Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Make the Confederacy's Defeat a National Holiday [View all]Laxman
(2,431 posts)36. There Might Be Something To This....
that is beyond "bashing the South". Celebrating the end of what could only be described as a horrendous war and the re-unification of the country might be worthwhile. In the aftermath of the Civil War the country wanted to pretend it never happened. Andrew Johnson bungled reconstruction after Lincoln's assassination. The failure to appropriately address the divisions that led to the war in the first place still haunt us to a degree-despite the time that has passed and the history we have shared as a nation. So,as a vehicle for shaming or taunting the South this would be a ridiculous idea. As a reminder that the war ended and the country brought back together-well there are worse things to celebrate.
The surrender completed, the two generals saluted somberly and parted. "This will live in history," said one of Grant's aides. But the Union commander seemed distracted. Having given birth to a reunited nation, he experienced a post-partum melancholy. "I felt . . . sad and depressed," Grant wrote, "at the downfall of a foe who had fought so long and valiantly, and had suffered so much for a cause, though that cause was, I believe, one of the worst for which a people ever fought." As news of the surrender spread through Union camps, batteries began firing joyful salutes until Grant ordered them stopped. "The war is over," he said; "the rebels are our countrymen again, and the best sight of rejoicing after the victory will be to abstain from all demonstrations." To help bring those former rebels back in the Union, Grant sent three days' rations for 25,000 men across the lines. This perhaps did something to ease the psychological as well as physical pain of Lee's soldiers.
After 150 years it might seem silly to keep re-living the past, but isn't that what we keep doing-in an increasingly nonsensical manner as it becomes almost spiteful on both sides of the issue. Maybe taking the time to acknowledge the horrific nature of the Civil War and the real meaning of reunification would be beneficial.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
60 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
We should leve monuments up that were installed in the past and learn from them, yes.
NYC_SKP
Apr 2015
#47
Yes, I'm defending monuments to racists-- not to honor them but to remind ourselves.
NYC_SKP
Apr 2015
#53
The South is currently punishing us all with Republican control of the country.
onehandle
Apr 2015
#10
The lion's share of control is below the Mason-Dixon line. It is the Confederacy 2.0. nt
onehandle
Apr 2015
#23
There are two types "re-fighting" the Civil War, the bigots and the ones you mentioned.
Behind the Aegis
Apr 2015
#49
I'd be the first to fly a giant-sized white flag off the patio of my Texas apartment.
LanternWaste
Apr 2015
#5
I think the South should give all the tax $ they get from the rest of us back!
tenderfoot
Apr 2015
#57
But Appomattox Court House was not the last surrender. It wasn't even the largest.
El Supremo
Apr 2015
#54
How about we just let it go. Ignore the day and everything else about the Confeds
NightWatcher
Apr 2015
#56