Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

saras

(6,670 posts)

2. So what ARE these criteria that are so flawed?

Reply to mfcorey1 (Original post)

Sat May 5, 2012, 03:59 AM

May 2012

The survey itself should most certainly should be public, even though the supervisors' ratings should not. Kind of an obvious missing item in the original article.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What is Rick Scott doing? Whatever it is, there are devious intentions. [View all] mfcorey1 May 2012 OP

pRick Scott is controlled and directed by the Koch Bros. lib2DaBone May 2012 #1

So what ARE these criteria that are so flawed? saras May 2012 #2

Did tax dollars pay for the survey? If so, by what right are we not allowed to see.. ret5hd May 2012 #3

Begs the question: Are FL elections controlled by the owners of their electronic voting machines? DCKit May 2012 #4

Alex Sink....We need you Giantsfootball10 May 2012 #5