Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Explanation for Dan Quayle, Sarah Palin and George W. Bush's opinions of themselves? Dunning-Kruger [View all]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect"The DunningKruger effect is a cognitive bias in which unskilled individuals suffer from illusory superiority, mistakenly rating their ability much higher than average. This bias is attributed to a metacognitive inability of the unskilled to recognize their mistakes."
I think Dunning-Kruger effect explains a lot of Republican politicians, like Sarah Palin, Dan Quayle, George W. Bush.
"Kruger and Dunning proposed that, for a given skill, incompetent people will:
1.tend to overestimate their own level of skill;
2.fail to recognize genuine skill in others;
3.fail to recognize the extremity of their inadequacy;
4.recognize and acknowledge their own previous lack of skill, if they can be trained to substantially improve."
--------------------------------------------
I think that if you pair Dunning-Kruger's posits with the American electorate's general bias against people who seem to be smarter than themselves and you basically get some of the more significant reason the Republican Party is successful. Incompetent people who think they are capable but whose inadequacies and lack of congnitive abilities are apparent and an electorate who likes to vote for dumb people. It's a match made in...well...it's a match anyway.
32 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Explanation for Dan Quayle, Sarah Palin and George W. Bush's opinions of themselves? Dunning-Kruger [View all]
stevenleser
May 2012
OP
I think most are willfully corrupt rather than incompetent. They choose to fuck us over. nt
valerief
May 2012
#11
i agree they are willfully corrupt as far as their positions go. but they're incompetent
unblock
May 2012
#19
And those guys are only the agents for the truly corrupt--the gazillionaires who run the planet. nt
valerief
May 2012
#24
i agree with dunning-kruger, but more important is the anti-intellectualism in politics
unblock
May 2012
#4