Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(19,768 posts)

6. I certainly don't support that amendment, but I cringe when one group

Sat May 5, 2012, 12:15 PM

May 2012

wants to silence another.

Censorship is not an answer.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Those who promote this abomination will have to deal with this legacy Cooley Hurd May 2012 #1

some will G_j May 2012 #2

I'm assuming "amendment 1" isn't the first amendment here? Posteritatis May 2012 #3

I added further context to the OP nt G_j May 2012 #4

Ugh. (nt) Posteritatis May 2012 #5

I certainly don't support that amendment, but I cringe when one group Skip Intro May 2012 #6

I don't see ads promoting white supremecy. nt G_j May 2012 #9

Years ago.... musical_soul May 2012 #14

Really? You cringe? RetroLounge May 2012 #11

Yeah, really. Skip Intro May 2012 #12

They have a "right" to advertise on this site? RetroLounge May 2012 #15

Um, the OP isn't about ads on DU. Skip Intro May 2012 #16

You're correct, I misread and snarked when I should not have RetroLounge May 2012 #17

Identical to Florida's HockeyMom May 2012 #7

one can "wish" nt G_j May 2012 #10

First amendment problem here..... musical_soul May 2012 #13