Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The First Democratc Candidate has entered the Race. Who will be the next & who should s/he/they be? [View all]DefenseLawyer
(11,101 posts)30. I didn't mean to imply that it was what she wanted.
It's what I want.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
145 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The First Democratc Candidate has entered the Race. Who will be the next & who should s/he/they be? [View all]
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
OP
I wonder what would happen if every Democrat refused to take Wall St/Koch money? What if they
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#54
I don't know, haven't heard anything about him announcing he is running. If he is, that would be a
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#55
Okay, I found that he was the first to launch an exploratory committee in November last year.
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#59
He's going on listening sessions throughout WI, I think he's considering getting his seat back.
PeaceNikki
Apr 2015
#39
He is going to run for the Senate, which is great news, imo. I would like him as president, however
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#61
That's not a definite yet. I sure hope he does. We done fucked up when we lost him.
PeaceNikki
Apr 2015
#62
She's tough and fearless, AND honest, trusthworthy and when she says something, I
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#5
The concentration of money and what it buys makes democracy a game for the rich.
Octafish
Apr 2015
#29
That is a great cartoon! It is a monstrous game. We have so many good Democrats who would make
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#58
As a form of government, democracy means every citizen voting on everything. Our ills come from
merrily
Apr 2015
#115
I remember that race very well. That was when I became disgusted with the Party leadership for
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#75
I've always respected Feingold. The good news is, he IS running for the Senate. Definitely planning
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#16
That's good to know. Now we need to add more Progressive Dems to the Senate and Congress.
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#85
the party's designed to 1. take money and 2. keep taking money: allowing in candidates who
MisterP
Apr 2015
#32
Sanders could run as an Independent. That is now the largest voting bloc. Over 40% of registered
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#67
Then the Dem Party should enlist him. He is a great Democrat even if he isn't
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#82
Excellent post. And Primaries are good for Democracy. We certainly don't want to turn into one of
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#84
Sherrod brown would make a great candidate. I have been reading and listening to him
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#92
"No one seems to want to run." The Party seems to have decided that primaries are
merrily
Apr 2015
#25
Maybe because no one has stepped up who's as big of a power player as Hillary?
Drunken Irishman
Apr 2015
#106
Anyone can win an election IF their party gets behind them. Losing one race has not been a deterrent
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#110
Ted Kennedy ran against an incumbent. Hillary is not an incumbent. Besides attributing Carter's
merrily
Apr 2015
#113
Yet Hillary continuing to run in 2008 with no chance of winning supposedly helped Obama.
merrily
Apr 2015
#119
Well I disagreed with that and it's big reason I am not a fan of Hillary.
Drunken Irishman
Apr 2015
#120
The process of discouraging primaries did not come about in five minutes. It's been in the works
merrily
Apr 2015
#125
Before McGovern, there were not traditional primaries like we have today.
Drunken Irishman
Apr 2015
#131
Per the last two lines of my Reply 22, I am not going to read your post at this point.
merrily
Apr 2015
#144
P.S. I don't see the 1992 field at all the way I see the 2016 field (as we know it so far, anyway).
merrily
Apr 2015
#126
I suppose a half-dozen editorials do indeed, speak for the entire Democratic party.
LanternWaste
Apr 2015
#121
I think we have reached a point where they, those in power, have achieved their goal. Only Wall St
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#34
Don't remember any of them telling us our ideas are 'retarded' either. They seem to agree with us
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#80
We'd need to raise much $$$$, unite and organize. Raising first dollars, without seed money or
merrily
Apr 2015
#107
Thank you and I would like anyone to tell me why any one of them could not run and win if the
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#86
I find it strange that the Dem Party would NOT want Barbara Lee to run. Maybe SHE doesn't want to
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#70
Lol, but there are more of us than there are of them! It's still a Democracy no?
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#68
Lol, true, but logos don't make people's lives better. Good policies, strong leadership, less
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#77
It problably doesn't mean anything, just subliminal! Lol, like those ads that are sending
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#79
Thank you. I feel unwelcome in the Dem Party over the past few years. There was a lot of talk
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#95
That's a perfect way of putting it. 'Do as I say, don't do as I do'. Reminds me of the NJ
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#99
She has a perfect record on the issues, especially on being smart enough and courageous enough to
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#91
I didn't know Reich had talked about running. I like him, he is very good on economic issues, the
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#102
Interesting. Reich running would be great. But it's interesting to read this because recently he
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#134
You may be right. I knew he was critical of the Clintons on policies, so when I read that article
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#140
The way I see it, nothing is ever a done deal. Especially in politics. What I am afraid of is that
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#109
Someone in the thread suggested Bernie and Barbara Lee, either way. I liked that a lot.
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#128
Al Franken, that is another great choice. I only put up a few I thought of right off the bat because
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#129
Gavin Newsom, that is another good pick. Someone else mentioned Al Gore also.
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#133
Sorry about that. Thanks for the information about him. I had a positive image of him, probably
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#141
'I want as many good nominees as possible, offering as many voices as we can get'. Yes,
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#142