Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Let's tie Obama's hands behind his back, then bludgeon him on "weak" job numbers [View all]
That's the game Congress played. They didn't care about getting people back to work. Their stated goal was to make Obama a one-termer. If a proposal would help the economy or average person, it went nowhere. It's amazing the economy has recovered as well as it has considering Europe's austerity measures are leading them back into a second recession. Wonder why nobody in the media is pointing that out?
156 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Let's tie Obama's hands behind his back, then bludgeon him on "weak" job numbers [View all]
nobodyspecial
May 2012
OP
Large majorities?! Ever heard of Joe Lieberman? Ben Nelson? Filibusters? The GOP?
FarLeftFist
May 2012
#100
The problem is, that when it was the Bailouts, which btw, were voted against in the first vote by
sabrina 1
May 2012
#118
Yes, and that is why I never bought the excuses. They managed to get the HC Bill passed also.
sabrina 1
May 2012
#143
And you keep pushing the fallacy that sixty votes is needed to get anything done
MadHound
May 2012
#11
Yeah, he should have just called them dicks and rallied the people to storm the Capitol.
nobodyspecial
May 2012
#14
Wow. And he was able to do all of that without a filibuster-proof majority!
girl gone mad
May 2012
#132
Extending the tax cuts was a major capitulation, like For Profit Health Care.
bahrbearian
May 2012
#56
Actually, he did--the only problem is that the guys holding his arms behind his back were Blue Dogs.
Arkana
May 2012
#65
Well, you know, being unemployed and underemployed for two years now is pretty depressing
MadHound
May 2012
#96
congress does not matter if you have a senate that blocked a majority of good.
pansypoo53219
May 2012
#76
Yep...it is amazing. We've heard so much about the Tax cuts (for the rich) and how they will...
BlueJazz
May 2012
#2
And check out the pseudo liberals who jump right on that "Obama is bad.", bandwagon
NNN0LHI
May 2012
#10
I seriously doubt that posting on DU will have all that big an impact one way or the other.
marmar
May 2012
#35
You won't change the minds of those who have blamed Obama since day one.
great white snark
May 2012
#45
It's been the republican strategy since Obama's first day in office. Has the potential to work,
pampango
May 2012
#54
President Obama: "I've never believed that government's role is to create jobs or prosperity"
Better Believe It
May 2012
#72
"I believe it’s the...skill and dedication of our workers...that’s made us the wealthiest nation..."
ProSense
May 2012
#74
Like Obama said: "I've never believed that government's role is to create jobs or prosperity"
Better Believe It
May 2012
#112
I take it you are also against massive government public works programs to help the unemployed.
Better Believe It
May 2012
#127
Poor, poor powerless little Obama. Apparently only Republican Presidents have any power.
Edweird
May 2012
#108
There's a reason Kucinich got the 'come to Jesus' plane ride and not Lieberman.
Edweird
May 2012
#116
So we're back to poor, poor pwerless Obama against big bad Lieberman, so he has to beat up Kucinich
Edweird
May 2012
#121
The Left (an 2/3'rds of the nation) supported Single payer and accepted the public option as a
Edweird
May 2012
#131
Yep, he applied pressure to pass the RW individual mandate instead of single payer
Edweird
May 2012
#139