Why I don't think the phrase/argument white privilege is effective.

[elias7]

102. I actually see the issue as hopelessly multi dimensional

Not being literate on the subject, I am probably rehashing old covered ground, but I was merely pointing out that the privilege threads do tend to be one dimensional, ie focused on black and white.

I see a complex dynamic of class, race, gender, sexuality, religion, intellect, emotional intelligence, social intelligence, and plenty more categories that combine as uniquely as fingerprints for any and every individual, to the extent that it is difficult for me to segregate privilege merely by a simple racial formula.

I don't think anyone can honestly dispute the deeply embedded racism that dominates the cultural dynamic. At the same time, it seems like defining privilege requires a scorecard. I get 2 points for being white, 1 point for being male, but 1 point off for being Jewish, but gain a half point back because I try not to act Jewish, 1 point for moderately good intellect and literacy, but points off again for sub par emotional and social intelligence. A half point for middle class background, but a half point off for being raised in the sterility of the suburbs, but kudos for having risen to a higher tax bracket and have a job of some prestige. I have a big bald spot, but am not obese; I am middle aged, so I have learned a few things that help, but opportunities, health, and beauty are fading. I am not materialistic, and I don't like crowds, Have chosen a rural home to the city, and well, i could go on.

i see major disparity in privilege even within every single family, let alone this country. I see huge disparity in privilege when comparing anyone in this country with those in most or many parts of the world.

It is just a very muddy issue to me, so a simplified framing of our complex societal dynamic as white privilege seems shallow, but probably an effective way to reach the consciousness of those unaware of how good they have it.