Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Let's say the drought lasts for the next fifty years [View all]nationalize the fed
(2,169 posts)8. Maybe sometime before that someone that matters could look around the world and see what others
are doing/have done. America gets a dry spell and people act like it's never happened anywhere else before. It's surreal.
Estimates vary widely between 15,00020,000 desalination plants around the world producing more than 20,000 m3/day.
Australia: The Millenium Drought (19972009) led to a water supply crisis across much of the country. A combination of increased water usage and lower rainfall/drought in Australia caused state governments to turn to desalination. As a result several large-scale desalination plants were constructed (see list).
Israel Desalination Enterprises' Sorek Desalination Plant in Palmachim provides up to 26,000 m³ of potable water per hour (2.300 m³ p.a.). At full capacity, it is the largest desalination plant of its kind in the world.[108][109] Once unthinkable, given Israel's history of drought and lack of available fresh water resource, with desalination, Israel can now actually produce a surplus of fresh water
The Saline Water Conversion Corporation of Saudi Arabia provides 50% of the municipal water in the Kingdom, operates a number of desalination plants, and has contracted $1.892 billion[126] to a Japanese-South Korean consortium to build a new facility capable of producing a billion liters per day, opening at the end of 2013. They currently operate 32 plants in the Kingdom;[127] one example at Shoaiba cost $1.06 billion and produces 450 million liters per day
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desalination#Existing_facilities_and_facilities_under_construction
Taking salt out of water isn't rocket science.
And money shouldn't be an object because right now the US is spending almost $20 million dollars PER HOUR on the wars and "homeland security"
Source: http://costofwar.com
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
71 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
That is what is worrying, all those millions are going to have to go somewhere
dissentient
Apr 2015
#2
Let's take a page from Putin and annex British Columbia and the Northwest Territories!
FSogol
Apr 2015
#4
Now what? California figures out what to do about decades of uncontrolled growth...
Buzz Clik
Apr 2015
#6
Maybe sometime before that someone that matters could look around the world and see what others
nationalize the fed
Apr 2015
#8
True, and Desalination should only be used as last resort, after ALL other means are employed.
NYC_SKP
Apr 2015
#49
Agriculture in California, Arizona, New Mexico collapses, and Oklahoma, Kansas, and Texas enter a dust
Agnosticsherbet
Apr 2015
#9
Arizona's issues will have to do with tapping enough power to keep everyone cool in "summer"
villager
Apr 2015
#41
Just to be clear: You imagine Arizona is sustainable in the long-term? Phoenix-area growth and all?
villager
Apr 2015
#48
The entire southwest shares a climate. Arizona is part of the Southwest.
Agnosticsherbet
Apr 2015
#56
What we are seeing in California and elsewhere in the West is Human created Climate Change.
Agnosticsherbet
Apr 2015
#69
within 4 years hundreds of small town abandoned as they rely on ground water wells...
4139
Apr 2015
#15
your timeline might be right though. It could go downhill very, very quickly, IMO.
KittyWampus
Apr 2015
#18
Yeah, but that's thinking big. I wonder if our government can even do stuff like that anymore.
KittyWampus
Apr 2015
#20
Overall no, but pumping it directly into the sea, especially near shore, would have a devistating
dbackjon
Apr 2015
#31
The damage from climate change will rapidly cause irreversible harm to billions.
NoJusticeNoPeace
Apr 2015
#29