Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
4. How does that even relate to this story? It is physically impossible for events to have transpired
Mon Apr 6, 2015, 04:11 AM
Apr 2015

in any fashion resembling the story the woman in Rolling Stone told.

This isn't about "leave the frat alone", the frat factually didn't have anything to do with it, they weren't pledging during that fall, they didn't have a pledge party on the weekend Rolling Stone claimed... and "Jackie" invented the guy she went on the original date with, before she claimed she went out with him (and then afterwards said he - "Haven Monahan", the guy who didn't exist - assaulted her).

She showed pictures- before the 'date'- of this dashing upperclassman who she said was interested in her and texting her; she took the pictures off the social media page of some guy she went to high school with that she didn't know, and she invented everything else about the guy, including his name- totally out of whole cloth.

AND she did this before the incident took place, so.... it's not a question of "misremembering the details".


I'm no big fan of fraternities, but if they didn't actually do anything or have anything to do with anything involving this woman, yes, leave them alone is a reasonable position to take.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Rolling Stone / UVa t...»Reply #4