General Discussion

abelenkpe

(9,933 posts)

8. ..

Fri May 4, 2012, 10:46 PM

May 2012

"And how about designing clothes that flatter such women? "

I'm not sure who clothes today are designed for. Lately I see jumpsuits are the rage. Really? Who wants to completely disrobe every time they have to visit the loo? And these one shouldered and tube top tops. I'm sure those would go over well on the average woman in the workplace. Lots of sheer tops out now too. I swear clothes today are designed for women who don't work, use the bathroom or ever even consider bending over.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Vogue magazine's new policy bans skinny models [View all] Baitball Blogger May 2012 OP

BRAVO!!! Odin2005 May 2012 #1

So they just can't seem listless? LeftyMom May 2012 #2

"Healthy" in fashion terms = size 4 instead of size 0. Myrina May 2012 #3

Better for the kids, at least. DCKit May 2012 #6

So instead of size 0 models LadyHawkAZ May 2012 #4

A little bit vague about it aren't they. How about some specifics like no one more than 5% below.... yourout May 2012 #5

How about some curvaceous, in other words, "mature-looking" middle-aged and older women, JDPriestly May 2012 #7

.. abelenkpe May 2012 #8

Absolutely. JDPriestly May 2012 #12

Now you're talkin' guitar man May 2012 #10

Agreed !!! I'm a husky guy.... rppper May 2012 #13

I'm a thin guy guitar man May 2012 #14

don't most Magazines now have Actors/Singers on their cover instead of models ? JI7 May 2012 #9

what are they gonna do about the photoshopped ads? pansypoo53219 May 2012 #11

Praise the Lord! Number23 May 2012 #15

How about some realism? JNelson6563 May 2012 #16

There are technical problems... Mopar151 May 2012 #17