Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

quaker bill

(8,264 posts)
23. The precise mechanism is barely relevant
Sun Apr 12, 2015, 07:16 AM
Apr 2015

An explosion of any sort in a nuclear reactor is always a bad thing. The fact that it was not a nuclear detonation very slightly improves it. Chernobyl was not a nuclear detonation per se, but it was a very bad thing.

There is a thing about radiation and in particular cesium you need to get. It has probably been explained before, but I will give it a whack.

E=MC^2. (Energy = Mass * Speed of light (squared))

What this means to a cesium atom (or any other atom, regardless of source):

Radiation is energy.

For a cesium atom to release energy (read radiation), it must lose mass. Typically in nuclear chemistry this happens when fission occurs. Typically fission breaks an atom into two pieces, sometimes one piece is smaller than an atom, but often two different atoms result. Neither of the two new atoms are cesium, and when you add all the split parts up, there is slightly less mass than there was before fission. This is where the energy in the radiation photon of say a gamma ray comes from. If you can determine the missing mass, you can then calculate the energy of the photon produced using the above formula and determine the wavelength of the radiation produced.

This is called nuclear decay. For any single atom of any species, decay happens once. An atom of a radioactive isotope does not sit there glowing and spewing radiation, it decays, once. Emitting radiation requires a loss of mass and this happens only during decay. After decay, it is no longer cesium. Where the danger of cesium 137 comes in is the short half life, the short half life means that cesium 137, in even very small quantity, say a million atoms or so, will produce a lot of individual nuclear decays in a short time.

It is important to remember how small atoms are. A million cesium 137 atoms will have a mass of 1.37 * 10^-15 grams, a tiny fraction of a picogram. (about a millionth).

Being exposed to ionizing radiation is not a good thing. It does however happen all the time and every day. Our bodies have developed repair mechanisms to deal with it. If they hadn't our lifespans would be far shorter.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Finally RobertEarl Apr 2015 #1
I had to clean some of it off the windows and cars over past couple days- snooper2 Apr 2015 #2
You too? zappaman Apr 2015 #3
Don't eat the yellow snow RobertEarl Apr 2015 #4
If the snow is yellow, it aint from radiation NickB79 Apr 2015 #7
Glad you brought that up RobertEarl Apr 2015 #10
Really? FBaggins Apr 2015 #5
My estimate? RobertEarl Apr 2015 #6
That's not an answer FBaggins Apr 2015 #8
You think corium came out in that hydrogen explosion? nt Bonobo Apr 2015 #9
What I think RobertEarl Apr 2015 #11
Care to try again? FBaggins Apr 2015 #13
No, you didn't. Yes, you did. FBaggins! RobertEarl Apr 2015 #15
You actually think electrolysis = "water splits into hydrogen and oxygen when it gets hot"? FBaggins Apr 2015 #16
Why yes water does split into hydrogen and oxygen RobertEarl Apr 2015 #18
Most likely a zirconium fire quaker bill Apr 2015 #19
Yes, thanks RobertEarl Apr 2015 #20
Nope. Not from heat it doesn't. FBaggins Apr 2015 #21
That sure is ugly RobertEarl Apr 2015 #22
The precise mechanism is barely relevant quaker bill Apr 2015 #23
Thanks for that info, QB RobertEarl Apr 2015 #25
The energy (radiation) moves at the speed of light quaker bill Apr 2015 #29
Actually... it's entirely relevant. FBaggins Apr 2015 #31
More so than you realize. But it's also hilarious. FBaggins Apr 2015 #30
The technology that will be developed to deal with this obxhead Apr 2015 #12
I have a feeling.. RobertEarl Apr 2015 #28
''However, the robot stopped functioning before completing the day's planned inspection.'' Octafish Apr 2015 #14
Tepco doesn't know why... so what's your theory? FBaggins Apr 2015 #17
Poor Design? Ask TEPCO. Octafish Apr 2015 #24
You've obviously been reading too many of RobertEarl's imaginings FBaggins Apr 2015 #33
Also worth noting that "choked" is a stretch. FBaggins Apr 2015 #34
They tried Omaha Steve Apr 2015 #26
The electronics are workin fine FBaggins Apr 2015 #32
I wish my grandfather were still alive davidpdx Apr 2015 #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Robot enters Fukushima Da...»Reply #23