Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So, does Rahm's victory in Chicago tell us anything? [View all]JonLP24
(29,929 posts)50. Obama clearly campaigned & advocated policy views that he did 180s on
There are very real reasons why there is the difference & this involves numerous different issues especially regarding foreign policy & 4th amendment issues.
Check out his Day 1 Memo
The Freedom of Information Act should be administered with a clear presumption: In the face of doubt, openness prevails. The Government should not keep information confidential merely because public officials might be embarrassed by disclosure, because errors and failures might be revealed, or because of speculative or abstract fears. Nondisclosure should never be based on an effort to protect the personal interests of Government officials at the expense of those they are supposed to serve. In responding to requests under the FOIA, executive branch agencies (agencies) should act promptly and in a spirit of cooperation, recognizing that such agencies are servants of the public.
All agencies should adopt a presumption in favor of disclosure, in order to renew their commitment to the principles embodied in FOIA, and to usher in a new era of open Government. The presumption of disclosure should be applied to all decisions involving FOIA.
The presumption of disclosure also means that agencies should take affirmative steps to make information public. They should not wait for specific requests from the public. All agencies should use modern technology to inform citizens about what is known and done by their Government. Disclosure should be timely.
I direct the Attorney General to issue new guidelines governing the FOIA to the heads of executive departments and agencies, reaffirming the commitment to accountability and transparency, and to publish such guidelines in the Federal Register. In doing so, the Attorney General should review FOIA reports produced by the agencies under Executive Order 13392 of December 14, 2005. I also direct the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to update guidance to the agencies to increase and improve information dissemination to the public, including through the use of new technologies, and to publish such guidance in the Federal Register.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Freedom_of_Information_Act/
A lot said I agree with. However, torture photos & other things were blocked with the Bush era argument -- because of speculative or abstract fears.
A lot of the 180s boil down to this if you support them "Bush was right". Dusting off of the Espionage Act? Ashcroft began that one. Obama quite clearly said one thing & did another. It isn't like the "not good enough" isn't unreasonable.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
150 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Why does other politicians go to the same sources and you only mentioned Hillary?
Thinkingabout
Apr 2015
#14
Start the advancement of yourself, maybe running for office in the next election, show what
Thinkingabout
Apr 2015
#46
Quite frankly, many of us do a lot for our party and country and our communities..........
leftofcool
Apr 2015
#86
With over 50% not voting, this same group who cries they do not have a candidate they are
Thinkingabout
Apr 2015
#27
Charles Pierce had an interesting piece on one particular influence on the race he
bullwinkle428
Apr 2015
#3
I sort of agree that a 12 point victory in a race with 28% turnout is less than 'handily won' at
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2015
#22
So your point is there's nothing to learn here. In other words, there is no point.
kysrsoze
Apr 2015
#55
Voters who were satisifed with Rahm didn't have to vote in order for Rahm to win.
Major Hogwash
Apr 2015
#118
Evidently not! With a poor turnout like this, nothing can be drawn from it to predict the 2016 . .
Major Hogwash
Apr 2015
#129
Absolutely! Clinton didn't win 50% of the vote in 1992, and yet he was President.
Major Hogwash
Apr 2015
#120
More importantly, he won by almost 6% and better than 2-1 in electroral votes
FBaggins
Apr 2015
#124
Why doesn't this over 50% offer another candidate? You can say people are not enthusiastic about
Thinkingabout
Apr 2015
#16
Easier voting would be very good. I have worked the past few years in a voting precinct and some
Thinkingabout
Apr 2015
#99
But why do machine attacks work? It's not like people can't take 2 minutes and Google the positions
Chathamization
Apr 2015
#67
How many machine candidates lie about progressive issues on their sites? I haven't seen any saying
Chathamization
Apr 2015
#70
When over 50% do not vote, then if this 50% got a candidate, went and voted who do you think
Thinkingabout
Apr 2015
#100
In this case there were just two candidates. And the progressive had heavy progressive support.
Chathamization
Apr 2015
#144
Yes. A few things, maybe...1) the majority of voters vote against their own interests
Zorra
Apr 2015
#11
Did electronic voting prevent over 50% of the voters from showing up and voting?
Thinkingabout
Apr 2015
#19
This is true, and those who thinks it a waste of time to vote should be happy with whatever results
Thinkingabout
Apr 2015
#127
Yes, we know who isn't for our issues, the GOP is still taking from the 90% and giving welfare to
Thinkingabout
Apr 2015
#137
Blahblahblah. Do you have any idea how simplistic and ludicrous your response is?
Zorra
Apr 2015
#105
I think the election that tells us most about 2016 was the one in Ferguson.
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2015
#28
Given the reports coming out of Chicago regarding doctored ballots it says something.
davsand
Apr 2015
#62