Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Barney Frank drops a bombshell: How a shocking anecdote explains the financial crisis [View all]merrily
(45,251 posts)27. Also, bonuses for Executives involved in TARP, incl. AIG:
President Barack Obama said, "I)ts hard to understand how derivative traders at AIG warranted any bonuses, much less $165 million in extra pay. How do they justify this outrage to the taxpayers who are keeping the company afloat?" and "In the last six months, AIG has received substantial sums from the U.S. Treasury. Ive asked Secretary Geithner to use that leverage and pursue every legal avenue to block these bonuses and make the American taxpayers whole."[3][4]
BUT:
Initially, Senator Chris Dodd was identified by Treasury Department spokesmen as being responsible for the inclusion of the provison exempting such bonuses from the executive pay limits clause of the TARP. However, on February 14, 2009, the Wall Street Journal published an article, Bankers Face Strict New Pay Cap,[61] discussing a retroactive limit to bonus compensation inserted by Chris Dodd into the TARP bill that passed in the Senate.
The same article went on to mention that Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and Lawrence Summers "had called Sen. Dodd and asked him to reconsider". When the bill left conference, Dodd's provision had been removed and replaced with the explicit exemptions lobbied for by Geithner and Summers.
As Dodd explained in his March 18 interview on CNN,[62] at Geithner and the Obama Administration's insistence he removed the language he had himself inserted and replaced it with Geithner and Summers' loophole, which thus allowed the bonuses which formed the basis for the AIG scandal.
Dodd retreated from his original statement that he did not know how the bill was changed [63] Dodd was criticised by many in the Connecticut media for the apparent flip-flop.[64][65] In a March 20, 2009 editorial the New Haven Register called Dodd "a lying weasel" [66] The same day, Hartford Courant columnist Rick Green called on Dodd not to seek re-election in 2010.[67]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AIG_bonus_payments_controversy
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
79 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Barney Frank drops a bombshell: How a shocking anecdote explains the financial crisis [View all]
TheNutcracker
Apr 2015
OP
Thanks for kicking...this is BILLIONS of OUR DOLLARS, being kept by the banks!
TheNutcracker
Apr 2015
#2
This is the root of U.S rot. Yes, Obama has some splanin to do. But where is that money, and
TheNutcracker
Apr 2015
#6
Dodd had mortgage deals thru crook Angelo Mozilo of Countrywide. See #12. Also told CT people
appalachiablue
Apr 2015
#18
Don't forget Timothy Geithner. I remember Elizabeth Warren grilling him about the Mortgage relief
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#37
The likes of Dodd and Frank did not have to knuckle under to Obama or Geithner, either.
merrily
Apr 2015
#75
I absolutely agree with you. Right from the beginning they did not stand up when it was
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#76
Tomorrow, each of us call our one congresscritter and tell them you're waiting for the release
TheNutcracker
Apr 2015
#7
So funny, just today I was wondering why the banks were allowed to use the bailout money to invest
DesertDiamond
Apr 2015
#11
How about that, helping overseas banks but not distressed Americans. Troubling-
appalachiablue
Apr 2015
#13
This is concerning, wonder why Frank is revealing it now. Before leaving Congress
appalachiablue
Apr 2015
#12
That's in the OP & he was just on Bill Maher discussing his book. The timing of it, the year
appalachiablue
Apr 2015
#35
Arguably the corporate media would have squashed his account had he talked on it earlier...
cascadiance
Apr 2015
#47
The "Obama is a Socialist!" meme was all packaged up and ready for widespread distribution.
hunter
Apr 2015
#17
You should not have stopped reading because if you had continued to read you have
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#55
"He would only do it if the President-elect asked him to.” What kind of B.S. is this?
stevenleser
Apr 2015
#30
What are you doubting? Bush did say he would not request TARP II unless Obama asked him to
merrily
Apr 2015
#32
I followed it and that is also ridiculous. He's not the President until inauguration day.
stevenleser
Apr 2015
#34
I don't have to do anything. I'm right. Constitutionally, a President-Elect has zero power. Period.
stevenleser
Apr 2015
#46
This is what Obama FUDrs are hanging their hats on, the "percieved" power of an elect not someone
uponit7771
Apr 2015
#70
I wonder how they find enough newprint to cover up the next crash that's coming.
nolabels
Apr 2015
#42
Makes one wonder if Perhaps Wall Street going Bankrupt might have been the better choice?
One_Life_To_Give
Apr 2015
#43
Big deal Frank shocking anecdote was on Bush's watch, the Sen from Il was just a Sen.
CK_John
Apr 2015
#50
It isn't a bombshell to many of us. Many of us have known this from the start.
Enthusiast
Apr 2015
#59
During the State of the Union Address the President said there are irresponsible home borrowers too.
Enthusiast
Apr 2015
#63
Was that said at the 2009 SOTU? The blame the homeowner meme is a distortion from
appalachiablue
Apr 2015
#66
I believe it was the 2009 SOTU. Needless to say I am a huge fan of Krugman and Stiglitz.
Enthusiast
Apr 2015
#67
A neighbor of my brother got a reduction also. A woman, lawyer, with two kids, the little girl
appalachiablue
Apr 2015
#68
why do you think that your individual experience negates everything in the article?
Doctor_J
Apr 2015
#79