Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)An Unabashedly Liberal Hillary Clinton [View all]

An Unabashedly Liberal Hillary Clinton
THE ATLANTIC, APR 13 2015, 7:02 AM ET
By PETER BEINART
Every presidential campaign is a bet on the American mood at a given moment in time. I watched Hillary Clintons presidential announcement video alongside the one she issued in 2007, and the speech she gave declaring her senate candidacy in New York in 2000. The upshot: America, as seen by Hillary and the people advising her, is a lot further left than it was a decade or two ago.
Here are some of the phrases that appeared in Hillarys 2000 senate announcement: voluntary uniform rating system for movies and films, welfare, more police on the streets, teacher testing in the face of boycotts, I dont believe government is the solution to all our problems and parents, all parents, must be responsible. The message was pure Clintonism, as developed when Bill ran the Democratic Leadership Council in the early 1990s: To deserve government help, people must be morally responsible. And it came naturally to a senate candidate who, although caricatured as a sixties radical, was better described, by a former White House aide, as a very judgmental Methodist from the Midwest.
(snip)
All that cultural conservatism is gone in the video she issued last night. Its not just the image of a gay male couple holding hands while announcing their impending wedding, followed later by what appears to be a lesbian couple. Its not just the biracial couple. Or the brothers speaking Spanish. Its also the absence of culturally conservative imagery: no clergymen, no police, one barely noticeable church. Instead, the video starts with a woman who is moving so her daughter can attend a better school. A bit later it features a woman who after staying home with her kids is going back to work. In both cases, theres no father in sight. Whether or not Clinton and her advisors were trying to showcase single mothers, they certainly werent afraid of being accused of showcasing them. In 2000, in the wake of a welfare reform debate in which single mothers were made symbols of the moral irresponsibility the Clintons campaigned against, these positive depictions would have been unimaginable.
The video Hillary released yesterday was also devoid of soldiers. And it contained no discussion of foreign policy. Compare that to Hillarys 2007 video, the first substantive words of which were: lets talk about how to bring the right end to the war in Iraq and to restore respect for America around the world. Later in that video, she championed her work protecting our soldiers.
More: http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/04/an-unabashedly-liberal-hillary-clinton/390339/
THE ATLANTIC, APR 13 2015, 7:02 AM ET
By PETER BEINART
Every presidential campaign is a bet on the American mood at a given moment in time. I watched Hillary Clintons presidential announcement video alongside the one she issued in 2007, and the speech she gave declaring her senate candidacy in New York in 2000. The upshot: America, as seen by Hillary and the people advising her, is a lot further left than it was a decade or two ago.
Here are some of the phrases that appeared in Hillarys 2000 senate announcement: voluntary uniform rating system for movies and films, welfare, more police on the streets, teacher testing in the face of boycotts, I dont believe government is the solution to all our problems and parents, all parents, must be responsible. The message was pure Clintonism, as developed when Bill ran the Democratic Leadership Council in the early 1990s: To deserve government help, people must be morally responsible. And it came naturally to a senate candidate who, although caricatured as a sixties radical, was better described, by a former White House aide, as a very judgmental Methodist from the Midwest.
(snip)
All that cultural conservatism is gone in the video she issued last night. Its not just the image of a gay male couple holding hands while announcing their impending wedding, followed later by what appears to be a lesbian couple. Its not just the biracial couple. Or the brothers speaking Spanish. Its also the absence of culturally conservative imagery: no clergymen, no police, one barely noticeable church. Instead, the video starts with a woman who is moving so her daughter can attend a better school. A bit later it features a woman who after staying home with her kids is going back to work. In both cases, theres no father in sight. Whether or not Clinton and her advisors were trying to showcase single mothers, they certainly werent afraid of being accused of showcasing them. In 2000, in the wake of a welfare reform debate in which single mothers were made symbols of the moral irresponsibility the Clintons campaigned against, these positive depictions would have been unimaginable.
The video Hillary released yesterday was also devoid of soldiers. And it contained no discussion of foreign policy. Compare that to Hillarys 2007 video, the first substantive words of which were: lets talk about how to bring the right end to the war in Iraq and to restore respect for America around the world. Later in that video, she championed her work protecting our soldiers.
More: http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/04/an-unabashedly-liberal-hillary-clinton/390339/
243 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
No one I know believed that WMD bs, yet she advocated for that war, not just voted it.
merrily
Apr 2015
#42
Somewhere out there, there is a video of a Code Pink encounter about our invading Iraq.
JDPriestly
Apr 2015
#66
Is this it? I don't have sound on this computer so I don't know what they're saying
arcane1
Apr 2015
#82
I'll have to check it out later. Last week I rewatched her speech announcing her vote
arcane1
Apr 2015
#111
Yes. But that's like a politician who dismisses something she did last year...
RufusTFirefly
Apr 2015
#172
Huge mistake, but, do you know a republican who is running who would have voted NO and
NoJusticeNoPeace
Apr 2015
#52
I just heard a story about Hillary making me an even bigger supporter now
NoJusticeNoPeace
Apr 2015
#138
That one "mistake" cost our nation untold billions of dollars and thousands of lives
derby378
Apr 2015
#168
I understand the sentiment, but the question becomes, how do you know that a new candidate
okaawhatever
Apr 2015
#139
Next year's election campaign will be about more than a single issue (14 years ago) or...
