Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: US should return stolen land to Indian tribes, says United Nations [View all]RC
(25,592 posts)19. Maybe you should read the article
Anaya said Rosebud is an example where returning land taken by the US government could improve a tribe's fortunes as well as contribute to a "process of reconciliation".
"At Rosebud, that's a situation where indigenous people have seen over time encroachment on to their land and they've lost vast territories and there have been clear instances of broken treaty promises. It's undisputed that the Black Hills was guaranteed them by treaty and that treaty was just outright violated by the United States in the 1900s. That has been recognised by the United States supreme court," he said.
>SNIP<
"These are important steps but we're talking about mismanagement by the government of assets that were left to indigenous peoples," he said. "This money for the insults on top of the injury. It's not money for the initial problem itself, which is the taking of vast territories. This is very important and I think the administration should be commended for moving forward to settle these claims but there are these deeper issues that need to be addressed."
"At Rosebud, that's a situation where indigenous people have seen over time encroachment on to their land and they've lost vast territories and there have been clear instances of broken treaty promises. It's undisputed that the Black Hills was guaranteed them by treaty and that treaty was just outright violated by the United States in the 1900s. That has been recognised by the United States supreme court," he said.
>SNIP<
"These are important steps but we're talking about mismanagement by the government of assets that were left to indigenous peoples," he said. "This money for the insults on top of the injury. It's not money for the initial problem itself, which is the taking of vast territories. This is very important and I think the administration should be commended for moving forward to settle these claims but there are these deeper issues that need to be addressed."
The problem is not just any ol' land, but land that was theirs, the aboriginals, through signed deeds with the United States Government, that were subsequently found to have oil, gas, minerals, or otherwise found to have worth for the White Man and then having the land then taken away from them. The Black Hills is only the most famous of the injustices done to the original inhabitants of this country. The United States Government has kept very few of its agreements.
Edited to add: I can't believe the callus racism of some posters here. If the Native Americans were Black or Hispanic, instead of aboriginals, this wouldn't fly very well. But never mind, they're just injians, so who give a fuck, right.
Well I do!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
US should return stolen land to Indian tribes, says United Nations [View all]
MichaelMcGuire
May 2012
OP
Land by itself doesn't do much. What determines economic gain is what you do with the land.
dkf
May 2012
#1
I've farmed and raised animals ...... it's not all that difficult, and of course Native
polly7
May 2012
#9
So their current financial difficulties aren't due to lack of knowledge or education and are
dkf
May 2012
#15
"Edited to add: I can't believe the callus racism of some posters here."
MichaelMcGuire
May 2012
#26
Yeah, especially since that poster usually gives full-throated support of private property.
Starry Messenger
May 2012
#28
Which is crazy since it was President Wilson who laid the groundwork for the UN...an American Pres!
vaberella
May 2012
#7
And what about Mexico, UN? You seriously think that Mexico would waste it's time with Texas now?
vaberella
May 2012
#5
The Cobell vs Salazar settlement ended all American Indian claims against the US Federal Government
PufPuf23
May 2012
#12
Although I think all Native tribes should have a lot better living conditions
Amonester
May 2012
#34
If the Seminoles were returned their land lost in era of the Trail of Tears ...
lpbk2713
May 2012
#37
James Anaya, UN Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples visits NCAI
MichaelMcGuire
May 2012
#44