Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(94,233 posts)
12. here's one response
Sat May 5, 2012, 11:29 AM
May 2012

"I hardly think you’ve seen any excessive celebration taking place here," Obama said at a press conference with Japanese Prime Minister Noda.

"I think the American people remember rightly what we as a country accomplished in bringing to justice someone who killed 3,000 of our citizens."

Obama said the anniversary would mark a time for “some reflection to give thanks to those who participated,” which is said was “entirely appropriate and that’s what’s taken place."

http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/224559-obama-theres-been-no-excessive-celebration-marking-bin-laden-death


___ then, there's the entire series of statements regarding Romney's fitness for CiC, which very few miss the obvious dig at the recent critics who won't give him an inch of room to crow about the killing.

Without mentioning his opponent by name, President Obama took clear political aim at Mitt Romney on Monday, continuing a line of attack from his campaign that Romney would not have given the go-ahead to the mission that ended in the death of Osama bin Laden.

Asked about Romney’s comments from earlier this morning belittling how difficult the decision to go after bin Laden may have been, the president said “As far as my personal role and what other folks would do, I’d just recommend that everybody take a look at people’s previous statements in terms of whether they thought it was appropriate to go into Pakistan and take out bin Laden. I assume that people meant what they said when they said it. That’s been at least my practice.”

The president was alluding to Romney’s 2007 comments about bin Laden that “it’s not worth moving heaven and earth and spending billions of dollars just trying to catch one person.” The Obama campaign last Friday released a web ad suggestion that this sentence suggests he would not have been willing to take the risk and order Navy SEALs to cross into Pakistan and infiltrate bin Laden’s Abbotabad compound.

Continued the president, “I said that I’d go after bin Laden if we had a clear shot at him and I did. If there are others who have said one thing and now suggest they’d do something else, then I’d go ahead and let them explain it.”

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/04/president-obama-suggests-the-public-look-at-romneys-previous-statements-on-going-after-obl/

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Focusing on the fact that Obama killed Bin Laden will help Democrats, not hurt us. JDPriestly May 2012 #1
Whether or not Swiftboating Obama is foolhardy, should Democrats ProgressiveEconomist May 2012 #3
"Mike Huckabee is taking the lead . . ." asjr May 2012 #2
It won't work malaise May 2012 #4
Kerry responded, repeatedly; the press didn't pick it up bigtree May 2012 #5
'The President and his campaign are already responding' How? ProgressiveEconomist May 2012 #7
here's one response bigtree May 2012 #12
The whole thing could be diffused with just one ad Gman May 2012 #6
The FACT is that you are repeating a media FALLACY. Kerry responded immediately to the first attack blm May 2012 #8
"30 page response" "Faxed a letter to station managers"... ProgressiveEconomist May 2012 #11
You didn't read down, did you? Kerry hit it every time and media REFUSED to acknowledge it. blm May 2012 #17
Couldn't Kerry have bypassed the media ProgressiveEconomist May 2012 #18
You're missing the part where this IS all about lessons learned about the media and applying blm May 2012 #23
I'm not concerned about "the media climate at the time". I'm concerned about November 2012. ProgressiveEconomist May 2012 #24
Just didn't want you building on a fallacy. That FCC ruling in 2005 was CRUCIAL to media's attitude blm May 2012 #27
Wayne Fucking Dumond. That's how you crush Huckabee. msanthrope May 2012 #9
TY for reminding us about Huckabee's Willie Horton. Do you know anything about ProgressiveEconomist May 2012 #25
"Swiftboating" sendero May 2012 #10
"Please find a better way to characterize it". Any one-word ProgressiveEconomist May 2012 #13
It was not Kerry's failure to respond, it was the PUBLIC's gullibility, and failure to investigate. MH1 May 2012 #14
Like Higgins said to Condor: "What if they don't print it?" Iggo May 2012 #15
How is this 'Swiftboating'? Or is 'Swiftboating' a general all-around term now for coalition_unwilling May 2012 #16
Kerry was also attacked by other Vietnam vets. GoCubsGo May 2012 #19
Shit, I think a few 2-minute ads about Romney driving for 12 hours with his coalition_unwilling May 2012 #21
I watch fox consistantly about 20% of the time tapermaker May 2012 #20
"It's not just Huckabee" But Huckabee is hawking a panel of former Navy Seals, ProgressiveEconomist May 2012 #22
NO Navy Seals? Huckabee seems to have engaged in false advertising ProgressiveEconomist May 2012 #26
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Swiftboating Obama: How ...»Reply #12