problems... Mopar151 May 2012 #17