George II
Apr 2015
#64
Ask all the dead and wounded if that "one vote" 14 years ago should be forgotten.
Dawgs
Apr 2015
#67
NOBODY said it should be forgotten! But to base an opinion of a candidate on one single...
George II
Apr 2015
#75
OK. I also blame her for her support of TPP, silence on Keystone, and friendliness with Wall Street.
Dawgs
Apr 2015
#89
And unless she apologies for and says she's changed her stance on this issue...
cascadiance
Apr 2015
#126
Yeah, we really should have overlooked that little thing like the attack on Pearl Harbor.
George II
Apr 2015
#175
Actually, I think economic issues have been getting too little attention by dems
whathehell
Apr 2015
#78
I believe Clinton will position herself as continuing on and building upon the legacy of the Peace President.
Fred Sanders
Apr 2015
#6
We're winning the cultural war on some fronts (gay rights) but losing on others (women's rights)
Arugula Latte
Apr 2015
#30
Watch it without audio and look only at the images. This is a video of the Democratic Party.
Agnosticsherbet
Apr 2015
#11
As she begins her campaign trail more and more of the issues she is an advocate will
Thinkingabout
Apr 2015
#12
I lived in Hollywood (De longpre and Highland) and thought the video rocks...
DemocratSinceBirth
Apr 2015
#194
If one calls Los Angeles their home, they are not impressed with "I lived in Hollywood"
U4ikLefty
Apr 2015
#229
I was rebutting the proposition that living in L A makes one a video critic
DemocratSinceBirth
Apr 2015
#231
So you disrespect strangers, make false allegations and hide behind a peace sign.
DemocratSinceBirth
Apr 2015
#237
You started our discussion by calling me a liar... It's all here for anybody to see...
DemocratSinceBirth
Apr 2015
#241
I've heard that one before. I didn't like the punchline very much. n/t
lumberjack_jeff
Apr 2015
#106
Hillary needs to preemptively take on the RW smearing of the President. He's not running and
kelliekat44
Apr 2015
#16
These are my concerns, as well. A strong Democratic turnout will turn the Senate back to
BlueCaliDem
Apr 2015
#35
Does "unabashedly liberal" refer to a philosophical position or is it merely image?
guillaumeb
Apr 2015
#40
It's striking that the article treats her as a complete political weather vane.
Jim Lane
Apr 2015
#48
Her advisers may be thinking that she needs to run to the left in order to try to
totodeinhere
Apr 2015
#70
Also, she co-sponsored (twice!) legislation that would've criminalized flag-burning.
RufusTFirefly
Apr 2015
#81
FWIW, the story was that she was blocking a Constitutional amendment doing the same thing.
merrily
Apr 2015
#107
Honestly, I did not know what anyone said about it. It just made no sense to me.
merrily
Apr 2015
#115
I'm afraid so. Some have explained it away as three-dimensional chess...
RufusTFirefly
Apr 2015
#170
I don't think the country's all that more liberal. I just think the Democrats are
Bucky
Apr 2015
#93
THIS: "America, as seen by Hillary and the people advising her, is a lot further left than it was
calimary
Apr 2015
#99
I just find it interesting after 23 years they're still having to define who she is.
BKH70041
Apr 2015
#119
Maybe the public is responding based mainly on recognition and doesn't really give a damn yet
RufusTFirefly
Apr 2015
#128
For all his many flaws, her husband seemed to have a genuine ability to connect with people
RufusTFirefly
Apr 2015
#125
so...she's going to stop trying to privatize public education, stop Wall St. bailouts and slaps on
yurbud
Apr 2015
#122
Quit pestering her with minutiae, yurbud. The talking point is that she's a liberal.
RufusTFirefly
Apr 2015
#127
With some of the responses here, before long someone will come out against her because....
George II
Apr 2015
#130
What was the text of that amendment and the context in which the vote was taken?
George II
Apr 2015
#141
No, but if one doesn't know the background behind a Senator's vote, how can one....
George II
Apr 2015
#147
I just did a little research. As I surmised, it turned out to be a relatively benign vote.
George II
Apr 2015
#144
Was a ban on financing cluster bombs in the amendment? Again, the text and context would be useful.
George II
Apr 2015
#150
One last time, without knowing what was in that amendment (was anything else attached to it?)....
George II
Apr 2015
#162
I will need more than one video. She said all of the good things but I would rather
totodeinhere
Apr 2015
#134
and that seems to suggest Hillary is supportive of the policies the Obama administration started
still_one
Apr 2015
#153
I'm not sure if putting a some gay couples in her video indicates a sea change on the issues.
Warren DeMontague
Apr 2015
#159
You porpoisely made her leaning to the left in that pic...which from her POV means
Rex
Apr 2015
#161
HRC - The Manchurian Wall Street Candidate - The 99% Money Will Never Be Safe Again
cantbeserious
Apr 2015
#201
some of the mainstream rags are giving the onion a run for its money these days
Doctor_J
Apr 2015
#206
The 1% doesn't care about gay marriage, women's right to choose ,ect, ect, ect
raindaddy
Apr 2015
#223