Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Schumer bucks White House on Iran - throws his weight behind legislation to reject a deal [View all]kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)10. Three word: Israeli owned Congress! nt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
120 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Schumer bucks White House on Iran - throws his weight behind legislation to reject a deal [View all]
tracks29
Apr 2015
OP
Obama can and should veto any bill this disgraceful Congress passes. He has stated that that is
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#90
Well, he is a Democrat and that's never popular with the 3rd party squatters around here.
great white snark
Apr 2015
#13
Real Democrats dont say they wont vote for the winner of the Primary if a certain woman wins...
VanillaRhapsody
Apr 2015
#65
Nice to see you enter the discussion. Real Democrats don't betray their Party and
rhett o rick
Apr 2015
#82
I don't understand. Anyone who runs as (D) emocrat pretty much has to be a Dem Party
merrily
Apr 2015
#107
That is what Obama may need to do, ultimately..in the end. I am not confident about
Jefferson23
Apr 2015
#115
Shame on Schumer.. I hope Harry Reid decides he doesn't want him as the Minority Leader after all
Cha
Apr 2015
#118
Me too. The article on the Bipartisan 50, that is one heck of an endorsement. Although
Jefferson23
Apr 2015
#119
I am naive, but I still expect the deal to be endorsed by the Senate. n/t
lumberjack_jeff
Apr 2015
#5
If he is one of the most influential voices and the administration is igoring him
Johonny
Apr 2015
#8
and your problem with senators owned by any one particular lobbying group is....? nt
msongs
Apr 2015
#77
Damn near! And he's going to be the Democratic Senate Leader after Reid leaves. sheesh.
2banon
Apr 2015
#74
Chuck just got his marching orders from Israel. He's a good soldier for them.
BillZBubb
Apr 2015
#29
Follow the money. To who does Schumer owe felicity and allegiance? Not his own President, apparently
Fred Sanders
Apr 2015
#36
We will see what happens. Technically Obama doesn't need any of these assholes in Congress. He can
still_one
Apr 2015
#34
Another pro-war neocon Democrat. He loved the Iraq war too, so of course now he wants war with Iran
geek tragedy
Apr 2015
#50
Wow, glad you edited out that anti- Semitic comment but would still love to know
bettyellen
Apr 2015
#85
It wasn't a matter of your not supporting Israel, it was your anti-Semitic comment.
Behind the Aegis
Apr 2015
#93
Way to try to change the subject from that anti-semitic lovliness you edited out of your above post.
Warren DeMontague
Apr 2015
#101
OK, I guess I will take the abuse. I agree with Senator Schumer in this on principle. The holder
kelly1mm
Apr 2015
#62
Absolutely not - for two reasons - it is not a treaty and there is no way in hell it could pass as
karynnj
Apr 2015
#75
So long as congress is not in the loop an approving this (like the Iraq use of force decalaration)
kelly1mm
Apr 2015
#78
What @SenSchumer (AIPAC/WallSt) doesn't get is #UNSC will eliminate sanctions if #Iran complies..
Cha
Apr 2015
#84
Instead of engaging in a collective wringing of hands and wailing and gnashing of teeth,
Skidmore
Apr 2015
#109